Debian Bug report logs - #540060
error in pgadmin3

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <ivan.s.b@gmail.com>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: error in pgadmin3

Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:31:27 +0200

Package: libwxgtk2.8-0
Version: 2.8.7.1-2
Severity: serious

libwxbase2.8-0 2.8.7.1-1.1 -> 2.8.7.1-2

Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module":
libcanberra-gtk-module.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory

pgadmin3: relocation error: pgadmin3: symbol
_ZN21wxMemoryFSHandlerBase19AddFileWithMimeTypeERK8wxStringPKvmS2_,
version WXU_2.8.5 not defined in file libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 with link
time reference

and pgadmin not working

after downgrading to -1
I just get the warning and pgadmin works again.

-- 
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it

Message #10 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ryan Niebur <ryanryan52@gmail.com>

To: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <ivan.s.b@gmail.com>

Cc: 540060@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: error in pgadmin3

Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:24:10 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

hm, pgadmin3 will at least open for me. what steps did you have to do
to reproduce this? and which architecture are you on?

-- 
_________________________
Ryan Niebur
ryanryan52@gmail.com

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk>

To: 540060@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: error in pgadmin3

Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:15:17 +0100

Hi,

Borked for me also (amd64):
----
alex@berk:~$ uname -a
Linux berk 2.6.30.4 #8 SMP Sun Aug 2 18:53:03 BST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
alex@berk:~$ dpkg -s libwxgtk2.8-0 | grep Version
Version: 2.8.7.1-2
alex@berk:~$ dpkg -s pgadmin3 | grep Version
Version: 1.10.0-1
----

----
alex@berk:~$ pgadmin3 
pgadmin3: relocation error: pgadmin3: symbol _ZN21wxMemoryFSHandlerBase19AddFileWithMimeTypeERK8wxStringPKvmS2_, version WXU_2.8.5 not defined in file libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 with link time reference
----

Downgrading to libwxbase2.8-0_2.8.7.1-1.1_amd64.deb (testing) 'fixes' 
the problem for me, but I get no warnings.

Let me know what tests you might want me to do :)

Cheers

-- 
Alexander Clouter
.sigmonster says: "You must have an IQ of at least half a million."  -- Popeye

Message #20 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <ivan.s.b@gmail.com>

To: 540060@bugs.debian.org

Subject: amd64

Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 22:24:37 +0200

The arch is amd64.

Sorry your email got lost. I didn't notice there were news on the
issue.

-- 
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it

Message #25 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>

To: 540060@bugs.debian.org, 540060-submitter@bugs.debian.org, ryanryan52@gmail.com

Subject: Re: error in pgadmin3

Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:26:55 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

It's likely that pgadmin3 should have been rebuilt after the latest wxwidgets2.8
upload.

Cheers,
Giuseppe.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #33 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>

To: 540060@bugs.debian.org, 540060-submitter@bugs.debian.org, ryanryan52@gmail.com

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: error in pgadmin3

Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:09:43 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

reassign 540060 pgadmin3
found 540060 1.10.0-1
thanks

Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
> It's likely that pgadmin3 should have been rebuilt after the latest wxwidgets2.8
> upload.

Yes, I confirm that, I rebuilt pgadmin3 and it works perfectly.


Cheers,
Giuseppe.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #47 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at>

To: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>, 540060@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 540060-submitter@bugs.debian.org, ryanryan52@gmail.com

Subject: Re: Bug#540060: error in pgadmin3

Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:55:08 +0200

* Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it> [2009-08-08 14:09:43 CEST]:
> Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
> > It's likely that pgadmin3 should have been rebuilt after the latest wxwidgets2.8
> > upload.
> 
> Yes, I confirm that, I rebuilt pgadmin3 and it works perfectly.

 Beg your pardon, but that sounds rather like the ABI of wxwidgets2.8
has changed - and then it's not pgadmin3's job to fix it, rather the
library should bump its compatibility level, not?

 Can this please get investigated properly? I don't object to a
scheduled binNMU of pgadmin3 (given that there won't be any source
changes needed), but if wxwidgets2.8 changes its ABI/API it shouldn't do
that in disguise.

 Thanks,
Rhonda

Message #61 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>

To: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at>

Cc: 540060@bugs.debian.org, 540060-submitter@bugs.debian.org, ryanryan52@gmail.com

Subject: Re: Bug#540060: error in pgadmin3

Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:44:49 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Gerfried Fuchs ha scritto:
>  Beg your pardon, but that sounds rather like the ABI of wxwidgets2.8
> has changed - and then it's not pgadmin3's job to fix it, rather the
> library should bump its compatibility level, not?
> 
>  Can this please get investigated properly? I don't object to a
> scheduled binNMU of pgadmin3 (given that there won't be any source
> changes needed), but if wxwidgets2.8 changes its ABI/API it shouldn't do
> that in disguise.

