Debian Bug report logs - #488171
bash-completion should not show diff if /etc/bash_completion is unmodified

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: bash-completion: Fails to upgrade

Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:16:23 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: bash-completion
Version: 20060301-4
Severity: important

(I think this is serious, but I'm not sure so I leave this as
important; the version is taken from dpkg -l).

I tried to update bash (via apt-get dist-upgrade) and it prompted me
with the following debconf screen (output reformatted):
Package configuration

Modified configuration file
A new version of configuration file /etc/bash_completion is available,
but the version installed currently has been locally modified.
What would you like to do about bash_completion?
install_new
keep_current
diff
sdiff
shell
Ok

(Previously there was a non-debconf-prompt about those kind of
changes).

Since I wanted to see a diff, but did not know what "sdiff" meant I
tried it by selecting. After pressing enter, nothing happened anymore,
the installation was stuck. To be sure, I let it run for >> 1 hour.

After presseing Ctrl-C I got the following message:
dpkg: error processing bash-completion (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script killed by signal (Interrupt)
....
Errors were encountered while processing:
 bash-completion
 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

I can leave this system in this state for a few days.

It's an headless alpha with current sid (last previous update
yesterday).

-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #10 received at 486702@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com>

To: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>

Cc: 486702@bugs.debian.org, Bash-Completion Developers <bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#486702: bash-completion: Fails to upgrade

Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:23:32 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:16:23 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:

> Package: bash-completion
> Version: 20060301-4
> Severity: important
> 
> (I think this is serious, but I'm not sure so I leave this as
> important; the version is taken from dpkg -l).

I think "important" is ok -- I'll leave other team members decide. :)

> I tried to update bash (via apt-get dist-upgrade) and it prompted me
> with the following debconf screen (output reformatted):
> Package configuration
> 
> Modified configuration file
> A new version of configuration file /etc/bash_completion is available,
> but the version installed currently has been locally modified.
> What would you like to do about bash_completion?
> install_new
> keep_current
> diff
> sdiff
> shell
> Ok
> 
> (Previously there was a non-debconf-prompt about those kind of
> changes).

Yes, I suppose this is related with the use of ucf ("Update Configuration
File"), I didn't do that, so don't ask me how it works :)

> Since I wanted to see a diff, but did not know what "sdiff" meant I
> tried it by selecting. After pressing enter, nothing happened anymore,
> the installation was stuck. To be sure, I let it run for >> 1 hour.
> 
> After presseing Ctrl-C I got the following message:
> dpkg: error processing bash-completion (--configure):
>  subprocess post-installation script killed by signal (Interrupt)
> ....
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  bash-completion
>  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

This seems like a bug in ucf itself -- I don't believe bash-completion is
faulty here. CCing ucf maintainer (hi Manoj).

However, did you retry to upgrade? Please do, and report if anything changed.

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #15 received at 486702@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>

To: David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com>

Cc: 486702@bugs.debian.org, Bash-Completion Developers <bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#486702: bash-completion: Fails to upgrade

Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:50:04 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello David,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:23:32PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> However, did you retry to upgrade? Please do, and report if anything changed.

I tried it again using "sdiff" and it hung again, though I only let it
hang for a few seconds. If you want to debug this, I can keep that
state for a few days, or should I try "diff" instead?

Greetings

              Helge
-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 486702@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com>

To: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>

Cc: 486702@bugs.debian.org, Bash-Completion Developers <bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#486702: bash-completion: Fails to upgrade

Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:53:16 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:50:04 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:

> Hello David,
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:23:32PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > However, did you retry to upgrade? Please do, and report if anything
> > changed.
> 
> I tried it again using "sdiff" and it hung again, though I only let it
> hang for a few seconds. If you want to debug this, I can keep that
> state for a few days, or should I try "diff" instead?

Please, try "diff" -- I don't believe "a few seconds" will be different from "a
few days" :)

"sdiff" is side-by-side diff -- is it possible that your alpha machine is
having problems displaying it? (just a thought)

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #25 received at 486702@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

To: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>

Cc: David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com>, 486702@bugs.debian.org, Bash-Completion Developers <bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#486702: bash-completion: Fails to upgrade

Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:26:04 -0500

On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:50:04 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann
<debian@helgefjell.de> said:  

> Hello David,
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:23:32PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
>> However, did you retry to upgrade? Please do, and report if anything
>> changed.

