Debian Bug report logs -
#553869
replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
Reported by: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:49:34 UTC
Severity: serious
Tags: sid, wheezy
Found in version units/1.87-1
Fixed in version 1.87-2
Done: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded
to John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>:
Bug#553869; Package units.
(Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:49:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>.
(Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:49:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at maintonly@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Package: units
Version: 1.87-1
Severity: important
User: doko@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev
build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the
libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this kind of update.
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, John G. Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>:
Bug#553869; Package units.
(Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:16:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to John G. Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>.
(Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:16:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #10 received at 553869@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
The package still build-depends on libreadline5-dev. Please
change the dependency to libreadline-dev, before libreadline5-dev
isn't built anymore.
Packages which cannot use readline6 (GPLv3) should build-depend
on libreadline-gplv2-dev instead.
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, John G. Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>:
Bug#553869; Package units.
(Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:17:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler):
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to John G. Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>.
(Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:17:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #15 received at 553869@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
units depends on "libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev". Is there some
reason this is not acceptable?
--
John Hasler
jhasler@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, John G. Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>:
Bug#553869; Package units.
(Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:03:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to John G. Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>.
(Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:03:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #20 received at 553869@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On 04/27/2011 11:10 PM, John Hasler wrote:
> units depends on "libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev". Is there some
> reason this is not acceptable?
yes, because buildds still select readline5. please revert the order.
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, John G. Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>:
Bug#553869; Package units.
(Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:24:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to jhasler@debian.org (John Hasler):
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to John G. Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>.
(Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:24:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #25 received at 553869@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Matthias Klose writes:
> ...please revert the order.
Do you mean "reverse the order"?
--
John Hasler
jhasler@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
Request was from Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Sat, 09 Jul 2011 10:48:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Added tag(s) sid and wheezy.
Request was from Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Sat, 09 Jul 2011 10:48:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Reply sent
to Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 07 Aug 2011 11:15:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent
to Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 07 Aug 2011 11:15:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #34 received at 553869-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Version: 1.87-2
* Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>, 2009-11-02, 02:11:
>Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in
>unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev
>build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the
>libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this kind of update.
The current version has:
Build-Depends: libreadline-dev | libreadline6-dev | libreadline5-dev, …
--
Jakub Wilk
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org.
(Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:39:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Wed Oct 11 17:58:03 2017;
Machine Name:
buxtehude
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.