Debian Bug report logs - #476286
javadoc incompatible HTML output

version graph

Package: gjdoc; Maintainer for gjdoc is (unknown);

Reported by: debian@ginguppin.de

Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:57:14 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Fixed in version 0.7.9-4.1+rm

Done: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#476286; Package libjdom1-java. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to debian@ginguppin.de:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: debian@ginguppin.de
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libjdom1-java: apidoc incompatible format
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:55:05 +0200
Package: libjdom1-java
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: normal

the apidocs included seem not to match the format generated by the javadoc tool.
at least eclipse (from eclipse.org) is unable to render it.
see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=226514
for more information.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24.4 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_DK.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libjdom1-java depends on:
ii  sun-java5-jre [java2-runtime] 1.5.0-15-1 Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment (
ii  sun-java6-jre [java2-runtime] 6-05-1     Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment (

libjdom1-java recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#476286; Package libjdom1-java. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #10 received at 476286@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>
To: debian@ginguppin.de, 476286@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#476286: libjdom1-java: apidoc incompatible format
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:29:10 +0200
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:55:05PM +0200, debian@ginguppin.de wrote:
> Package: libjdom1-java
> Version: 1.0-4
> Severity: normal
> 
> the apidocs included seem not to match the format generated by the javadoc tool.
> at least eclipse (from eclipse.org) is unable to render it.
> see
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=226514
> for more information.

We are currently using gjdoc to produce javadocs. It "should" be
compatible. It generates the expected <div class="class
description">...</div> too. There must be some other issue. If you have
time please take a deeper look and we can fix gjdoc to produce more
compatible output.


Cheers,
Michael




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#476286; Package libjdom1-java. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to "arne anka" <debian@ginguppin.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #15 received at 476286@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "arne anka" <debian@ginguppin.de>
To: "Michael Koch" <konqueror@gmx.de>, 476286@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#476286: libjdom1-java: apidoc incompatible format
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:59:34 +0200
i filed a bug against eclipse  
(https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=226514) and given the fact  
that gjdoc claims to be compatible to javadoc up to
 and including version 1.4, the question araises wether gjdoc or eclipse  
do have a compatibility issue -- because docs generated w/ javadoc of 1.4  
work well w/ eclipse i rather think gjdoc might have ...

regards

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:29:10 +0200, Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:55:05PM +0200, debian@ginguppin.de wrote:
>> Package: libjdom1-java
>> Version: 1.0-4
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> the apidocs included seem not to match the format generated by the  
>> javadoc tool.
>> at least eclipse (from eclipse.org) is unable to render it.
>> see
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=226514
>> for more information.
>
> We are currently using gjdoc to produce javadocs. It "should" be
> compatible. It generates the expected <div class="class
> description">...</div> too. There must be some other issue. If you have
> time please take a deeper look and we can fix gjdoc to produce more
> compatible output.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Michael






Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#476286; Package libjdom1-java. (Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:27:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:27:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #20 received at 476286@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>
To: 476286@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libjdom1-java: apidoc incompatible format
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:56:17 +0200
reassign 476286 gjdoc
severity 476286 wishlist
retitle 476286 javadoc incompatible HTML output
thanks

Reassigning since this is not a bug in libjdom1-java.





Bug reassigned from package `libjdom1-java' to `gjdoc'. Request was from Marcus Better <marcus@better.se> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:27:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' Request was from Marcus Better <marcus@better.se> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:27:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Changed Bug title to `javadoc incompatible HTML output' from `libjdom1-java: apidoc incompatible format'. Request was from Marcus Better <marcus@better.se> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:27:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Reply sent to Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:49:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Notification sent to debian@ginguppin.de:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:49:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #31 received at 476286-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
To: 443039-done@bugs.debian.org, 462292-done@bugs.debian.org, 476286-done@bugs.debian.org, 514745-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Subject: gjdoc removed from Debian unstable
Version: 0.7.9-4.1+rm

gjdoc has been removed from Debian unstable: http://bugs.debian.org/577422

Closing its bugs with a Version higher than the last unstable upload.

More information about this script at:
  http://git.debian.org/?p=users/morph/mass-bugs-close.git;a=blob_plain;f=README;hb=HEAD




Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:55:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Tue Oct 3 13:34:36 2023; Machine Name: buxtehude

Debian Bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.