> I tried it again using "sdiff" and it hung again, though I only let it
> hang for a few seconds. If you want to debug this, I can keep that
> state for a few days, or should I try "diff" instead?

        Do we know which version of ucf is installed at the time of the
 failed upgrade? Old versions of ucf did not use  debconf to display
 results from the diff operations, but left it on the console/xterm.

        That has been fixed in version 3.001, released on May 2007, but
 the version in stable is 2.0020, which has that bug.

        manoj

-- 
Philosophy: unintelligible answers to insoluble problems.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Message #30 received at 486702@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>

To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

Cc: David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com>, 486702@bugs.debian.org, Bash-Completion Developers <bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#486702: bash-completion: Fails to upgrade

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:32:54 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello Manoj,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 06:26:04PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:50:04 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann
> <debian@helgefjell.de> said:  
> > I tried it again using "sdiff" and it hung again, though I only let it
> > hang for a few seconds. If you want to debug this, I can keep that
> > state for a few days, or should I try "diff" instead?
> 
>         Do we know which version of ucf is installed at the time of the
>  failed upgrade? Old versions of ucf did not use  debconf to display
>  results from the diff operations, but left it on the console/xterm.

ii  ucf            3.007          Update Configuration File: preserve user cha

I logged in via ssh from my local console via another machine
( local -> intermediate -> alpha). The local and intermediate machine
run stable, the alpha (where the error occured) is running sid. The
intermediate and alpha do not have X running and xterm is (should) not
be present (should because it might by accident, I can check if
necessary). 

I saw this particular debconf prompt for the first time, up to now I
was always confronted with a text version (which worked fine as well).
I cannot tell, if there is output on some other channel (VT, ..) as I
do not have local access to the alpha.

>         That has been fixed in version 3.001, released on May 2007, but
>  the version in stable is 2.0020, which has that bug.

Looks like I have a fixed version, then.

If there is anything I can try (besides using "diff" instead of
"sdiff") please tell me.

Greetings

         Helge
-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #35 received at 486702@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>

To: 486702@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Happens in changeroot as well

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:55:28 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,
I just set up an x86 changeroot on my amd64 main system. I installed
etch (but no additional packages besides the base system!) and
immediately after chroot change the distribution to sid and ran 
apt-get dist-upgrade.

The upgrade ran fine (except some locale hickups/permission
collissions with grsec). Another all to dist-ugprade requested an
upgrade of bash-completion. This time, the screen mentioned in the
first mail appeared localized (i.e. in German) but the behaviour is
the same: 

If I try to display the changes side by side, the installation hangs
until I press Ctrl-C, then the installation aborts.

The ordinary diff works partially(?), i.e. for long lines I have no
horizontal scroll bar (for example:
 ...
 # user commands see only users
 -complete -u su usermod userdel passwd chage write chfn groups slay w
 +complete -u su usermod userdel passwd chage write chfn groups slay w
 sux
 ...
here it looks like the line is extending beyond the screen, but I'm
not sure, other lines look as if they are wrapped).


Btw. I did *not* modify "/etc/bash_completion" (I just set up this
changeroot) so the detection of "modified files" is broken as well.
Should I clone this bug for that problem?

Greetings

        Helge
-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #40 received at 486702@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Victor Barahona <victor.barahona@uam.es>

To: 486702@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#486702: bash-completion: Fails to upgrade

Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:52:54 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

I have found the same problem.

Maybe this issue is the same that this one?

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470066

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=193694

It seems a interaction problem between ucf and debconf.

Regards.

-- 
Víctor Barahona.
Responsable de Seguridad de la Red de la UAM.
Unidad Técnica de Comunicaciones.
Tecnologías de la Información.
http://rincon.uam.es/dir?cw=870938110351562

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #45 received at 486702@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>

To: David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com>

Cc: 486702@bugs.debian.org, Bash-Completion Developers <bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#486702: bash-completion: Fails to upgrade

Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:21:35 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello David,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:53:16PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:50:04 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:23:32PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > > However, did you retry to upgrade? Please do, and report if anything
> > > changed.
> > 
> > I tried it again using "sdiff" and it hung again, though I only let it
> > hang for a few seconds. If you want to debug this, I can keep that
> > state for a few days, or should I try "diff" instead?
> 
> Please, try "diff" -- I don't believe "a few seconds" will be different from "a
> few days" :)
> 
> "sdiff" is side-by-side diff -- is it possible that your alpha machine is
> having problems displaying it? (just a thought)

I just used "diff" instead of "sdiff" and it worked (as it did
previously now in the x86 chroot). 

