Debian Bug report logs - #558058
sugarplum: [INTL:ja] please add Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po)

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Hideki Yamane \(Debian-JP\)" <henrich@debian.or.jp>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: sugarplum: [INTL:ja] please add Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po)

Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:34:34 +0900

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: sugarplum
Version: 0.9.10-17.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear sugarplum package maintainer,

 Here's Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) file that 
 reviewed by several Japanese Debian developers and users.

 Could you apply it, please?

- --
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAksOPZoACgkQIu0hy8THJkvZBwCgoSb/bpHkqGLR1vKcRwtFdiYJ
3YoAoJt+Kwmfc2Oaxq0reXsZQ3EdMvIo
=46CB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ja.po (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 558058-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: sugarplum@packages.debian.org, debian-i18n@lists.debian.org

Cc: 558058-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Intent to NMU sugarplum to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 19:28:56 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear Debian maintainer,

The sugarplum Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 558058 (and maybe other similar bugs).

The i18n team is now hunting the very last bits of missing localization
and your package went on our radar. You may have uploaded recently but,
unfortunately for you, you then got *another* l10n bug report.

So, sorry for this, but the radar beeped at your package and here am I
with an NMU intent...:-)

I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian
i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
for sugarplum in order to fix this as well as all pending translations
for the debconf templates.

Of course, an upload made by you would even be better...:-)

Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider
building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical.

The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it
or if I don't receive any answer in 11 days) is roughly the following:

 Monday, May 31, 2010   : send this notice
 Friday, June 04, 2010       : post a NMU announcement to debian-i18n with you
                 (maintainer) CC'ed
                 this can happen earlier if the maintainer agrees
                 In such case, the deadlines below will also
                 happen earlier
 Thursday, June 10, 2010       : (midnight) deadline for receiving translation updates
 Friday, June 11, 2010       : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/7-day
                 send the NMU patch to the BTS
 Friday, June 18, 2010       : NMU reaches incoming

If you intent to upload yourself, please notify me so that I interrupt
the process on my side. Please also don't upload without a discussion
with me. Some translators might send a few new translations and I can handle
a round of translation updates for you. Really, don't upload silently...:-)

In case I upload an NMU, I will subscribe to the Package Tracking System for
sugarplum and follow its life for 60 days after my NMU in order to fix
any issue potentially introduced by my upload.

Let me know, as soon as possible, if you have any kind of objection to this
process.

If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package
alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now.

-- 

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 558058-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: sean finney <seanius@debian.org>

To: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

Cc: sugarplum@packages.debian.org, debian-i18n@lists.debian.org, 558058-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Intent to NMU sugarplum to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 20:04:54 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

hi christian,

i have no pending changes for sugarplum, so feel free to NMU with
no delay for this package.


	sean

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 07:28:56PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Dear Debian maintainer,
> 
> The sugarplum Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
> pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
> for po-debconf, namely bug number 558058 (and maybe other similar bugs).
> 
> The i18n team is now hunting the very last bits of missing localization
> and your package went on our radar. You may have uploaded recently but,
> unfortunately for you, you then got *another* l10n bug report.
> 
> So, sorry for this, but the radar beeped at your package and here am I
> with an NMU intent...:-)
> 
> I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian
> i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
> for sugarplum in order to fix this as well as all pending translations
> for the debconf templates.
> 
> Of course, an upload made by you would even be better...:-)
> 
> Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider
> building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical.
> 
> The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it
> or if I don't receive any answer in 11 days) is roughly the following:
> 
>  Monday, May 31, 2010   : send this notice
>  Friday, June 04, 2010       : post a NMU announcement to debian-i18n with you
>                  (maintainer) CC'ed
>                  this can happen earlier if the maintainer agrees
>                  In such case, the deadlines below will also
>                  happen earlier
>  Thursday, June 10, 2010       : (midnight) deadline for receiving translation updates
>  Friday, June 11, 2010       : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/7-day
>                  send the NMU patch to the BTS
>  Friday, June 18, 2010       : NMU reaches incoming
> 
> If you intent to upload yourself, please notify me so that I interrupt
> the process on my side. Please also don't upload without a discussion
> with me. Some translators might send a few new translations and I can handle
> a round of translation updates for you. Really, don't upload silently...:-)
> 
> In case I upload an NMU, I will subscribe to the Package Tracking System for
> sugarplum and follow its life for 60 days after my NMU in order to fix
> any issue potentially introduced by my upload.
> 
> Let me know, as soon as possible, if you have any kind of objection to this
> process.
> 
> If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package
> alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now.
> 
> -- 
> 
> 



-- 

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 558058@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: debian-i18n@lists.debian.org

Cc: 558058@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the sugarplum package

Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 22:11:01 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear maintainer of sugarplum and Debian translators,

Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the sugarplum Debian
package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation update in the BTS.

I announced the intent to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
for this package in order to fix this long-time pending localization
bug as well as all other pending translations.

