Debian Bug report logs - #479854
enigmail: Does not support iceape-mailnews

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: enigmail: Does not support iceape-mailnews

Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 01:39:14 +0200

Package: enigmail
Version: 2:0.95.0+1-3.1
Severity: normal

enigmail lists iceape-mailnews as a package it depends on, but does
not install any files under /usr/{lib,share}/iceape or
/var/lib/iceape.  This seems necessary to tell iceape that enigmail is
installed.

In contrast, the package installs files under /usr/lib/icedove.

I tried "cp -a /usr/lib/icedove/extensions /usr/lib/iceape" and
restarted iceape but the OpenPGP menu is still not there.

The upstream web site says that enigmail works with SeaMonkey.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages enigmail depends on:
ii  gnupg                         1.4.6-2.1  GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
ii  iceape-mailnews               1.1.9-3    Iceape Mail & Newsgroups and Addre
ii  libc6                         2.7-10     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.3.0-3  GCC support library
ii  libnspr4-0d                   4.7.0-2    NetScape Portable Runtime Library
ii  libstdc++6                    4.3.0-3    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

enigmail recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

Message #10 received at 479854@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Claudio F Filho <filhocf@openoffice.org>

To: 479854@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Old packages

Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:06:19 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Before, the package 0.94 works fine, but Alexander Sack removed from him 
page[1] this package.
[1]http://people.debian.org/~asac/unstable/

Today, we are without a way to install enigmail in iceape x86_64. In 
i386, is possible to use the xpi in enigmail page.

Best

Claudio

[smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, attachment)]

Message #15 received at 479854@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexander Sack <asac@jwsdot.com>

To: Claudio F Filho <filhocf@openoffice.org>, 479854@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#479854: Old packages

Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:37:21 +0200

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:06:19AM -0400, Claudio F Filho wrote:
> Before, the package 0.94 works fine, but Alexander Sack removed from him  
> page[1] this package.
> [1]http://people.debian.org/~asac/unstable/
>
> Today, we are without a way to install enigmail in iceape x86_64. In  
> i386, is possible to use the xpi in enigmail page.
>

Hard to resurrect as it is atm. If you want to help on getting
enigmail back for seamonkey/iceape, please ping me in
#ubuntu-mozillateam on freenode.

 - Alexander

Message #20 received at 479854@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Randy Conn <archon@calligaster.net>

To: Alexander Sack <asac@jwsdot.com>, 479854@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#479854: Old packages

Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:47:03 +0000

Would it be possible to post it here?  I don't know how many of us there 
are, but I subscribed to 479854 specifically to be notified of a 
solution to adding enigmail to iceape-i386.

Thanks,

Randy

Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:06:19AM -0400, Claudio F Filho wrote:
>   
>> Before, the package 0.94 works fine, but Alexander Sack removed from him  
>> page[1] this package.
>> [1]http://people.debian.org/~asac/unstable/
>>
>> Today, we are without a way to install enigmail in iceape x86_64. In  
>> i386, is possible to use the xpi in enigmail page.
>>
>>     
>
> Hard to resurrect as it is atm. If you want to help on getting
> enigmail back for seamonkey/iceape, please ping me in
> #ubuntu-mozillateam on freenode.
>
>  - Alexander
>
>
>
>
>   

Message #25 received at 479854@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: cbothmer@web.de

To: 479854@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#479854: Old packages

Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:42:20 +0200

Hello Alexander,


I understand if you don't want to support enigmail for iceape. But PLEASE remove the dependency entry suggesting it works.

thanks

cb
____________________________________________________________________
Psssst! Schon vom neuen WEB.DE MultiMessenger gehört? 
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.produkte.web.de/messenger/?did=3123

Message #30 received at 479854@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian Herenz <herenz9@netscape.net>

To: 479854@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Whats the situation?

Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:54:05 +0200

Any updates on thisone here?

Message #35 received at 479854@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>

To: 479854@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug #479854: enigmail: Does not support iceape-mailnews

Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:50:48 +0100

Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:06:19AM -0400, Claudio F Filho wrote:
>> Before, the package 0.94 works fine, but Alexander Sack removed from
him  
>> page[1] this package.
>> [1]http://people.debian.org/~asac/unstable/
>>
>> Today, we are without a way to install enigmail in iceape x86_64. In  
>> i386, is possible to use the xpi in enigmail page.
>>
> Hard to resurrect as it is atm. If you want to help on getting
> enigmail back for seamonkey/iceape, please ping me in
> #ubuntu-mozillateam on freenode.

If I understand Claudio correctly, the bug affects all architectures but
there exists a workaround for i386 only, which is to use upstream's XPI
package instead of the Debian package. Is that correct?

Alexander, what is the problem? I'm a DD, perhaps I can help?

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.