For completeness, the following simple steps reproduce it:
Setup up a etch chroot, e.g. by
cdebootstrap --arch=i386 etch /var/chroot/sid http://...

Copy the necessary files inside (fstab, passwd, resolve.conf, ...)
Mount the necessary directories (using --bind), typically proc
Edit sources.list to point to sid
chroot in your new chroot
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
apt-get dist-upgrade
(yes, twice). In the second run, bash_completion will be
installed/upgraded, and the dialogue appears. 

If I hear nothing form you, I'll clone this bug for the prompt. As
shown above, the config file was never changed by me, so no prompt for
an upgrade should be necessary (and looking at the huge diff, I bet
many system administrators will be rather lost as well).

Greetings

             Helge



-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #50 received at 486702@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com>

To: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>

Cc: 486702@bugs.debian.org, Bash-Completion Developers <bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#486702: bash-completion: Fails to upgrade

Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:22 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tags 486702 confirmed
reassign 486702 ucf
thanks

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:21:35 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:

> Hello David,

Hi,

> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:53:16PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:50:04 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:23:32PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > > > However, did you retry to upgrade? Please do, and report if anything
> > > > changed.
> > > 
> > > I tried it again using "sdiff" and it hung again, though I only let it
> > > hang for a few seconds. If you want to debug this, I can keep that
> > > state for a few days, or should I try "diff" instead?
> > 
> > Please, try "diff" -- I don't believe "a few seconds" will be different
> > from "a few days" :)
> > 
> > "sdiff" is side-by-side diff -- is it possible that your alpha machine is
> > having problems displaying it? (just a thought)
> 
> I just used "diff" instead of "sdiff" and it worked (as it did
> previously now in the x86 chroot). 

Uhm, ok.
So, we now have two options:
1) it's an ucf bug
2) it's a sdiff bug.

Since you have an updated ucf version, I really suspect it's a sdiff bug. Does
that screen appear with any other package? If yes, could you try sdiff with
this other package? Does it work "stand-alone" in your chroot? (it does for me)

> For completeness, the following simple steps reproduce it:
> Setup up a etch chroot, e.g. by
> cdebootstrap --arch=i386 etch /var/chroot/sid http://...
> 
> Copy the necessary files inside (fstab, passwd, resolve.conf, ...)
> Mount the necessary directories (using --bind), typically proc
> Edit sources.list to point to sid
> chroot in your new chroot
> apt-get update
> apt-get dist-upgrade
> apt-get dist-upgrade
> (yes, twice). In the second run, bash_completion will be
> installed/upgraded, and the dialogue appears. 

Ok, I can reproduce it.
I'm still of the idea that this is not our fault though, thus I'm reassigning
to ucf. Manoj, please feel free to reassign it elsewhere, if you feel it's not
your fault either (diff?)

> If I hear nothing form you, I'll clone this bug for the prompt.

The prompt is right. I've checked the postinst/postrm scripts, and they do
TheRightThing™.
Probably this is ucf-related -- or probably is just a bug when switching from
debconf to ucf.

> As shown above, the config file was never changed by me,

Yes, ACK.

> so no prompt for an upgrade should be necessary

You're right.

> (and looking at the huge diff, I bet many system administrators will be
> rather lost as well).

Oh, come on, that's not that huge! :p

Ok, jokes aside, I believe that is a bug in etch > sid. We should really try
etch > lenny > sid, and see if this happens.

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #59 received at 486702@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org>

To: David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com>, 486702@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>, Bash-Completion Developers <bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, debconf@packages.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#486702: bash-completion: Fails to upgrade

Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:10:25 +0300

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:00:22AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:21:35 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:

> I just used "diff" instead of "sdiff" and it worked (as it did
> previously now in the x86 chroot). 

