Debian Bug report logs - #492837
mozilla-bookmarksftp: Please update to ff3

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: giggz <giggzounet@gmail.com>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: mozilla-bookmarksftp: Please update to ff3

Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:51:20 +0200

Package: mozilla-bookmarksftp
Version: 1.0.2-6
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

This plugin is great!!! but with ff3 it doesn' work anymore. Could
please do something magical to solve this problem ???

Regards,
Guillaume


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages mozilla-bookmarksftp depends on:
ii  iceweasel                     3.0.1-1    lightweight web browser based on M

mozilla-bookmarksftp recommends no packages.

mozilla-bookmarksftp suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Message #10 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: bug #492837

Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:58:06 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I was gonna look at this on Ubuntu's end to see if i can get it fixed
than ask for it to be fixed in Debian. I have a couple of extensions to
get out first, just found problems with one i thought was ready. I will
try to look at it by end of month as it stands. Someone can feel free to
edit the install.rdf to include ff3 as needed and see if it is compliant
with it.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #15 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>

To: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>, 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: bug #492837

Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:24:05 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I wonder if any fork from this project is still alive...
there was a fork
Bookmark Sync and Sort
which also got somewhat abandoned and then
PlaceSync appeared (which is a cut version of Sync and Sort)
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8379
also there is
SyncPlaces 
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8426

but both are young projects... 

the best alternative imho is foxmarks but I am not sure if they finally
implemented non-foxmarks-server approach... actually they do already
http://wiki.foxmarks.com/wiki/Foxmarks:_Frequently_Asked_Questions#Using_Other_Servers
(FTP and WebDAV are supported), so I guess properly packaged foxmarks
might be a good replacement for bookmarksftp

actually there is RFP #482938 

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, John Vivirito wrote:

> I was gonna look at this on Ubuntu's end to see if i can get it fixed
> than ask for it to be fixed in Debian. I have a couple of extensions to
> get out first, just found problems with one i thought was ready. I will
> try to look at it by end of month as it stands. Someone can feel free to
> edit the install.rdf to include ff3 as needed and see if it is compliant
> with it.




-- 
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student  Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
        101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW:     http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: bug #492837

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:51:24 -0400

Ok im working on placesync at this time. IMHO mozilla-bookmarksftp and
just add placesync but im not a debian dev so i cant really do much. I
have debian rules on how to do it (what hoops i have to run through)

What would you like to do drop mozillabook* and add placesync in its place?

Message #25 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: bug #492837

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:25:27 -0400

I would like to clear up my last post it was middle of night and i was
extremely tired the post should read:

v so i cant really do much.Ok im working on placesync at this time. IMHO dropping 
mozilla-bookmarksftp and add placesync in its place. but im not a Debi an Dev so i cant 
really make decisions. I need to know what i need to do when i am done with it im 
looking at being done with it today. (what hoops i have to run through)

What would you like to do drop mozillabook* and add placesync in its place? 
Or should i build the newest version of mozilla-bookmarksftp. If mozilla-bookmarksftp 
is broken and not the latest version i would like to start over with new version if 
that is the way to go


-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

Message #30 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: bug #492837

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:46:09 -0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I like the foxmarks idea better so i will start working on that today
after i get more sleep.

- --
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkjPnHsACgkQ9Plt3HZNXhPrvwCfQwUIIbrsl9Jt1qTIjyPf8G+Y
gwcAni32WnF9l5g0ojT5XPLjnmBqGCv/
=tGJx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #35 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>

To: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>, 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: bug #492837

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:44:51 -0400

the problem that there is no 'newer version' of mozilla-bookmarksftp... 

the fact that you are not debian dev means close to nothing ;-) if you
package anything - let me know -- I will inspect it and whenever
everything is good enough to appear in debian -- I would be happy to
sponsor your upload into debian

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, John Vivirito wrote:

> I would like to clear up my last post it was middle of night and i was
> extremely tired the post should read:
-- 
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student  Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
        101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW:     http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

Message #40 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: bug 492837

Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 04:30:39 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Thanks for helping me get it in archives. Im waiting on a reply to an
email i sent to upstream authoer about licensing and hopfully a CVS or
SVN. but can use .xpi if needed.
we can fix mozilla-bookmarksftp but since no newer version than IMHO it
should be replaved by Foxmarks. let me know if *-bookmarks should be
kept and i will be glad to try and update the install.rdf and hop it
works but it should.

