Debian Bug report logs - #554111
[INTL:ja] please add Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po)

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Hideki Yamane \(Debian-JP\)" <henrich@debian.or.jp>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: [INTL:ja] please add Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po)

Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:07:57 +0900

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: radioclk
Version: 1.0.ds1-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear radioclk maintainer,

 Here's Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) file that 
 reviewed by several Japanese Debian developers and users.

 Could you apply it, please?

- --
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrvZk0ACgkQIu0hy8THJkv+5QCfZJKajTOgl5TpeA+oaXru6nt9
1VUAnisj12NQTrDh9iRfdsbTSS7FPKBA
=PQuf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ja.po (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 554111-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: radioclk@packages.debian.org, debian-i18n@lists.debian.org

Cc: 554111-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Intent to NMU radioclk to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:35:01 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear Debian maintainer,

The radioclk Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 554111 (and maybe other similar bugs).

The i18n team is now hunting the very last bits of missing localization
and your package went on our radar. You may have uploaded recently but,
unfortunately for you, you then got *another* l10n bug report.

So, sorry for this, but the radar beeped at your package and here am I
with an NMU intent...:-)

I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian
i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
for radioclk in order to fix this as well as all pending translations
for the debconf templates.

Of course, an upload made by you would even be better...:-)

Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider
building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical.

The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it
or if I don't receive any answer in 11 days) is roughly the following:

 Tuesday, July 20, 2010   : send this notice
 Saturday, July 24, 2010       : post a NMU announcement to debian-i18n with you
                 (maintainer) CC'ed
                 this can happen earlier if the maintainer agrees
                 In such case, the deadlines below will also
                 happen earlier
 Friday, July 30, 2010       : (midnight) deadline for receiving translation updates
 Saturday, July 31, 2010       : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/7-day
                 send the NMU patch to the BTS
 Saturday, August 07, 2010       : NMU reaches incoming

If you intent to upload yourself, please notify me so that I interrupt
the process on my side. Please also don't upload without a discussion
with me. Some translators might send a few new translations and I can handle
a round of translation updates for you. Really, don't upload silently...:-)

In case I upload an NMU, I will subscribe to the Package Tracking System for
radioclk and follow its life for 60 days after my NMU in order to fix
any issue potentially introduced by my upload.

Let me know, as soon as possible, if you have any kind of objection to this
process.

If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package
alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now.

-- 

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 554111@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: debian-i18n@lists.debian.org

Cc: 554111@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the radioclk package

Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:36:17 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear maintainer of radioclk and Debian translators,

Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the radioclk Debian
package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation update in the BTS.

I announced the intent to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
for this package in order to fix this long-time pending localization
bug as well as all other pending translations.

The package maintainer agreed for the NMU or did not respond in four
days, so I will proceed with the NMU.

The full planned schedule is available at the end of this mail.

The package is currently translated to: 
cs de es fr ja nl pt pt_BR ru sv vi

Among these, the following translations are incomplete: <none>

If you did any of the, currently incomplete, translations you will get
ANOTHER mail with the translation to update.

Other translators also have the opportunity to create new translations
for this package. Once completed, please send them as a bug report
against the radioclk package so I can incorporate them in the build.

The deadline for receiving updates and new translations is Thursday, July 29, 2010. If you
are not in time you can always send your translation to the BTS.

The POT file is attached to this mail.

If the maintainer objects to this process I will immediately abort my NMU
and send him/her all updates I receive.

Otherwise the following will happen (or already has):

 Tuesday, July 20, 2010   : send the first intent to NMU notice to
                 the package maintainer.
 Friday, July 23, 2010       : send this notice
 Thursday, July 29, 2010       : (midnight) deadline for receiving translation updates
 Friday, July 30, 2010       : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/7-day
                 send the NMU patch to the BTS
 Friday, August 06, 2010       : NMU uploaded to incoming

Thanks for your efforts and time.

-- 


-- 

[templates.pot (text/plain, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 554111@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>

To: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>, 554111@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#554111: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the radioclk package

Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:34:41 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 07:36:17PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:

> The package maintainer agreed for the NMU or did not respond in four
> days, so I will proceed with the NMU.

