Debian Bug report logs - #493645
RFP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd

Package: wnpp; Maintainer for wnpp is wnpp@debian.org;

Reported by: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>

Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 20:12:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Reply or subscribe to this bug.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to debian-devel@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:09:51 +0100
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>

* Package name    : nostromo
  Version         : 1.8.6
  Upstream Author : Marcus Glocker <marcus@nazgul.ch>
* URL             : http://www.nazgul.ch/dev.html
* License         : MIT
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : small, simple, fast and secure httpd

 Runs as a single process, handling connections with select. For CGIs
 and directory listing it forks. Supports HTTP/1.1, CGI/1.1, chroot,
 setuid, basic authentication, SSL, IPv6, custom repsonses, aliases, and
 virtual hosts.


A prerelease test version of the package resides on:
http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/unstable

Seems smaller than lighttpd and looks on first impressions more secure
than thttpd. At least nicer looking code. I have in mind embedding
nhttpd on small low powered devices.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>
To: hendry@iki.fi
Cc: 493645@bugs.debian.org
Subject: nostromo vs boa?
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:43:52 +0200
Hello Kai!

Regarding your intent to package nostromo...
I see your point in the gap between thttpd and lighttpd, but could you
please summarize why you would choose it over something like boa?
What are the main differences and why would you choose one over the
other? From a quick look at the description they seem very similar.

--
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "Kai Hendry" <hendry@iki.fi>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Kai Hendry" <hendry@iki.fi>
To: "Andreas Henriksson" <andreas@fatal.se>, 493645@bugs.debian.org
Cc: neumann@lostwebsite.net, "Anselm R Garbe" <garbeam@gmail.com>, daniel@debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#493645: nostromo vs boa?
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:33:22 +0100
First I somehow missed boa. :)

A friend asked me to package nostromo, so I just did it and announced
the ITP just in case someone was interested. I might not upload it to
Debian.

Anyway, boa has two problems after a quick look at the source. It's 7k
SLOC is twice that of nostromo. Also it has not been maintained by
upstream for 3+ years. http://www.boa.org/news.html

Boa's code looks quite good. Boa being alike nostromo in being select
driven as opposed to fork. Select driven is especially important for
devices with low resources as forks are expensive.

I might give boa a try nonetheless for a better comparison.

Kind regards,




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>
To: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>
Cc: 493645@bugs.debian.org, neumann@lostwebsite.net, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam@gmail.com>, daniel@debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#493645: nostromo vs boa?
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:08:56 +0200
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 09:33:22AM +0100, Kai Hendry wrote:
> Boa's code looks quite good. Boa being alike nostromo in being select
> driven as opposed to fork. Select driven is especially important for
> devices with low resources as forks are expensive.
[...]

I'm a bit familiar with boa, using it on an embedded system. I have no
idea about options and can't really judge it at all. Mostly asked
because maybe I could consider switching to nostromo if you had any
convincing arguments over other similar webservers (like boa). ;)

Please note that the source tarball is tainted by both CVS directories
and binaries, and thus likely needs to be repackaged for
DFSG-cleanliness.

I'd also like to request that you please mention both "nostromo" and
"nhttpd" in the package description to make it easy to find. Apparently
both names are in use...

Sorry for not having something more valueable then nitpicking to offer.

--
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to daniel@debian.org:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #25 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
To: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>
Cc: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>, 493645@bugs.debian.org, neumann@lostwebsite.net, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#493645: nostromo vs boa?
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:15:21 +0200
Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Please note that the source tarball is tainted by both CVS directories
> and binaries, and thus likely needs to be repackaged for
> DFSG-cleanliness.

while i agree that having cvs meta data in a tarball is ugly and should
be avoided when doing the checkout to produce the tarball oneself, it's
not necessary in order to meet DFSG.

same with the binaries. if all binaries which end up in the .deb are
rebuild during te build process of the package, *and* all sources for
those binaries are included, they don't need to be removed in order to
meet DFSG.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. (Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:27:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. (Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:27:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #30 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org>
To: 493645@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:12:56 +0100
Are there any new news regarding this matter?

I tried Kai's nhttpd package from http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/, but it
seems he is building it with Webconverger installed.

Could someone please list the points that stop it from integration
into Debian?

At present I am aware of the following issues:

  1. Man pages pointo /usr/local instead of /usr.
  2. Webconverger webpages are included.
  3. Document root is /srv/webc (see also 2.) instead of /var/www.
  4. Tarball contains CVS directories.
  5. BSD authentication is enabled (it just fails always) even if it's
     not available.
  6. Nostromo uses it's own logging framework instead of syslog.

