Debian Bug report logs - #538736
should xdigger be dropped from Debian?

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gonéri Le Bouder <goneri@rulezlan.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: should xdigger be dropped from Debian?

Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:45:51 +0200

Package: xdigger
Version: 1.0.10-13
Severity: important

xdigger is really oudated and there is much better "alternative" in
Debian. Should we continue to spend time for that?

       Gonéri

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-rc3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xdigger depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.9-21     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libx11-6                      2:1.2.2-1  X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6                      2:1.0.4-1  X11 miscellaneous extension librar

xdigger recommends no packages.

xdigger suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Message #10 received at 538736@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

To: Gonéri Le Bouder <goneri@rulezlan.org>

Cc: 538736@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: should xdigger be dropped from Debian?

Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:39:30 +0200

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 06:45:51PM +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> Package: xdigger
> Version: 1.0.10-13
> Severity: important
> 
> xdigger is really oudated and there is much better "alternative" in
> Debian. Should we continue to spend time for that?

This really should be removed.

Cheers,
        Moritz

Message #15 received at 538736@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Barry deFreese <bdefreese@verizon.net>

To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, 538736@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Gonéri Le Bouder <goneri@rulezlan.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#538736: should xdigger be dropped from Debian?

Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:22:38 -0400

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 06:45:51PM +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
>   
>> Package: xdigger
>> Version: 1.0.10-13
>> Severity: important
>>
>> xdigger is really oudated and there is much better "alternative" in
>> Debian. Should we continue to spend time for that?
>>     
>
> This really should be removed.
>
> Cheers,
>         Moritz
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-games-devel mailing list
> Pkg-games-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-games-devel
>
>   
Removal filed.

Barry

Message #20 received at 538736-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marco Rodrigues <gothicx@sapo.pt>

To: 538736-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Package xdigger has been removed from Debian

Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:26:33 +0100

Version: 1.0.10-13+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/538736 in Debian BTS
against the package xdigger. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/538935. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.