I did respond, and hope to make the upload myself.

-- 
Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #25 received at 554111@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>, 554111@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#554111: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the radioclk package

Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:33:07 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Quoting Paul Martin (pm@debian.org):
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 07:36:17PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> 
> > The package maintainer agreed for the NMU or did not respond in four
> > days, so I will proceed with the NMU.
> 
> I did respond, and hope to make the upload myself.


Oh, sorry for this, Paul. Of course, no problem with this. My spam
filter was apprently too aggressive..:-)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #30 received at 554111@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: 554111@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Patch for the l10n upload of radioclk

Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:38:29 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear maintainer of radioclk,

On Friday, July 23, 2010 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload a
NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial
notice sent on Tuesday, July 20, 2010.

We finally agreed that you would do the update yourself at the end of
the l10n update round.

That time has come.

To help you out, here's the patch which I would have used for an NMU.
Please feel free to use all of it...or only the l10n part of it.

The corresponding changelog is:


Source: radioclk
Version: 1.0.ds1-7.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:37:20 -0400
Closes: 554111
Changes: 
 radioclk (1.0.ds1-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix pending l10n issues. Debconf translations:
   * Japanese (Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP)).  Closes: #554111

-- 

[radioclk.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #35 received at 554111@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: 554111@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#554111: Patch for the l10n upload of radioclk

Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:54:21 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubulle@debian.org):
> 
> Dear maintainer of radioclk,
> 
> On Friday, July 23, 2010 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload a
> NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial
> notice sent on Tuesday, July 20, 2010.
> 
> We finally agreed that you would do the update yourself at the end of
> the l10n update round.


Hello Paul,

Any news from this?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #40 received at 554111@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>

To: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>, 554111@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#554111: Patch for the l10n upload of radioclk

Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:54:59 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 08:54:21AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:

> Any news from this?

Uploaded just now.

-- 
Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #45 received at 554111-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>

To: 554111-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#554111: fixed in radioclk 1.0.ds1-8

Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:02:13 +0000

Source: radioclk
Source-Version: 1.0.ds1-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
radioclk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

radioclk_1.0.ds1-8.diff.gz
  to main/r/radioclk/radioclk_1.0.ds1-8.diff.gz
radioclk_1.0.ds1-8.dsc
  to main/r/radioclk/radioclk_1.0.ds1-8.dsc
radioclk_1.0.ds1-8_i386.deb
  to main/r/radioclk/radioclk_1.0.ds1-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 554111@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Paul Martin <pm@debian.org> (supplier of updated radioclk package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:52:06 +0100
Source: radioclk
Binary: radioclk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.ds1-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Changed-By: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Description: 
 radioclk   - simple ntp refclock daemon for MSF/WWVB/DCF77 time signals
Closes: 554111
Changes: 
 radioclk (1.0.ds1-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Debconf translation upload only:
     + Japanese (Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP)).  (Closes: #554111)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 9298779c1df5b998579aac7f3cba90da3734f8d6 1655 radioclk_1.0.ds1-8.dsc
 c7445bd4d6ec3be89ff490756fba8041443aec0b 10568 radioclk_1.0.ds1-8.diff.gz
 10bce7c48846317d55a3c1c0d72e901a2cd4cfb2 21596 radioclk_1.0.ds1-8_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 bbe82cff4062fb69a083b80de83764849bd59d0326f4fd59decd9d10f2d7f88e 1655 radioclk_1.0.ds1-8.dsc
 63c169d0bead7c83faedc3b8303bc5d7144fcd623ff7ba5234d3992ec2fc9921 10568 radioclk_1.0.ds1-8.diff.gz
 7d4d1709567d72d558de5f4bd5001daefd49fb1f88e79124d2f5d7a738eda881 21596 radioclk_1.0.ds1-8_i386.deb
Files: 
 7ceec08eaf0f63bc52a8b845497d4e05 1655 net extra radioclk_1.0.ds1-8.dsc
 aabf6224cbc1ed57dd8c66dfe0d9e596 10568 net extra radioclk_1.0.ds1-8.diff.gz
 a7571d3a2ba74ebf7a89fecc665c090d 21596 net extra radioclk_1.0.ds1-8_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=FNiw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.