The package maintainer agreed for the NMU or did not respond in four
days, so I will proceed with the NMU.

The full planned schedule is available at the end of this mail.

The package is currently translated to: 
cs de es eu fi fr gl ja nl pt ru sv tr vi

Among these, the following translations are incomplete: <none>

If you did any of the, currently incomplete, translations you will get
ANOTHER mail with the translation to update.

Other translators also have the opportunity to create new translations
for this package. Once completed, please send them as a bug report
against the sugarplum package so I can incorporate them in the build.

The deadline for receiving updates and new translations is Sunday, June 06, 2010. If you
are not in time you can always send your translation to the BTS.

The POT file is attached to this mail.

If the maintainer objects to this process I will immediately abort my NMU
and send him/her all updates I receive.

Otherwise the following will happen (or already has):

 Monday, May 31, 2010   : send the first intent to NMU notice to
                 the package maintainer.
 Monday, May 31, 2010       : send this notice
 Sunday, June 06, 2010       : (midnight) deadline for receiving translation updates
 Monday, June 07, 2010       : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/7-day
                 send the NMU patch to the BTS
 Monday, June 14, 2010       : NMU uploaded to incoming

Thanks for your efforts and time.

-- 


-- 

[templates.pot (text/plain, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #25 received at 558058@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: 558058@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Patch for the 0.9.10-17.2 NMU of sugarplum

Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 06:40:27 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear maintainer of sugarplum,

On Monday, May 31, 2010 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload a
NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial
notice sent on Monday, May 31, 2010.

You either agreed for this NMU or did not respond to my notices.

I will now upload this NMU to DELAYED/7-DAY.

The NMU patch is attached to this mail.

The NMU changelog is:


Source: sugarplum
Version: 0.9.10-17.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:42:57 +0200
Closes: 558058 584291
Changes: 
 sugarplum (0.9.10-17.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Bump debhelper compatibility level to 7.
   * As a consequence, replace "dh_clean -k" by "dh_prep".
   * Use explicit reference to GPL-2 document in debian/copyright.
   * Fix pending l10n issues. Debconf translations:
     - Japanese (Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP)).  Closes: #558058
     - Danish (Joe Hansen).  Closes: #584291

-- 

[sugarplum.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #30 received at 558058-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>

To: 558058-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#558058: fixed in sugarplum 0.9.10-17.2

Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:32:11 +0000

Source: sugarplum
Source-Version: 0.9.10-17.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sugarplum, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2.diff.gz
  to main/s/sugarplum/sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2.diff.gz
sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2.dsc
  to main/s/sugarplum/sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2.dsc
sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2_all.deb
  to main/s/sugarplum/sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 558058@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> (supplier of updated sugarplum package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:42:57 +0200
Source: sugarplum
Binary: sugarplum
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.10-17.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sean Finney <seanius@debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Description: 
 sugarplum  - an automated and intelligent spam trap/cache-poisoner
Closes: 558058 584291
Changes: 
 sugarplum (0.9.10-17.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Bump debhelper compatibility level to 7.
   * As a consequence, replace "dh_clean -k" by "dh_prep".
   * Use explicit reference to GPL-2 document in debian/copyright.
   * Fix pending l10n issues. Debconf translations:
     - Japanese (Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP)).  Closes: #558058
     - Danish (Joe Hansen).  Closes: #584291
Checksums-Sha1: 
 d48873c77d27c0a9c43e61af681ecd4f038dbf79 987 sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2.dsc
 dae31fd023ac6beecf0d3b07cdb2c3929944e752 25962 sugarplum_0.9.10.orig.tar.gz
 64b910e1d092465bd068de490063b8f4e759c976 16703 sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2.diff.gz
 a66b2b35bc43c5f74411656590b3643cd48560c2 35580 sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 ca6866cd420cd994b1c9527f92295e2455ce7c233d5d59a3b07366bbc237ccb6 987 sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2.dsc
 c2852e4e2fcfc320592594fc77deb9855ca184c3fa613469f4f0f54ce63de1ef 25962 sugarplum_0.9.10.orig.tar.gz
 1f312d2c456039bca1dd318e355509e4f1df7935efc4ab37af8168582b06b9a6 16703 sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2.diff.gz
 e973d99d260154659dbd63c155439f709dfbaab3e873a0631097e4403d30f192 35580 sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2_all.deb
Files: 
 08f2496c45793734cbcdad5ab947ab95 987 misc optional sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2.dsc
 d5c71f0fae2a10132ed3351c21bafd24 25962 misc optional sugarplum_0.9.10.orig.tar.gz
 35fdcb241200d06c915238acb4f7a624 16703 misc optional sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2.diff.gz
 0e31658ee693ef995b2f653c9b2ac833 35580 misc optional sugarplum_0.9.10-17.2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFMDcFL1OXtrMAUPS0RAlV8AJ9OSbnCqVZE5IWjT9t3Z9kokTU6rQCfZHYN
Wr295LagcoNhrCKsKZC2OQs=
=Yxar
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.