Regards,
Matthias-Christian




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. (Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:57:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "Kai Hendry" <hendry@iki.fi>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. (Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:57:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #35 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Kai Hendry" <hendry@iki.fi>
To: "Matthias-Christian Ott" <ott@mirix.org>, 493645@bugs.debian.org, daniel@debian.org
Cc: "Marcus Glocker" <marcus@nazgul.ch>
Subject: Re: Bug#493645: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:52:01 +0000
Hey guys,

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org> wrote:
> Are there any new news regarding this matter?

http://git.debian.org/?p=users/kai-guest/nostromo/.git

> I tried Kai's nhttpd package from http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/, but it
> seems he is building it with Webconverger installed.

Ah yes, that's built with the Webconverger branch of mine. Ignore it.
Use the git repo master branch.

> Could someone please list the points that stop it from integration
> into Debian?

I need sponsorship. Last weekend Daniel Bauman agreed to this. I think. :)

> At present I am aware of the following issues:
>  1. Man pages pointo /usr/local instead of /usr.

Fixed this.

>  2. Webconverger webpages are included.
>  3. Document root is /srv/webc (see also 2.) instead of /var/www.

Ignore.

>  4. Tarball contains CVS directories.

I need to remind Marcus about that.

>  5. BSD authentication is enabled (it just fails always) even if it's
>     not available.

Not sure about BSD authentication, but HTTP auth does work. I've
tested it. I need to compile a manpage for ncrypt mind.

>  6. Nostromo uses it's own logging framework instead of syslog.

I think I have sorted logging out. Been ironing out a logrotate config
issue lately mind.

Thanks for you interest in this. I am hoping to get this done by the
end of the year. If you want to move quicker, I'm happy to take
patches and offers of help, or give up the package to you if needs be.
It's an excellent httpd!

Kind regards,




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. (Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:57:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to daniel@debian.org:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. (Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:57:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #40 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
To: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>
Cc: Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org>, 493645@bugs.debian.org, Marcus Glocker <marcus@nazgul.ch>
Subject: Re: Bug#493645: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:53:32 +0100
Kai Hendry wrote:
> I need sponsorship. Last weekend Daniel Bauman agreed to this. I think. :)

i did, yes (and i though i was pretty clear :). however, since you said
this is of no big hurry for you, i will have a look at it next week :)

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. (Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:54:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. (Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:54:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #45 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org>
To: 493645@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#493645: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:50:46 +0100
Kai Hendry wrote:
> Hey guys,

Hi,
 
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org> wrote:
> > Are there any new news regarding this matter?
> 
> http://git.debian.org/?p=users/kai-guest/nostromo/.git

I will have a look at it.
 
> > I tried Kai's nhttpd package from http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/, but it
> > seems he is building it with Webconverger installed.
> 
> Ah yes, that's built with the Webconverger branch of mine. Ignore it.
> Use the git repo master branch.

OK, thanks for pointing this out.
 
> > Could someone please list the points that stop it from integration
> > into Debian?
> 
> I need sponsorship. Last weekend Daniel Bauman agreed to this. I think. :)

+1
 
> [...] 
> >  5. BSD authentication is enabled (it just fails always) even if it's
> >     not available.
> 
> Not sure about BSD authentication, but HTTP auth does work. I've
> tested it. I need to compile a manpage for ncrypt mind.

There's some ugly #ifdef __OpenBSD__ in the authentication source code
that just returns false on all other systems. I think it should be
disabled at all.
 
> >  6. Nostromo uses it's own logging framework instead of syslog.
> 
> I think I have sorted logging out. Been ironing out a logrotate config
> issue lately mind.

I'm currently testing my syslog version of nhttpd, but I have to admit
that virtual hosting doesn't fit well into the concept but I will simply
prefix the log entries with the virtual host, so that on can easily
filter the messages via grep or an advanced logging daemon.
 
> Thanks for you interest in this. I am hoping to get this done by the
> end of the year. If you want to move quicker, I'm happy to take
> patches and offers of help, or give up the package to you if needs be.
> It's an excellent httpd!

I think it's just a small httpd (in my opinion it has still too many
features and LOC) that fits quite well on my small webserver. It's not
an extraordinary peace of software, but it works.
 
> Kind regards,

Regards,
Matthias-Christian




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. (Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:42:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "Kai Hendry" <hendry@iki.fi>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. (Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:42:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #50 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Kai Hendry" <hendry@iki.fi>
To: daniel@debian.org
Cc: "Matthias-Christian Ott" <ott@mirix.org>, "Marcus Glocker" <marcus@nazgul.ch>, 493645@bugs.debian.org
Subject: nostromo debian packaging review
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:40:32 +0000
Hi Daniel,

Could you please review the Debian packaging here of nostromo:

http://git.debian.org/?p=users/kai-guest/nostromo

I quickly created a manpage for the crypt tool ncrypt.1. I don't know
if there was a better way to do it instead. Like redirect ncrypt.1 to
nhttpd.8 ?

Also I'm not 100% sure about debian/logrotate. So please check that over.

No hurry and thanks again!




