Debian Bug report logs - #462631
ITP: paraview -- visualizer for data sets of size varying from small to very large

Display info messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christophe Prud'homme <prudhomm@debian.org>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: ITP: paraview -- ParaView is an open-source, multi-platform application designed to visualize data sets of size varying from small to very large

Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:51:59 +0100

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

--- Please fill out the fields below. ---

   Package name: paraview
        Version: 3.3
Upstream Author: Kitware
            URL: http://www.paraview.org
        License: 
http://www.paraview.org/New/copyright.html
 o ParaView License Version 1.1: 
 o Kitware open-source license
 o Los Alamos license
 o VTK License
 o HDF5 License
 o Xdmf License

    Description: 
ParaView is an open-source, multi-platform application designed to visualize 
data sets of size varying from small to very large. The goals of the ParaView 
project include the following:

    * Develop an open-source, multi-platform visualization application.
    * Support distributed computation models to process large data sets.
    * Create an open, flexible, and intuitive user interface.
    * Develop an extensible architecture based on open standards.

Main animation ParaView runs on distributed and shared memory parallel as well 
as single processor systems and has been succesfully tested on Windows, Mac 
OS X, Linux and various Unix workstations, clusters and supercomputers. Under 
the hood, ParaView uses the Visualization Toolkit as the data processing and 
rendering engine and has a user interface written using Qt.

-- 
Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~prudhomm/
Scientific computing packages maintainer
Fingerprint = 3703 50DE 7A9F 024E 0F26  0D07 A18F B40B D4BE 1450

Message #10 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ondrej Certik <ondrej@certik.cz>

To: 462631@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Christophe Prud'homme <prudhomm@debian.org>

Subject: current state

Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:49:55 +0100

Hi Christophe,

what is the state of this? I also would like to use this package in
Debian very much. I tried to compile from source, but I am getting an
error, that paraview only compiles with QT 4.2, but in Debian there is
QT 4.3.3. Did you succeed compiling it?

Ondrej

Message #19 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christophe Prud'homme <christophe.prudhomme@ujf-grenoble.fr>

To: Ondrej Certik <ondrej@certik.cz>

Cc: 462631@bugs.debian.org, pkg-scicomp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Subject: Re: current state

Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:50:19 +0100

Ondrej,

| what is the state of this? I also would like to use this package in
| Debian very much. I tried to compile from source, but I am getting an
| error, that paraview only compiles with QT 4.2, but in Debian there is
| QT 4.3.3. Did you succeed compiling it?
You have to go for the CVS version. The version I retrieved a few days ago 
from CVS works well with the Qt version in Debian.
I have the configuration relatively complete included MPI support (which I 
need, and paraview is not distributed which mpi support on paraview.org)
Now I need to create the package.

Best regards
C.
-- 
Christophe Prud'homme
Université Joseph Fourier      christophe.prudhomme@ujf-grenoble.fr
LJK - Room 55                  Tel: +33476635497
51, rue des Mathématiques      Fax: +33476631263
BP53X 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9   
      <http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Christophe.Prudhomme/>      
        

Message #24 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Christophe Prud'homme" <prudhomm@debian.org>

To: 462631@bugs.debian.org, pkg-scicomp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] current state

Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:43:32 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Attached the cache file

On Feb 3, 2008 8:50 PM, Christophe Prud'homme <
christophe.prudhomme@ujf-grenoble.fr> wrote:

> Ondrej,
>
> | what is the state of this? I also would like to use this package in
> | Debian very much. I tried to compile from source, but I am getting an
> | error, that paraview only compiles with QT 4.2, but in Debian there is
> | QT 4.3.3. Did you succeed compiling it?
> You have to go for the CVS version. The version I retrieved a few days ago
> from CVS works well with the Qt version in Debian.
> I have the configuration relatively complete included MPI support (which I
> need, and paraview is not distributed which mpi support on paraview.org)
> Now I need to create the package.
>
> Best regards
> C.
> --
> Christophe Prud'homme
> Université Joseph Fourier      christophe.prudhomme@ujf-grenoble.fr
> LJK - Room 55                  Tel: +33476635497
> 51, rue des Mathématiques      Fax: +33476631263
> BP53X 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9
>      <http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Christophe.Prudhomme/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-scicomp-devel mailing list
> Pkg-scicomp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-scicomp-devel

