Debian Bug report logs - #548642
transition: liblo

version graph

Package: release.debian.org; Maintainer for release.debian.org is Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>;

Reported by: Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:45:52 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version liblo/0.26~repack-3

Done: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, fsateler@gmail.com, pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#548642; Package release.debian.org. (Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:45:55 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to fsateler@gmail.com, pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:45:56 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: transition: liblo
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:29:25 -0400
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible
with the old one.

Direct reverse dependencies:

ardour
csound
dssi
fluidsynth-dssi
freej
hexter
jamin
ll-scope
nekobee
qtractor
rosegarden*
sineshaper*
whysynth
wsynth-dssi
xsynth-dssi



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#548642; Package release.debian.org. (Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:42:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:42:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 548642@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>
To: 548642@bugs.debian.org
Cc: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: transition: liblo
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:40:13 -0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 16:29 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
> this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
> liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
> However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
> liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
> NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
> should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible
> with the old one.

Ping?

> 
> Direct reverse dependencies:
> 
> ardour
> csound
> dssi
> fluidsynth-dssi
> freej
> hexter
> jamin
> ll-scope
> nekobee
> qtractor
> rosegarden*
> sineshaper*
> whysynth
> wsynth-dssi
> xsynth-dssi
> 
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#548642; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:18:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:18:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 548642@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>
To: 548642@bugs.debian.org
Cc: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: transition: liblo
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:52:51 -0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:40 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 16:29 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
> > this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
> > liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
> > However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
> > liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
> > NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
> > should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible
> > with the old one.
> 
> Ping?

Again? Someone in here?


-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#548642; Package release.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:39:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:39:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 548642@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>
To: 548642@bugs.debian.org
Cc: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: transition: liblo
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:38:08 -0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the
current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and
schedule binNMUs?

csound
dssi
fluidsynth-dssi
freej
hexter
jackbeat*
jamin
ll-scope
nekobee
qtractor
rosegarden*
sineshaper*
whysynth
wsynth-dssi
xsynth-dssi


* These packages need sourceful uploads because they build-depend on a
versioned liblo0-dev. Bugs have already been filed for these (530852,
530859 and 571961).

-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#548642; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:06:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:06:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #25 received at 548642@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>
To: Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>
Cc: 548642@bugs.debian.org, pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#548642: transition: liblo
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:05:23 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com> writes:
> As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the
> current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and
> schedule binNMUs?

Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #271:
The kernel license has expired
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#548642; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to 548642@bugs.debian.org:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #30 received at 548642@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
To: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>
Cc: Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>, 548642@bugs.debian.org, pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#548642: transition: liblo
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:22:01 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:05:23AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com> writes:
>> As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the
>> current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and
>> schedule binNMUs?
>
>Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead.

Excellent!

Thanks for checking it, and for your great release management work in 
general.

 - Jonas

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#548642; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:39:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:39:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #35 received at 548642@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>
To: "Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt" <he@ftwca.de>
Cc: 548642@bugs.debian.org, pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#548642: transition: liblo
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:33:56 -0300
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 06:05, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de> wrote:
> Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com> writes:
>> As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the
>> current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and
>> schedule binNMUs?
>
> Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead.

liblo 0.26~repack-3 has been uploaded a few hours ago.

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#548642; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:51:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:51:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #40 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#548642: transition: liblo
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:47:51 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Package: src:liblo
Version: 0.26~repack-3
Severity: serious

Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 06:05, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de> wrote:
>> Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com> writes:
>>> As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the
>>> current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and
>>> schedule binNMUs?
>> Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead.
> liblo 0.26~repack-3 has been uploaded a few hours ago.

Doesn't build on mips* now, I fear you will need to do another upload:
| dpkg-buildpackage: source package liblo
| dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.26~repack-3
| dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture mipsel
|  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
| debian/rules:22: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/copyright-check.mk: No such file or directory
| make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/copyright-check.mk'.  Stop.
| dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2

Marc
-- 
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
283: whoami
       Whoami ist nur was für Leute mit Alzheimer! (Begründung von
       Microsoft Deutschland für das Entfernen des Befehls aus Windows NT)
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>:
You have taken responsibility. (Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:09:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:09:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #45 received at 548642-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>
To: 548642-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#548642: transition: liblo
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:07:10 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de> writes:
> Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com> writes:
>> As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the
>> current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and
>> schedule binNMUs?
> Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead.

It's now in testing. Wasn't smooth, but is finished now.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #78:
Yes, yes, its called a desgin limitation
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:35:24 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Sat Apr 19 20:00:11 2014; Machine Name: beach.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.