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #45 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: bug #492837

Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:07:47 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

>
> the problem that there is no 'newer version' of mozilla-bookmarksftp... 
>
> the fact that you are not debian dev means close to nothing  ;-)  if you
> package anything - let me know -- I will inspect it and whenever
> everything is good enough to appear in debian -- I would be happy to
> sponsor your upload into debian
>
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, John Vivirito wrote:
>
>   
>> > I would like to clear up my last post it was middle of night and i was
>> > extremely tired the post should read:
>>     
On the Ubuntu side of extensions we are not packaging non-free
extensions at this time. If you are than i should be able to do it for
you. Please let me know what you want to do, but whatever extension you
want i will work on it, If all info is available than it should only
take a few hours to package test, I still need to use mbox that may be
todays work

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #50 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: mozilla-bookmarksftp: Please update to ff3

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:18:07 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

foxmarks seems to be what im looking into. im waiting for upstream to
package license with .xpi or source and will work on it.

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #55 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Chanoch (Ken) Bloom" <kbloom@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Severity

Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:13:55 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

severity 492837 grave
tags 492837 etch-ignore
thanks

I'm elevating the severity of this bug to grave (makes the package in
question unusable or mostly so...) because iceweasel 3 is in both
lenny and sid, so this package really should be removed from lenny if
it's not updated.

--Ken

-- 
Chanoch (Ken) Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory.
Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute of Technology.
http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #68 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Thomas Viehmann <tv@beamnet.de>

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org

Cc: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: remove mozilla-bookmarksftp from lenny

Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:13:45 +0200

Hi,

according to the discussion in #492837, mozilla-bookmarksftp is
completely unusable with the lenny's version of iceweasel and "fixing"
will be finding a new upstream (because it's dead) and uploading that.
That's too invasive at this point of the release cycle, so
mozilla-bookmarksftp should be removed from lenny if not lenny and unstable.

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/

Message #73 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>

To: Thomas Viehmann <tv@beamnet.de>, 492837@bugs.debian.org

Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: remove mozilla-bookmarksftp from lenny

Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:44:24 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Indeed it is useless in lenny, thus should be removed from release for
the sake of clarity, but I would drag it within sid -- may be some
effort would appear to fix it up to be compatible with firefox 3.0, so
we could patch it within Debian.

Cheers
Yarik

On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote:

> Hi,

> according to the discussion in #492837, mozilla-bookmarksftp is
> completely unusable with the lenny's version of iceweasel and "fixing"
> will be finding a new upstream (because it's dead) and uploading that.
> That's too invasive at this point of the release cycle, so
> mozilla-bookmarksftp should be removed from lenny if not lenny and unstable.

> Kind regards

> T.
-- 
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student  Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
        101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW:     http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #78 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org

Cc: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>, 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: remove mozilla-bookmarksftp from lenny

Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:34:40 +0200

* Yaroslav Halchenko [Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:44:24 -0400]:

> Indeed it is useless in lenny, thus should be removed from release for
> the sake of clarity, but I would drag it within sid -- may be some
> effort would appear to fix it up to be compatible with firefox 3.0, so
> we could patch it within Debian.

Ok, removal hint added.

Thanks,

> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote:

> > Hi,

> > according to the discussion in #492837, mozilla-bookmarksftp is
> > completely unusable with the lenny's version of iceweasel and "fixing"
> > will be finding a new upstream (because it's dead) and uploading that.
> > That's too invasive at this point of the release cycle, so
> > mozilla-bookmarksftp should be removed from lenny if not lenny and unstable.

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
                                       Listening to: Miguel Bosé - Bambú

Message #83 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: bug #492837

Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:41:23 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Alexander has renamed the package and updated it as well as i did
without rename. Not sure how to proceed at this time but I'm sure thats
not far away
-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #88 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: bug #492837

Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:49:36 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I have pushed this to my Launchpad PPA, We are at this time unable to
push Debian sources to PPA'a but i added iceweasel and friends to
depends, i may be pushing a version with 3.5 and 3.6 in depends but i
haven't done that yet. Does Debian have package mozilla-devscripts or is
that just us? You can find binaries and source at the following link:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/+archive/ppa
the only thing i cna think of that would be an issue is the
mozilla-devscripts depend but that is easy enough to change.


-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #93 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: bug #492837

Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:52:56 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Sorry forgot. I am willing to take over maintaining it, since upstream
died. I'm still learning Debian's bug tracker its a bit different than
ours, so if there are other bugs on this let me know maybe i can sneak
them in. I emailed asac already since he left for the day, and let him
know what i was thinking.
-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #98 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>

To: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>, 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: bug #492837

Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:08:36 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

have you come up with a patch which makes it work (not only to get
loaded/enabled) for FF3?

