Debian Bug report logs - #558055
jwchat: [INTL:ja] please add Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po)

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Hideki Yamane \(Debian-JP\)" <henrich@debian.or.jp>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: jwchat: [INTL:ja] please add Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po)

Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:33:46 +0900

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: jwchat
Version: 1.0final-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear jwchat package maintainer,

 Here's Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) file that 
 reviewed by several Japanese Debian developers and users.

 Could you apply it, please?

- --
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAksOPWoACgkQIu0hy8THJkuSXgCfQ24S8zbxa/MSWSMGfjU6/8gI
owsAn06lggysFTRaq0XAI1nx5w8i547p
=68PO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ja.po (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 558055-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: jwchat@packages.debian.org, debian-i18n@lists.debian.org

Cc: 558055-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Intent to NMU jwchat to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 19:03:50 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear Debian maintainer,

The jwchat Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 558055 (and maybe other similar bugs).

The i18n team is now hunting the very last bits of missing localization
and your package went on our radar. You may have uploaded recently but,
unfortunately for you, you then got *another* l10n bug report.

So, sorry for this, but the radar beeped at your package and here am I
with an NMU intent...:-)

I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian
i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
for jwchat in order to fix this as well as all pending translations
for the debconf templates.

Of course, an upload made by you would even be better...:-)

Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider
building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical.

The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it
or if I don't receive any answer in 11 days) is roughly the following:

 Tuesday, May 18, 2010   : send this notice
 Saturday, May 22, 2010       : post a NMU announcement to debian-i18n with you
                 (maintainer) CC'ed
                 this can happen earlier if the maintainer agrees
                 In such case, the deadlines below will also
                 happen earlier
 Friday, May 28, 2010       : (midnight) deadline for receiving translation updates
 Saturday, May 29, 2010       : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/7-day
                 send the NMU patch to the BTS
 Saturday, June 05, 2010       : NMU reaches incoming

If you intent to upload yourself, please notify me so that I interrupt
the process on my side. Please also don't upload without a discussion
with me. Some translators might send a few new translations and I can handle
a round of translation updates for you. Really, don't upload silently...:-)

In case I upload an NMU, I will subscribe to the Package Tracking System for
jwchat and follow its life for 60 days after my NMU in order to fix
any issue potentially introduced by my upload.

Let me know, as soon as possible, if you have any kind of objection to this
process.

If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package
alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now.

-- 

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 558055@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: debian-i18n@lists.debian.org

Cc: 558055@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the jwchat package

Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 16:10:02 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear maintainer of jwchat and Debian translators,

Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the jwchat Debian
package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation update in the BTS.

I announced the intent to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
for this package in order to fix this long-time pending localization
bug as well as all other pending translations.

The package maintainer agreed for the NMU or did not respond in four
days, so I will proceed with the NMU.

The full planned schedule is available at the end of this mail.

The package is currently translated to: 
cs de es fi fr it ja nl pt pt_BR ru sv

Among these, the following translations are incomplete: fi nl pt_BR

If you did any of the, currently incomplete, translations you will get
ANOTHER mail with the translation to update.

Other translators also have the opportunity to create new translations
for this package. Once completed, please send them as a bug report
against the jwchat package so I can incorporate them in the build.

The deadline for receiving updates and new translations is Saturday, May 29, 2010. If you
are not in time you can always send your translation to the BTS.

The POT file is attached to this mail.

If the maintainer objects to this process I will immediately abort my NMU
and send him/her all updates I receive.

Otherwise the following will happen (or already has):

 Tuesday, May 18, 2010   : send the first intent to NMU notice to
                 the package maintainer.
 Sunday, May 23, 2010       : send this notice
 Saturday, May 29, 2010       : (midnight) deadline for receiving translation updates
 Sunday, May 30, 2010       : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/7-day
                 send the NMU patch to the BTS
 Sunday, June 06, 2010       : NMU uploaded to incoming

Thanks for your efforts and time.

-- 


-- 

[templates.pot (text/plain, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 558055@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marcelo Jorge Vieira <metal@debian.org>

To: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>

Cc: 558055@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: jwchat 1.0final-5.1: Please update debconf PO translation for the package jwchat

Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 15:10:59 -0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Christian,

I have intention to adopt jwchat package, and maintain it with
XMPP team. So, if it is not inconvenient, I can upload the package
and apply the patches... What do you think about it?