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[CMakeCache.txt (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #29 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Ondrej Certik" <ondrej@certik.cz>

To: "Christophe Prud'homme" <prudhomm@debian.org>

Cc: 462631@bugs.debian.org, pkg-scicomp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] current state

Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 22:42:05 +0100

Hi Christophe,

> > | what is the state of this? I also would like to use this package in
> > | Debian very much. I tried to compile from source, but I am getting an
> > | error, that paraview only compiles with QT 4.2, but in Debian there is
> > | QT 4.3.3. Did you succeed compiling it?
> > You have to go for the CVS version. The version I retrieved a few days ago
> > from CVS works well with the Qt version in Debian.
> > I have the configuration relatively complete included MPI support (which I
> > need, and paraview is not distributed which mpi support on paraview.org)
> > Now I need to create the package.


I need the package soon, at least in some state, so I already created
almost a working solution in our svn. Feel free to base your work on
that, or create a new directory for the cvs version. Also this link
come very handy:

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/paraview/devel/

It contains all the patches that fedora guys had to apply to make it
work. So I am going to apply them to the released version of paraview,
it should do the job mostly.

Ondrej

Message #34 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Ondrej Certik" <ondrej@certik.cz>

To: "Christophe Prud'homme" <prudhomm@debian.org>

Cc: 462631@bugs.debian.org, pkg-scicomp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] current state

Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:49:34 +0100

On Feb 3, 2008 10:42 PM, Ondrej Certik <ondrej@certik.cz> wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> > > | what is the state of this? I also would like to use this package in
> > > | Debian very much. I tried to compile from source, but I am getting an
> > > | error, that paraview only compiles with QT 4.2, but in Debian there is
> > > | QT 4.3.3. Did you succeed compiling it?
> > > You have to go for the CVS version. The version I retrieved a few days ago
> > > from CVS works well with the Qt version in Debian.
> > > I have the configuration relatively complete included MPI support (which I
> > > need, and paraview is not distributed which mpi support on paraview.org)
> > > Now I need to create the package.
>
>
> I need the package soon, at least in some state, so I already created
> almost a working solution in our svn. Feel free to base your work on
> that, or create a new directory for the cvs version. Also this link
> come very handy:
>
> http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/paraview/devel/
>
> It contains all the patches that fedora guys had to apply to make it
> work. So I am going to apply them to the released version of paraview,
> it should do the job mostly.

ok, I applied the fedora patches and the paraview package in our svn
just built on both i386 and amd64 for me. Without MPI.

Ondrej

Message #39 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>

To: 462631@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Linking with libraries already in Debian...

Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:23:00 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi!

Thanks for your ITP bug regarding Paraview!
I hope the packaging is going on well.

I wonder if you managed to link Paraview against (and make it work
properly with) libraries already packaged and included in Debian.

Last time I checked, it seemed Paraview could not be linked with
already installed libraries (without applying heavy modifications).
I think that, from a maintainability/code-duplication point of view,
shipping a special copy of VTK and TclTk just for Paraview would
not be acceptable.  Unfortunately though, last time I checked, Paraview
shipped with special versions of those libraries that had to be
recompiled:
http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/2006-October/003881.html

I hope the situation has improved in the meanwhile: for instance,
Paraview was going to switch from TclTk to Qt and it seems this
transition has already been completed... Is it now possible to easily
link Paraview against an already installed copy of VTK?
Or did you modify CMakeLists.txt in order to let Paraview compile and
link against debianized VTK?