On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, John Vivirito wrote:

> Sorry forgot. I am willing to take over maintaining it, since upstream
> died. I'm still learning Debian's bug tracker its a bit different than
> ours, so if there are other bugs on this let me know maybe i can sneak
> them in. I emailed asac already since he left for the day, and let him
> know what i was thinking.
-- 
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student  Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-1412 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
        101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW:     http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #103 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>, 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: bug #492837

Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:37:11 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 04/08/2009 03:08 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> have you come up with a patch which makes it work (not only to get
> loaded/enabled) for FF3?
> 
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, John Vivirito wrote:
> 
>> Sorry forgot. I am willing to take over maintaining it, since upstream
>> died. I'm still learning Debian's bug tracker its a bit different than
>> ours, so if there are other bugs on this let me know maybe i can sneak
>> them in. I emailed asac already since he left for the day, and let him
>> know what i was thinking.
No need for a patch its just adjusting one line in the install.rdf
I will upload a diff of the changes, I just have to figure out how to
upload to bug tracker. If i figure it out in a few minutes ill upload it
tonight if not maybe before weekend.

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #108 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>, 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Here is the debdiff of bookmarksftp changes

Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:02:08 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

This should be what you need let me know if it fails to attach
-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

[bookmarksftp_1.0.2-6ubuntu3~jjv1.dsc (text/plain, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #113 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: bug #492837

Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:16:03 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Lets try this again wrong file first time
-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

[debdiff (text/plain, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #118 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>

To: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>, 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: bug #492837

Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:59:23 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

so you just altered allowed version... did you check if that worked...
ie you could sync bookmarks? I think I have tried pure version mangling
some time (it was prior FF 3.0 iirc) and I could start bookmarksftp but
could not sync... so in other words it was useless

On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, John Vivirito wrote:

> Lets try this again wrong file first time
-- 
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student  Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-1412 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
        101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW:     http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #123 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: re: mozilla-bookmarksftp: Please update to ff3

Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:07:17 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I have tested this and it fails to work as expected. This is something i
will not pursue (this one package) I have yet found a free version of
this type of extension.If you are able to find one that is free let me
know and i will look at it.

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #128 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Olaf Schulz <bugreports@village.in-berlin.de>

To: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: please add dependency << 3

Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:14:25 +0200

Hi all

please add a version dependency to this package:
It should depend on firefox | iceweasel  version less than 3

FF 3 organizes its bookmarks in a very different manner (sqlite),
so bookmarksftp (I used and liked it) cannot be simply "fixed" to work 
with newer firefoxes and iceweasels.

As iceweasel 2.x will very probably not be contained in future 
versions of Debian (and is not contained in the currently-stable 
etch), I suggest to drop this package. (is this the right place for a 
request like this?)

On the upstream page https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/14 
I found a pointer to 
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8426 'SyncPlaces', a 
new firefox addon doing a similar job for firefox|iceweasel 3.0 and 
3.5.

Just my 2 ¢

Olaf

Message #133 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>

To: Olaf Schulz <bugreports@village.in-berlin.de>, 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: please add dependency << 3

Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:14:41 -0400

yeah -- I've looked at syncplaces before (search in this bugreport) --
it might be a viable substitution indeed

version limitation << 3 -- indeed makes sens -- I guess I will close
this bug with that upload

and indeed we should drop bookmarksftp whenever iceweasel >= 3.0 gets
into testing

thanks ;)
-- 
                                  .-.
=------------------------------   /v\  ----------------------------=
Keep in touch                    // \\     (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko              /(   )\               ICQ#: 60653192
                   Linux User    ^^-^^    [175555]

Message #138 received at 492837@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Olaf Schulz <bugreports@village.in-berlin.de>

To: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>

Cc: 492837@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#492837: please add dependency << 3

Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:59:13 +0200

Hi,

# Yaroslav Halchenko schrieb am 16.08.2009 um 16:14 h

>yeah -- I've looked at syncplaces before (search in this bugreport) --
>it might be a viable substitution indeed
>
>version limitation << 3 -- indeed makes sens -- I guess I will close
>this bug with that upload
>
>and indeed we should drop bookmarksftp whenever iceweasel >= 3.0 gets
>into testing

Iceweasel current is Version: 3.0.6-1 in stable!
So this package does only make sense in oldstable which has 
iceweasel 2.0.x

Olaf

Message #143 received at 492837-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marco Rodrigues <gothicx@sapo.pt>

To: 492837-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Package bookmarksftp has been removed from Debian

Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:14:36 +0000

Version: 1.0.2-6+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/492837 in Debian BTS
against the package bookmarksftp. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/553210. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.