Message #40 received at 479854@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexander Sack <asac@debian.org>

To: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>, 479854@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#479854: Bug #479854: enigmail: Does not support iceape-mailnews

Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:20:50 +0100

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 12:50:48PM +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:06:19AM -0400, Claudio F Filho wrote:
> >> Before, the package 0.94 works fine, but Alexander Sack removed from
> him  
> >> page[1] this package.
> >> [1]http://people.debian.org/~asac/unstable/
> >>
> >> Today, we are without a way to install enigmail in iceape x86_64. In  
> >> i386, is possible to use the xpi in enigmail page.
> >>
> > Hard to resurrect as it is atm. If you want to help on getting
> > enigmail back for seamonkey/iceape, please ping me in
> > #ubuntu-mozillateam on freenode.
> 
> If I understand Claudio correctly, the bug affects all architectures but
> there exists a workaround for i386 only, which is to use upstream's XPI
> package instead of the Debian package. Is that correct?
> 
> Alexander, what is the problem? I'm a DD, perhaps I can help?
> 

iceape has a rotten old extension mechanism. Building enigmail for
that isnt trivial. You can try to resurrect, but i am not sure if its
worth it given that we currently consider to remove iceape from lenny
(lack of manpower to provide security support).


 - Alexander

Message #45 received at 479854-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Willi Mann <willi@wm1.at>

To: 479854-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#479854: fixed in enigmail 2:1.4.1-2

Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 19:02:23 +0000

Source: enigmail
Source-Version: 2:1.4.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
enigmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

enigmail_1.4.1-2.diff.gz
  to main/e/enigmail/enigmail_1.4.1-2.diff.gz
enigmail_1.4.1-2.dsc
  to main/e/enigmail/enigmail_1.4.1-2.dsc
enigmail_1.4.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/e/enigmail/enigmail_1.4.1-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 479854@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Willi Mann <willi@wm1.at> (supplier of updated enigmail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 15:00:12 +0200
Source: enigmail
Binary: enigmail
Architecture: amd64 source
Version: 2:1.4.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexander Sack <asac@debian.org>
Changed-By: Willi Mann <willi@wm1.at>
Closes: 161046 197339 376572 401703 479854
Description: 
 enigmail   - GPG support for Thunderbird and Debian Icedove
Changes: 
 enigmail (2:1.4.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * install.rdf: 1.4.1 works with iceape 2.7
     (Closes: 161046, 197339, 376572, 401703, 479854)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 789d34fb6ca4a30591fd2644dfbe0133c0ead6c2 1867 enigmail_1.4.1-2.dsc
 9794b8f2d1261d5ff4d347d4ada777a900f0d6bd 21771 enigmail_1.4.1-2.diff.gz
 3dfb550bbdbb0762fd33896c495a364ace9716e8 1352228 enigmail_1.4.1-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 7a7fe9e7269e039442a2990df67dae9a6f49d92b92b211dbf676c9fdf2349887 1867 enigmail_1.4.1-2.dsc
 d826c9823bca88ad2852da797620e8dc6586ef7747443ae09e15c7e441a3b7fb 21771 enigmail_1.4.1-2.diff.gz
 3e64003e0ce77b9aeed2df4ecdc2d8738171a7b7efaad9476b94774a8cd1828d 1352228 enigmail_1.4.1-2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 aec8155a63a782e71afb7699c17d800d 1867 mail optional enigmail_1.4.1-2.dsc
 5d8ca4801f41b548417578ec6aaae9d7 21771 mail optional enigmail_1.4.1-2.diff.gz
 6ecb9eb98369cc207e0d360fa4a8ee30 1352228 mail optional enigmail_1.4.1-2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPqBfPAAoJEIy+IZx0V22BcJIQAMQYRlufKS5GEF3tqEoptjKP
mwPJ8x1o2w5RixScG/nkrQz9MvQ6Z15KG3luT7uzPg4iE8YpdvMXo9zQPrLxo1AH
I/kDeO48cF5HbQNZVnbhM2LwQYjNRr5foBDAV0J7476knxyj91KMSHn06fyMIcw+
j9SKGDVpwk4OIgSBfweQEfzbAF1WLh7qhdfl1tUOvomcu1gULiAPVG3zJ3sUT3GS
RBCWV3/Shn1R/CAxeslKtikRq0Iyz0mVEt+GjERP8iiRphwCve90lHocbHKL75vQ
A5JdURtSkEmPj9ag83HR2gGAH+kCmSxlRamZEgo8qJc8bGKdwgGkaAgQQUS/RSU+
UM0uY92WcF6YqsU4rJ7FgtG9blLzQKitl+8E2o0cWQWrCoo9pk0BJMixOcYE+Z2U
gAx/sQsUBxvC8Ef+qhsDfUX79V4q0eqIokmcPlXNjamaBH1GUWpMxTVBPyxCXOau
2KiDNZKmkr9srubK27corwyQjNh+bnkYpj3mtW88tEFnMmy81cKIGn3A/eigtWMb
9cUdx/FAbxdxw7dLdvfn0S8rsQE2OrcUCrp1RsCKHurlZebTZi5mit+TpDrYaLvh
98eeuxv4+FPShbxeSb4o2U5uMIRhqKTZXtPEMFSyXPbr4ML9x57szTGqtEv2LfVV
oJZb910tl06ScpTM+ydX
=hpLO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.