-- 
 http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html
 New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #44 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ondrej Certik <ondrej@certik.cz>

To: 462631@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>, Christophe Prud'homme <prudhomm@debian.org>

Subject: current status

Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:32:21 +0100

Hi Francesco,

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:23:00AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Thanks for your ITP bug regarding Paraview!
> I hope the packaging is going on well.

You can see for yourself. Our svn is here:

XS-Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-scicomp/paraview/
XS-Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-scicomp/paraview/

We welcome any help with the packaging. 

> I wonder if you managed to link Paraview against (and make it work
> properly with) libraries already packaged and included in Debian.

Not yet. Currently we are still trying to make it compile on i386 and
amd64 together with MPI and python. We just succeeded in the compilation
itself, so at least the package builds now.

Unfortunately, the python scripting still isn't working at runtime. When
this is fixed, only then we'll try to build shared libraries and reuse
as much as possible from Debian to reduce the sice of the paraview
binary package (currently 100MB).

> 
> Last time I checked, it seemed Paraview could not be linked with
> already installed libraries (without applying heavy modifications).
> I think that, from a maintainability/code-duplication point of view,
> shipping a special copy of VTK and TclTk just for Paraview would
> not be acceptable.  Unfortunately though, last time I checked,
Paraview
> shipped with special versions of those libraries that had to be
> recompiled:
> http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/2006-October/003881.html
> 
> I hope the situation has improved in the meanwhile: for instance,
> Paraview was going to switch from TclTk to Qt and it seems this
> transition has already been completed... Is it now possible to easily
> link Paraview against an already installed copy of VTK?

I don't know, we didn't try it yet.

> Or did you modify CMakeLists.txt in order to let Paraview compile and
> link against debianized VTK?

Not yet. First we need to make it work with all the features. 
If you would like to help us, it'd be awesome. Feel free to join the 

http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianScientificComputingTeam

where the package is maintained.

Ondrej

Message #49 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>

To: 462631@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: current status

Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:59:51 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:32:21 +0100 Ondrej Certik wrote:

> Hi Francesco,

Hi!  :)

> 
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:23:00AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I wonder if you managed to link Paraview against (and make it work
> > properly with) libraries already packaged and included in Debian.
> 
> Not yet. Currently we are still trying to make it compile on i386 and
> amd64 together with MPI and python. We just succeeded in the compilation
> itself, so at least the package builds now.

I see.

> 
> Unfortunately, the python scripting still isn't working at runtime. When
> this is fixed, only then we'll try to build shared libraries and reuse
> as much as possible from Debian to reduce the sice of the paraview
> binary package (currently 100MB).

Really huge!  I hope you soon manage to successfully package it without
the "extraneous" libraries!

[...]
> If you would like to help us, it'd be awesome.

I'm afraid I do not (yet) have enough packaging experience to help
out...  I should start packaging something easier, first!  ;-)


Bye, and good luck!

-- 
 http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html
 New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #54 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Ondrej Certik" <ondrej@certik.cz>

To: "Francesco Poli" <frx@firenze.linux.it>, 462631@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#462631: current status

Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:10:28 +0100

On Feb 19, 2008 11:59 AM, Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:32:21 +0100 Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> > Hi Francesco,
>
> Hi!  :)
>
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:23:00AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > I wonder if you managed to link Paraview against (and make it work
> > > properly with) libraries already packaged and included in Debian.
> >
> > Not yet. Currently we are still trying to make it compile on i386 and
> > amd64 together with MPI and python. We just succeeded in the compilation
> > itself, so at least the package builds now.
>
> I see.
>
> >
> > Unfortunately, the python scripting still isn't working at runtime. When
> > this is fixed, only then we'll try to build shared libraries and reuse
> > as much as possible from Debian to reduce the sice of the paraview
> > binary package (currently 100MB).
>
> Really huge!  I hope you soon manage to successfully package it without
> the "extraneous" libraries!