You are right, but I don't think my small patch[1] introduced in the latest
security/QA upload caused an API breakage...

_ZN21wxMemoryFSHandlerBase19AddFileWithMimeTypeERK8wxStringPKvjS2_@WXU_2.8
2.8.7.1-2  and
_ZN21wxMemoryFSHandlerBase19AddFileWithMimeTypeERK8wxStringPKvjS2_@WXU_2.8.5
2.8.7.1-1

I have no idea... Is it possible that something changed with symbol mangling in
latest gcc-4.3 version?

[1]http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/wxwidgets2.8/2.8.7.1-2/CVE-2009-2369.dpatch

Cheers,
Giuseppe.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #69 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ryan Niebur <ryanryan52@gmail.com>

To: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>

Cc: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at>, 540060@bugs.debian.org, 540060-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#540060: error in pgadmin3

Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:51:06 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi!

On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 08:44:49PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Gerfried Fuchs ha scritto:
> >  Beg your pardon, but that sounds rather like the ABI of wxwidgets2.8
> > has changed - and then it's not pgadmin3's job to fix it, rather the
> > library should bump its compatibility level, not?
> > 
> >  Can this please get investigated properly? I don't object to a
> > scheduled binNMU of pgadmin3 (given that there won't be any source
> > changes needed), but if wxwidgets2.8 changes its ABI/API it shouldn't do
> > that in disguise.
> 
> You are right, but I don't think my small patch[1] introduced in the latest
> security/QA upload caused an API breakage...
> 
> _ZN21wxMemoryFSHandlerBase19AddFileWithMimeTypeERK8wxStringPKvjS2_@WXU_2.8
> 2.8.7.1-2  and
> _ZN21wxMemoryFSHandlerBase19AddFileWithMimeTypeERK8wxStringPKvjS2_@WXU_2.8.5
> 2.8.7.1-1
> 
> I have no idea... Is it possible that something changed with symbol mangling in
> latest gcc-4.3 version?
> 
> [1]http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/wxwidgets2.8/2.8.7.1-2/CVE-2009-2369.dpatch
> 

since amd64 seems to be the only architecture with (known) problems,
and that the version that was built on the uploaders machine, I am
suspecting it was a build problem caused by the uploaders machine. I'm
working on (waiting for) wx to rebuild on my amd64 and then I'll test
to see if that fixes it.

Cheers,
Ryan

-- 
_________________________
Ryan Niebur
ryanryan52@gmail.com

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #77 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>

To: Ryan Niebur <ryanryan52@gmail.com>

Cc: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at>, 540060@bugs.debian.org, 540060-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#540060: error in pgadmin3

Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:54:08 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Ryan Niebur ha scritto:
> since amd64 seems to be the only architecture with (known) problems,


No, unfortunately I was able to reproduce this issue on my i386 machine.

Cheers,
Giuseppe.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #85 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>

To: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at>

Cc: 540060@bugs.debian.org, 540060-submitter@bugs.debian.org, ryanryan52@gmail.com

Subject: Re: Bug#540060: error in pgadmin3

Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 01:55:03 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
> _ZN21wxMemoryFSHandlerBase19AddFileWithMimeTypeERK8wxStringPKvjS2_@WXU_2.8
> 2.8.7.1-2  and
> _ZN21wxMemoryFSHandlerBase19AddFileWithMimeTypeERK8wxStringPKvjS2_@WXU_2.8.5
> 2.8.7.1-1

It seems that something changed in binutils, testcase:

squeeze, binutils 2.19.51.20090723-1:

$ cat test.c
int test(void)
{
	        return 1;
}

int test_new(void)
{
	        return 2;
}

$ cat test.version
TEST_1.0.1 {
        *new*;
};

TEST_1.0 {
        global: *;
};

$ gcc -c -fPIC test.c
$ ld -shared -o test.so -version-script test.version test.o
$ objdump -T test.so |grep test
test.so:     file format elf32-i386
00000210 g    DF .text	0000000a  TEST_1.0    test
0000021a g    DF .text	0000000a  TEST_1.0    test_new



but in lenny, binutils 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7:

# objdump -T test.so |grep test
test.so:     file format elf32-i386
00000210 g    DF .text	0000000a  TEST_1.0    test
0000021a g    DF .text	0000000a  TEST_1.0.1  test_new

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #93 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>

To: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at>

Cc: 540060@bugs.debian.org, ryanryan52@gmail.com, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#540060: error in pgadmin3

Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:32:35 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

clone 540060 -1
reassign -1 binutils
retitle -1 version script commands not handled correctly in sid/squeeze
severity -1 grave
thanks


Hi,

please see the testcase below

Cheers,
Giuseppe.


Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
> Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
>> _ZN21wxMemoryFSHandlerBase19AddFileWithMimeTypeERK8wxStringPKvjS2_@WXU_2.8
>> 2.8.7.1-2  and
>> _ZN21wxMemoryFSHandlerBase19AddFileWithMimeTypeERK8wxStringPKvjS2_@WXU_2.8.5
>> 2.8.7.1-1
> 
> It seems that something changed in binutils, testcase:
> 
> squeeze, binutils 2.19.51.20090723-1:
> 
> $ cat test.c
> int test(void)
> {
> 	        return 1;
> }
> 
> int test_new(void)
> {
> 	        return 2;
> }
> 
> $ cat test.version
> TEST_1.0.1 {
>         *new*;
> };
> 
> TEST_1.0 {
>         global: *;
> };
> 
> $ gcc -c -fPIC test.c
> $ ld -shared -o test.so -version-script test.version test.o
> $ objdump -T test.so |grep test
> test.so:     file format elf32-i386
> 00000210 g    DF .text	0000000a  TEST_1.0    test
> 0000021a g    DF .text	0000000a  TEST_1.0    test_new
> 
> 
> 
> but in lenny, binutils 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7:
> 
> # objdump -T test.so |grep test
> test.so:     file format elf32-i386
> 00000210 g    DF .text	0000000a  TEST_1.0    test
> 0000021a g    DF .text	0000000a  TEST_1.0.1  test_new
> 

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #100 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>

To: 540060@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#540060: error in pgadmin3

Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:42:58 +0200

reply from upstream: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10518

The linker script shown has two global wildcard matches.  As the ld info doc
says, this is slightly crazy.  They both match "test_new", so which one should
ld choose?  The most specific match?  How do you do that in general?  eg. is
"tes*" a better match than "*new" for "test_new"?  (If we make a special case
for "*", why stop there?)

Message #105 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>

To: 540751@bugs.debian.org, 540060@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System <control@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: version script commands not handled correctly in sid/squeeze

Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:08:53 +0200

severity 540751 normal
tag 540751 + wontfix
thanks

the proposed solution is to avoid the two global wildcard matches.

upstream comment:
The linker script shown has two global wildcard matches.  As the ld info doc
says, this is slightly crazy.  They both match "test_new", so which one should
ld choose?  The most specific match?  How do you do that in general?  eg. is
"tes*" a better match than "*new" for "test_new"?  (If we make a special case
for "*", why stop there?)

From section 3.9, ld info manual:
   When the linker finds a symbol defined in a library which is not
specifically bound to a version node, it will effectively bind it to an
unspecified base version of the library.  You can bind all otherwise
unspecified symbols to a given version node by using `global: *;'
somewhere in the version script.  Note that it's slightly crazy to use
wildcards in a global spec except on the last version node.  Global
wildcards elsewhere run the risk of accidentally adding symbols to the
set exported for an old version.  That's wrong since older versions
ought to have a fixed set of symbols.

Message #126 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>

To: 540060@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Ryan Niebur <ryanryan52@gmail.com>, Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at>

Subject: Re: error in pgadmin3

Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:01:36 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

#540751 was fixed, so a binNMU of wxwidgets2.8 should fix this issue.

Cheers,
Giuseppe.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #131 received at 540060@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ryan Niebur <ryanryan52@gmail.com>

To: 540060@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: error in pgadmin3

Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:17:19 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 07:01:36PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> #540751 was fixed, so a binNMU of wxwidgets2.8 should fix this issue.
> 

and then binnmu the things that were built against the broken
wxwidgets2.8. I'll mail the release team. also, we could just
bump the build deps and revert my (now broken) patch in the
upload in git, and upload that as usual.

-- 
_________________________
Ryan Niebur
ryanryan52@gmail.com

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #138 received at 540060-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ryan Niebur <ryan@debian.org>

To: 540060-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: these were fixed by binnmus a while ago

Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:52:17 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

-- 
_________________________
Ryan Niebur
ryanryan52@gmail.com

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.