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. (Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:42:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "Kai Hendry" <hendry@iki.fi>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. (Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:42:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #55 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Kai Hendry" <hendry@iki.fi>
To: 493645@bugs.debian.org
Cc: daniel@debian.org
Subject: Fwd: Thanks for nostromo-1.8.7.tar.gz
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:40:24 +0000
Oh I noticed that the nostromo packaging fails to build on amd64. The
problem is something I forwarded upstream last month. However upstream
says Debian is doing it wrong! ;)
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/kai-guest/nostromo

So should there be a Debian patch for -Wall?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marcus Glocker <marcus@nazgul.ch>
Date: Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: Thanks for nostromo-1.8.7.tar.gz
To: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>


On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:08:26PM +0000, Kai Hendry wrote:

> ssh marcus@hetty.webconverger.com
> pass: nazgul
>
> Thanks!

OK, I have found out that it seems off_t is defined as `long int'
instead `long long int'.  IMO this is wrong, but I am no Linux/Debian
specialist.  I haven't seen that problem with other Linux distris yet.

You can make a simple workaround by removing the compiler option
`-Wall' in nostromo/src/nhttpd/GNUmakefile from CCFLAGS, then it
should compile.

Regards,
Marcus




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. (Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:21:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. (Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:21:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #60 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org>
To: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>, 493645@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#493645: Fwd: Thanks for nostromo-1.8.7.tar.gz
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:20:07 +0100
Kai Hendry wrote:
> Oh I noticed that the nostromo packaging fails to build on amd64. The
> problem is something I forwarded upstream last month. However upstream
> says Debian is doing it wrong! ;)
> http://git.debian.org/?p=users/kai-guest/nostromo

Did they explain how to do it correctly?
 
> So should there be a Debian patch for -Wall?

Makes no sense to me.
 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marcus Glocker <marcus@nazgul.ch>
> Date: Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Thanks for nostromo-1.8.7.tar.gz
> To: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:08:26PM +0000, Kai Hendry wrote:
> 
> > ssh marcus@hetty.webconverger.com
> > pass: nazgul
> >
> > Thanks!
> 
> OK, I have found out that it seems off_t is defined as `long int'
> instead `long long int'.  IMO this is wrong, but I am no Linux/Debian
> specialist.  I haven't seen that problem with other Linux distris yet.

I don't know to which line he's refering, but it shouldn't matter if
the source code uses off_t, if it's a long or long long. Can someone
explain this to me or point me to the relevant file and line?
 
> You can make a simple workaround by removing the compiler option
> `-Wall' in nostromo/src/nhttpd/GNUmakefile from CCFLAGS, then it
> should compile.

Sounds wrong to me since -Wall just displays warning messages. I think
the error will persist, but is not reported and therefore the source
code compiles.
 
> Regards,
> Marcus
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, send mail to 493645-unsubscribe@bugs.debian.org.




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. (Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:39:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "Kai Hendry" <hendry@iki.fi>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. (Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:39:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #65 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Kai Hendry" <hendry@iki.fi>
To: "Matthias-Christian Ott" <ott@mirix.org>
Cc: 493645@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#493645: Fwd: Thanks for nostromo-1.8.7.tar.gz
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:38:21 +0000
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@mirix.org> wrote:
>> So should there be a Debian patch for -Wall?
> Makes no sense to me.

Of course I mean -Werror. Forgive me. :)

I'll ask around some Debian types regarding this problemo.




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. (Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:36:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>. (Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:36:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #70 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>
To: Marcus Glocker <marcus@nazgul.ch>
Cc: 493645@bugs.debian.org, daniel@debian.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: off_t
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:32:27 +0100
Great, thanks Marcus!

Just updated my package:
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/kai-guest/nostromo

Now I'm running on my server. Lets see how it does for awhile.

Still need to arrange a sponsor for Debian. :-)




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>:
Bug#493645; Package wnpp. (Tue, 25 May 2010 17:23:45 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. (Tue, 25 May 2010 17:23:45 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #75 received at 493645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
To: 493645@bugs.debian.org
Cc: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: nostromo: changing back from ITP to RFP
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:06:14 +0000
retitle 493645 RFP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd
noowner 493645
thanks

Hi,

This is an automatic email to change the status of nostromo back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 12 months.

If you are still interested in adopting nostromo, please send a mail to
<control@bugs.debian.org> with:

 retitle 493645 ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd
 owner 493645 !
 thanks

However, it is not recommended to keep ITP for a long time without acting on
the package, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from
packaging that software. It is also a good idea to document your progress on
this ITP from time to time, by mailing <493645@bugs.debian.org>.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>




Changed Bug title to 'RFP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd' from 'ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd' Request was from Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 25 May 2010 17:28:27 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>. Request was from Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 25 May 2010 17:28:27 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Fri Apr 18 11:36:05 2014; Machine Name: beach.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.