Christphe managed to cut the size down to 33MB. Everything seems to work now
just fine, the only exception is python support. Follow our malinglist
for the latest updates.

Ondrej

Message #59 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Ondrej Certik" <ondrej@certik.cz>

To: 462631@bugs.debian.org

Cc: "Christophe Prud'homme" <prudhomm@debian.org>, "Francesco Poli" <frx@firenze.linux.it>

Subject: status update

Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:19:01 +0100

On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Ondrej Certik <ondrej@certik.cz> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 11:59 AM, Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote:
>  > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:32:21 +0100 Ondrej Certik wrote:
>  >
>  > > Hi Francesco,
>  >
>  > Hi!  :)
>  >
>  > >
>  > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:23:00AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
>  > [...]
>  > > > I wonder if you managed to link Paraview against (and make it work
>  > > > properly with) libraries already packaged and included in Debian.
>  > >
>  > > Not yet. Currently we are still trying to make it compile on i386 and
>  > > amd64 together with MPI and python. We just succeeded in the compilation
>  > > itself, so at least the package builds now.
>  >
>  > I see.
>  >
>  > >
>  > > Unfortunately, the python scripting still isn't working at runtime. When
>  > > this is fixed, only then we'll try to build shared libraries and reuse
>  > > as much as possible from Debian to reduce the sice of the paraview
>  > > binary package (currently 100MB).
>  >
>  > Really huge!  I hope you soon manage to successfully package it without
>  > the "extraneous" libraries!
>
>  Christphe managed to cut the size down to 33MB. Everything seems to work now
>  just fine, the only exception is python support. Follow our malinglist
>  for the latest updates.

All major things are fixed now:

* python scripting works
* MPI works
* binary package size is 35MB
* tested on i386 and amd64

what remains:

* manpages
* lintian warnings fixes

The updodate wokring packages compiled for i386 and amd64 can always
be found here:

http://debian.certik.cz/

Feel free to test them and report all bugs to our mailinglist. Also
any help with fixing the remaining things is appreciated.

Ondrej

Ondrej

Message #64 received at 462631@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Christophe Prud'homme" <prudhomm@debian.org>

To: "Ondrej Certik" <ondrej@certik.cz>

Cc: 462631@bugs.debian.org, "Francesco Poli" <frx@firenze.linux.it>

Subject: Re: status update

Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:33:41 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

great work !!!


On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Ondrej Certik <ondrej@certik.cz> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Ondrej Certik <ondrej@certik.cz> wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 2008 11:59 AM, Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote:
> >  > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:32:21 +0100 Ondrej Certik wrote:
> >  >
> >  > > Hi Francesco,
> >  >
> >  > Hi!  :)
> >  >
> >  > >
> >  > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:23:00AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >  > [...]
> >  > > > I wonder if you managed to link Paraview against (and make it
> work
> >  > > > properly with) libraries already packaged and included in Debian.
> >  > >
> >  > > Not yet. Currently we are still trying to make it compile on i386
> and
> >  > > amd64 together with MPI and python. We just succeeded in the
> compilation
> >  > > itself, so at least the package builds now.
> >  >
> >  > I see.
> >  >
> >  > >
> >  > > Unfortunately, the python scripting still isn't working at runtime.
> When
> >  > > this is fixed, only then we'll try to build shared libraries and
> reuse
> >  > > as much as possible from Debian to reduce the sice of the paraview
> >  > > binary package (currently 100MB).
> >  >
> >  > Really huge!  I hope you soon manage to successfully package it
> without
> >  > the "extraneous" libraries!
> >
> >  Christphe managed to cut the size down to 33MB. Everything seems to
> work now
> >  just fine, the only exception is python support. Follow our malinglist
> >  for the latest updates.
>
> All major things are fixed now:
>
> * python scripting works
> * MPI works
> * binary package size is 35MB
> * tested on i386 and amd64
>
> what remains:
>
> * manpages
> * lintian warnings fixes
>
> The updodate wokring packages compiled for i386 and amd64 can always
> be found here:
>
> http://debian.certik.cz/
>
> Feel free to test them and report all bugs to our mailinglist. Also
> any help with fixing the remaining things is appreciated.
>
> Ondrej
>
> Ondrej
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #71 received at 462631-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christophe Prud'homme <prudhomm@debian.org>

