Debian Bug report logs - #471645
Uses obsolete blacklist

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Uses obsolete blacklist

Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:39:39 +0100

Package: policyd-weight
Version: 0.1.14-beta-6
Severity: important
Tags: etch

policyd-weight in the default configuration in stable uses
dynablock.njabl.org which is non-functional. This is fixed
in the version in testing, but I would suggest to fix it
in stable, too (or volatile, perhaps?)

The error indicator in the syslog is somewhat annyoing
(especially since "ERR" matches one of logcheck's "violation"
criterias). Also it is an unneccessary DNS lookup that could
be saved.

Feel free to close this bug if you think this doesn't need to
be fixed in stable and people that are annoyed by it should
create a config file instead.

Gruesse,
	Frank Lichtenheld


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (900, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-rc5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Message #10 received at 471645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Thijs Kinkhorst <thijs@debian.org>

To: 471645@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Uses obsolete blacklist

Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:08:49 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

I wouldn't fix this in etch. As the reporter already said: it can be easily 
fixed through the configuration file; administrators using blacklists should 
be used to updating a configuration file once in a while because it's a fact 
of life that blacklists come and go.

If it would produce actual adverse affects other than a log message, it may be 
worth it, but now I don't see the need to go throug the trouble and risk of a 
stable update.


Thijs

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 471645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jan Wagner <waja@cyconet.org>

To: Thijs Kinkhorst <thijs@debian.org>, 471645@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#471645: Uses obsolete blacklist

Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:17:43 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tags 471645 + wontfix
thanks

Hi there,

On Friday 28 March 2008 10:08, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I wouldn't fix this in etch. As the reporter already said: it can be easily
> fixed through the configuration file; administrators using blacklists
> should be used to updating a configuration file once in a while because
> it's a fact of life that blacklists come and go.
>
> If it would produce actual adverse affects other than a log message, it may
> be worth it, but now I don't see the need to go throug the trouble and risk
> of a stable update.

sorry for the late response. As Frank pointed out himself, it could be easily 
resolved by creating a appropriate config file. For the latest package in 
testing (and lenny) I did leave a note in README.Debian about blocking lists. 
I tag the bug as wontfix and leave it open for documentation purpose as long 
there is support for etch.

With kind regards, Jan.

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #22 received at 471645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jan Wagner <waja@cyconet.org>

To: 471645@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Uses obsolete blacklist

Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:13:28 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi there,

> policyd-weight in the default configuration in stable uses
> dynablock.njabl.org which is non-functional. This is fixed

just fix the issue (and maybe have a look 
into /usr/share/doc/policyd-weight/README.Debian) with:

$ policyd-weight defaults|head -47|tail -10|grep -v "list.dsbl.org"|
grep -v "dynablock.njabl.org" > /etc/policyd-weight.conf 
&& /etc/init.d/policyd-weight restart

With kind regards, Jan.
-- 
Never write mail to <waja@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE
Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #29 received at 471645@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Chris Butler <chrisb@debian.org>

To: Jan Wagner <waja@cyconet.org>, 471645@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#471645: Uses obsolete blacklist

Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:04:49 +0200

fixed 471645 0.1.14.17-4
thanks

Seems like this bug was fixed in 0.1.14 beta-3 according to the upstreamV
changelog. Not quite sure which debian release this corresponds to, but the
above should suffice.

On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:17:43PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
> I tag the bug as wontfix and leave it open for documentation purpose as long 
> there is support for etch.

etch support is long gone - closing this bug.

-- 
Chris Butler <chrisb@debian.org>
  GnuPG Key ID: 4096R/49E3ACD3

Message #34 received at 471645-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>

To: 471645-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Really Close

Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 00:16:23 +0100

Bugs was never marked as done. Do this now.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.