> So, we now have two options:
> 1) it's an ucf bug
> 2) it's a sdiff bug.

> > For completeness, the following simple steps reproduce it:
> > Setup up a etch chroot, e.g. by
> > cdebootstrap --arch=i386 etch /var/chroot/sid http://...
> > 
> > Copy the necessary files inside (fstab, passwd, resolve.conf, ...)
> > Mount the necessary directories (using --bind), typically proc
> > Edit sources.list to point to sid
> > chroot in your new chroot
> > apt-get update
> > apt-get dist-upgrade
> > apt-get dist-upgrade
> > (yes, twice). In the second run, bash_completion will be
> > installed/upgraded, and the dialogue appears. 

> I'm still of the idea that this is not our fault though, thus I'm reassigning
> to ucf. Manoj, please feel free to reassign it elsewhere, if you feel it's not
> your fault either (diff?)

FWIW, I think this is a deadlock in debconf with two processes both
blocking to read from the other. It's already reported as #486094 and
#460916 against debconf (and #478659 against bash-completion). There's
some analysis in #460916 from March, and quoting myself there:

> I assume the deadlock occurs because the pipe buffers fill up. Suggest
> cloning to debconf and cutting overly long diff output in ucf. It's not
> like anyone is going to make an informed decision by reading a 100k diff
> presented by debconf...
-- 
Niko Tyni   ntyni@debian.org

Message #74 received at 488171-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>

To: 488171-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#488171: fixed in bash-completion 20080705

Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:47:04 +0000

Source: bash-completion
Source-Version: 20080705

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bash-completion, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bash-completion_20080705.dsc
  to pool/main/b/bash-completion/bash-completion_20080705.dsc
bash-completion_20080705.tar.gz
  to pool/main/b/bash-completion/bash-completion_20080705.tar.gz
bash-completion_20080705_all.deb
  to pool/main/b/bash-completion/bash-completion_20080705_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 488171@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luk Claes <luk@debian.org> (supplier of updated bash-completion package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:14:15 +0200
Source: bash-completion
Binary: bash-completion
Architecture: source all
Version: 20080705
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bash Completion Maintainers <bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
Description: 
 bash-completion - programmable completion for the bash shell
Closes: 463969 487786 487825 488171
Changes: 
 bash-completion (20080705) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ David Paleino ]
   * Added more completions to imagemagick (thanks to Nelson A. de
     Oliveira) (Closes: #487786)
   * Added xrandr completion (thanks to Anton Khirnov) (Closes: #487825)
   * Improving _gdb completion:
     - $filenames to $default (Closes: #463969)
     - also show directory names (i.e. compgen -d) in COMPREPLY.
     - added . to $PATH, to allow debugging "local" executables.
     - do not complete Bash's builtins (thanks to Morita Sho)
 .
   [ Luk Claes ]
   * Remove use of ucf for /etc/bash-completion (Closes: #488171).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 d30c5f40a1a7f1d53a9c7fa9e5499c796a6cfdcc 870 bash-completion_20080705.dsc
 f3713688323722da7e6c5678654e08bd369a29d7 101845 bash-completion_20080705.tar.gz
 4a984c3db151bab32d03ca7c7122ecc276571a1f 89202 bash-completion_20080705_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 1dc9dede10cab55fdb4349d8fe6306533d1ba56b72d6617ddf9e37da475fb74b 870 bash-completion_20080705.dsc
 feb9bffeefacf76431293818683f77f54b9205a1598316a38152bff3ca7d6895 101845 bash-completion_20080705.tar.gz
 8a6280103e49a9d422f9488b2c4cd5883455188791233b936634243a94cab18b 89202 bash-completion_20080705_all.deb
Files: 
 6a82c68d2f19677a385da79e64215b0e 870 shells standard bash-completion_20080705.dsc
 8bc36281bb0567bc67a9083c4c5595a9 101845 shells standard bash-completion_20080705.tar.gz
 9dca889fbcbff51938fe4dc77cba5ddc 89202 shells standard bash-completion_20080705_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkhvhvMACgkQ5UTeB5t8Mo1eXACcCLfvt8ccgjxQR8pS4JR8w9Xe
fpMAoJOc78dH44yDFuG3zdmOZkLrmCn+
=wz/I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.