To: 462631-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#462631: fixed in paraview 3.2.2-1

Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:10:47 +0000

Source: paraview
Source-Version: 3.2.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
paraview, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

paraview_3.2.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/paraview/paraview_3.2.2-1.diff.gz
paraview_3.2.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/paraview/paraview_3.2.2-1.dsc
paraview_3.2.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/paraview/paraview_3.2.2-1_i386.deb
paraview_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/paraview/paraview_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 462631@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christophe Prud'homme <prudhomm@debian.org> (supplier of updated paraview package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:04:41 +0200
Source: paraview
Binary: paraview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Scientific Computing Team <pkg-scicomp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christophe Prud'homme <prudhomm@debian.org>
Description: 
 paraview   - Parallel Visualization Application
Closes: 462631
Changes: 
 paraview (3.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Ondrej Certik ]
   * Upload to unstable (Closes: #462631)
   * New upstream release
   * debian/patches updated to the 3.2.2 source code
   * cmake2.6.patch added to configure well with cmake2.6
   * libglu1-mesa-dev and libxt-dev added to Build-Depends
   * gcc4.3.patch added with fixes to compile with gcc 4.3
   * Standards-Version bumped to 3.8.0 (no action needed)
   * debian/rules: python 2.4 changed to 2.5
   * README.Debian updated to python2.5
   * lintian override for binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath added
 .
   [Christophe Prud'homme]
   * added paraview manapage by Gerber van der Graaf
   * -DMPI_EXTRA_LIBRARY="/usr/lib/libmpi++.so" added
   * added and install manpages to all binaries
Checksums-Sha1: 
 5348301cb5bf09482a4801bf857176d1eb7f21a3 1485 paraview_3.2.2-1.dsc
 88dbe13e23b09275ddadb8e91dda545df89cbb6b 21415137 paraview_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz
 21715c10b1152c66dcc906afda87eeb709ad8120 13310 paraview_3.2.2-1.diff.gz
 624ec2cafb5d85f34c4c4b57b101b0f69c08b1b6 34541450 paraview_3.2.2-1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 2ebd4b8ae094b1d2d7b00f9095726e49f87160d6dbc74e408e95ab2b1cd43231 1485 paraview_3.2.2-1.dsc
 d068e3c3dfda5ff5cbd43c92219cad37f089d0e177f154a139ba98e10d999340 21415137 paraview_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz
 60de3ff53c36c10ef78e9642a23c9982faa0bccd2ca0251d134832f60bc2c6bc 13310 paraview_3.2.2-1.diff.gz
 b878faded74e6514457c661df75155e26b05ec7fc2e6a06379ecc3bf1fe6e4fa 34541450 paraview_3.2.2-1_i386.deb
Files: 
 7cb384cda53f850d4f1e4828f9a0be48 1485 science extra paraview_3.2.2-1.dsc
 302475b5d1355edf2d1562f0afd7f59f 21415137 science extra paraview_3.2.2.orig.tar.gz
 426a0214beab2098a5560592fd7b0efb 13310 science extra paraview_3.2.2-1.diff.gz
 2c9b3d6cc4918ab7d2639027c097a333 34541450 science extra paraview_3.2.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIVnaMoY+0C9S+FFARAmQ3AJ9MnEYNkK68P5iI2u9/Q1ya/H/NtgCdGBqN
mA5aqoM0VVqj+QNHTKK2Wcg=
=YFu6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.