Cheers,

-- 
Marcelo Jorge Vieira
xmpp://metal@jabber-br.org
http://metaldot.alucinados.com

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #25 received at 558055@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: Marcelo Jorge Vieira <metal@debian.org>

Cc: 558055@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: jwchat 1.0final-5.1: Please update debconf PO translation for the package jwchat

Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:02:05 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Quoting Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal@debian.org):
> Hi Christian,
> 
> I have intention to adopt jwchat package, and maintain it with
> XMPP team. So, if it is not inconvenient, I can upload the package
> and apply the patches... What do you think about it?

No problem for me.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #30 received at 558055@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: 558055@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Patch for the l10n upload of jwchat

Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 09:09:20 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear maintainer of jwchat,

On Sunday, May 23, 2010 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload a
NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial
notice sent on Tuesday, May 18, 2010.

We finally agreed that you would do the update yourself at the end of
the l10n update round.

That time has come.

To help you out, here's the patch which I would have used for an NMU.
Please feel free to use all of it...or only the l10n part of it.

The corresponding changelog is:


Source: jwchat
Version: 1.0final-5.1
Distribution: UNRELEASED
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 19:02:11 +0200
Closes: 558055
Changes: 
 jwchat (1.0final-5.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix pending l10n issues. Debconf translations:
     - Japanese (Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP)).  Closes: #558055
     - Brazilian Portuguese (Marcelo Jorge Vieira).  Closes: #558055

-- 

[jwchat.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #35 received at 558055-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal) <metal@debian.org>

To: 558055-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#558055: fixed in jwchat 1.0final-6

Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:02:25 +0000

Source: jwchat
Source-Version: 1.0final-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jwchat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

jwchat_1.0final-6.diff.gz
  to main/j/jwchat/jwchat_1.0final-6.diff.gz
jwchat_1.0final-6.dsc
  to main/j/jwchat/jwchat_1.0final-6.dsc
jwchat_1.0final-6_all.deb
  to main/j/jwchat/jwchat_1.0final-6_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 558055@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal) <metal@debian.org> (supplier of updated jwchat package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:13:27 -0300
Source: jwchat
Binary: jwchat
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0final-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian XMPP Maintainers <pkg-xmpp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal) <metal@debian.org>
Description: 
 jwchat     - a full featured, web-based Jabber chat client
Closes: 467568 534913 558055 583616
Changes: 
 jwchat (1.0final-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Adopting jwchat package (Closes: #534913)
   * Updated Standards-Version to 3.8.4 (no changes)
   * Changed VCS fields to XMPP Team
   * Added Japanese debconf template (Closes: #558055);
     Thanks Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) <henrich@debian.or.jp>
   * Updating Brazilian Portuguese debconf template (Closes: #583616)
   * Added dependency to xmlextras (Closes: #467568)
   * Added README.Source
Checksums-Sha1: 
 961f0d1b77543401338541121bc48f3b44ee01b0 1932 jwchat_1.0final-6.dsc
 dc917b1e684bd39d92451541002d359a0704b6c9 12479 jwchat_1.0final-6.diff.gz
 2b00d1d52c6195acd9af7edfc3e82c113dd8e86d 1068902 jwchat_1.0final-6_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 70aca5319f7a8dcdcaddf9016b5d0d5d7b7d1f22fd3d2c26d99bbbfbbc632223 1932 jwchat_1.0final-6.dsc
 0c9d4e9fb6e2b5d548ca36b757fb33b8d7344d6c138f34203913b9cf403db98e 12479 jwchat_1.0final-6.diff.gz
 cd57da7e7452447472d6a8c2838a3f1bea4c3521a2d394ff4b206023e6ee0c9a 1068902 jwchat_1.0final-6_all.deb
Files: 
 4f79dd18a2cbe3e2c8430f61b5675351 1932 web optional jwchat_1.0final-6.dsc
 eee1c31cd4018041eceb495eca18909e 12479 web optional jwchat_1.0final-6.diff.gz
 b91453616620a0fe853a04fe5d8f75e8 1068902 web optional jwchat_1.0final-6_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=ChYh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.