Debian Bug report logs - #469338
unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: José "L. Redrejo" Rodríguez <jredrejo@edu.juntaextremadura.net>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1

Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:30:22 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: unionfs-modules-2.6-amd64
Version: 2:2.6.24-4
Severity: grave

Hi, 
Tested with amd64, 486 & 686 kernel versions. Whenever I try to use
unionfs module I always get the
"unionfs: Unknown symbol release_open_intent" message, so the package is
useless on any arch.

It only happens with current 2.6.24 on sid, with 2.6.22 on lenny it
works without any problem.

Regards.
José L.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #10 received at 469338@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: "José \"L. Redrejo\" Rodríguez" <jredrejo@edu.juntaextremadura.net>, 469338@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#469338: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1

Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:27:17 +0100

tags 469338 +pending
thanks

José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> Tested with amd64, 486 & 686 kernel versions. Whenever I try to use
> unionfs module I always get the
> "unionfs: Unknown symbol release_open_intent" message, so the package is
> useless on any arch.

this is know and was announced, i've added a patch to linux-2.6 trunk to
add that missing symbol. once the next linux-2.6 upload happens, this
will be fixed.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #19 received at 469338@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Pipping <sebastian@pipping.org>

To: 469338@bugs.debian.org

Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 01:04:30 +0200

Any progress? Is there a way to workaround this?
I have the very same problem with

unionfs-modules-2.6.24-1-686 (2.6.24+2.2.3-2.6.24-6)

on Testing.

Message #24 received at 469338@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Fernando Ruza Rodriguez <fernandor@sescam.jccm.es>

To: 469338@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Please post the patch for 2.6

Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:06:33 +0200

Baumann could you post the patch for the kernel 2.6. I need to run
unionfs soon.

Regards,

Fernando.

Message #29 received at 469338@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: fernandor@sescam.jccm.es, 469338@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#469338: Please post the patch for 2.6

Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:31:49 +0200

Fernando Ruza Rodriguez wrote:
> Baumann could you post the patch for the kernel 2.6. I need to run
> unionfs soon.

it's in the kernel trunk svn at debian/patches.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #34 received at 469338@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: José "L. Redrejo" Rodríguez <jredrejo@edu.juntaextremadura.net>

To: 469338@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#469338: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1

Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 10:24:27 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

El mar, 04-03-2008 a las 20:27 +0100, Daniel Baumann escribió:
> tags 469338 +pending
> thanks
> 
> José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> > Tested with amd64, 486 & 686 kernel versions. Whenever I try to use
> > unionfs module I always get the
> > "unionfs: Unknown symbol release_open_intent" message, so the package is
> > useless on any arch.
> 
> this is know and was announced, i've added a patch to linux-2.6 trunk to
> add that missing symbol. once the next linux-2.6 upload happens, this
> will be fixed.
> 

Hi, linux 2.6.26 in Debian already includes your patch. Please, could
you upload the new version of linux-modules-extra for this kernel?

Regards.
José L.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #39 received at 469338@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: "José \"L. Redrejo\" Rodríguez" <jredrejo@edu.juntaextremadura.net>, 469338@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#469338: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1

Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 10:51:06 +0200

José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi, linux 2.6.26 in Debian already includes your patch. Please, could
> you upload the new version of linux-modules-extra for this kernel?

s/2.6.26/2.6.25/

and yes, i'm aware of the things..

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #44 received at 469338-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: 469338-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1

Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 12:11:45 +0200

Version: 2.6.25-1

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #49 received at 469338@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: José "L. Redrejo" Rodríguez <jredrejo@edu.juntaextremadura.net>

To: 469338@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#469338 closed by Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> (reply to daniel@debian.org) (Re: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1 )

Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 13:51:46 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

El mar, 06-05-2008 a las 10:15 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System
escribió:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the unionfs-modules-2.6-amd64 package:
> 
> #469338: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1
> 
> It has been closed by Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> (reply to daniel@debian.org).
> 
> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
> better one in a separate message then please contact Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> (reply to daniel@debian.org) by
> replying to this email.
> 
> 
> mensaje de correo electrónico adjunto
> > --------- Mensaje reenviado --------
> > De: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
> > Responder a: daniel@debian.org
> > Para: 469338-done@bugs.debian.org
> > Asunto: Re: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1
> > Fecha: Tue, 06 May 2008 12:11:45 +0200
> > 
> > Version: 2.6.25-1
> > 

Where can I get version 2.6.25-1? I know you're aware of this
problem ;-) and its solution, but this bug is killing me softly..
(need this module for ltsp setups in my schools)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #54 received at 469338@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: "José \"L. Redrejo\" Rodríguez" <jredrejo@edu.juntaextremadura.net>, 469338@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#469338: closed by Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> (reply to daniel@debian.org) (Re: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1 )

Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 14:45:15 +0200

José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> Where can I get version 2.6.25-1?

2.6.25 got abi bumped to -2, module uploads will follow soon.

> this bug is killing me softly..
> (need this module for ltsp setups in my schools)

as also said last time, just use aufs then. aufs is the better unionfs
anyway.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #59 received at 469338@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: José "L. Redrejo" Rodríguez <jredrejo@edu.juntaextremadura.net>

To: daniel@debian.org

Cc: 469338@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#469338: closed by Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> (reply to daniel@debian.org) (Re: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1 )

Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:40:24 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

El mié, 14-05-2008 a las 14:45 +0200, Daniel Baumann escribió:
> José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> > Where can I get version 2.6.25-1?
> 
> 2.6.25 got abi bumped to -2, module uploads will follow soon.
> 

great


> > this bug is killing me softly..
> > (need this module for ltsp setups in my schools)
> 
> as also said last time, just use aufs then. aufs is the better unionfs
> anyway.
> 

yes, I've tested aufs and worked like a charm, I'll send a patch to the
ltsp maintainer, but I'd prefer to use the debian packages until the
patch is aproved/rejected.

Thanks.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.