Debian Bug report logs -
#459352
please provide 640x480 TGA version of debian-blueish-wallpaper.svg for GRUB
Reported by: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:18:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Found in version desktop-base/4.0.4
Fixed in version 4.0.6
Done: "Fathi BOUDRA (IT&L@bs)" <fathi.boudra@orange-ftgroup.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Package: desktop-base
Version: 4.0.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
GRUB 2 supports background images now, in TGA format with 640x480 resolution
and 24-bit depth.
I'd like it to use the default Debian theme image (which I believe at the
moment is debian-blueish-wallpaper.svg; let me know if that changes) when
desktop-base package is installed.
Please, could you provide an image in this format for use with GRUB ?
Attached patch uses imagemagick in postinst to generate it in user's system.
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-amd64
Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages desktop-base depends on:
ii librsvg2-common 2.14.4-3 SAX-based renderer library for SVG
desktop-base recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
[grub.diff (text/plain, attachment)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #8 received at 459352@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Uhm sorry, I overlooked that the resulting image had its bit depth
dramatically degraded.
Here's a new patch, using rsvg for svg->png conversion, then imagemagick
for png->tga.
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
[grub.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Martin Braure de Calignon <braurede@free.fr>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #13 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On sam, 2008-01-05 at 20:12 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: desktop-base
> Version: 4.0.4
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi!
>
> GRUB 2 supports background images now, in TGA format with 640x480 resolution
> and 24-bit depth.
Hi Robert,
> I'd like it to use the default Debian theme image (which I believe at the
> moment is debian-blueish-wallpaper.svg; let me know if that changes) when
> desktop-base package is installed.
Sorry, but I don't understand why you wan't a new image.
Why aren't you using the /boot/grub/splashimages/debian-moreblue-swirl.xpm.gz (package grub-splashimages) ?
It's like the same no ?
> Please, could you provide an image in this format for use with GRUB ?
>
> Attached patch uses imagemagick in postinst to generate it in user's system.
Another question is why not installing it in /boot/grub/splashimages ?
Installing you're image in /usr is quite problematic when using grub
E.g.: I'm using lvm for my /usr partition... So grub can't get the files
on it :-/
I'm really not sure that you're patch should be against desktop-base....
Grub could not be installed so why adding it there ? why not in
grub-splashimages ?
Cheers,
--
Martin
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Martin Braure de Calignon <braurede@free.fr>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #21 received at 459352@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hi!
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:02:20PM +0100, Martin Braure de Calignon wrote:
> > I'd like it to use the default Debian theme image (which I believe at the
> > moment is debian-blueish-wallpaper.svg; let me know if that changes) when
> > desktop-base package is installed.
>
> Sorry, but I don't understand why you wan't a new image.
> Why aren't you using the /boot/grub/splashimages/debian-moreblue-swirl.xpm.gz (package grub-splashimages) ?
> It's like the same no ?
Two reasons:
#1- GRUB Legacy supports images in 14 colors. GRUB 2 supports RGB
(24-bit depth). We really need an image without color degradation.
#2- GRUB 2 uses TGA format for images.
#2 may sound like an arbitrary or useless change, but:
- XPM support has never been part of GRUB Legacy, it's just a patch
in our package (unlike TGA in GRUB 2).
- The images needed to be re-done anyway, because of #1.
> > Please, could you provide an image in this format for use with GRUB ?
> >
> > Attached patch uses imagemagick in postinst to generate it in user's system.
>
> Another question is why not installing it in /boot/grub/splashimages ?
> Installing you're image in /usr is quite problematic when using grub
>
> E.g.: I'm using lvm for my /usr partition... So grub can't get the files
> on it :-/
This decision cannot be taken lightly. On some platforms /boot/grub may be
a separate partition (e.g. to a nvram), and it may be too small to fit such
an image in it. Also, fonts (necessary for graphical mode) are already
being loaded from /usr (when /usr is not accessible, update-grub falls
back to text mode).
Ultimately, we need the flexibility to either setup GRUB to load that file
directly, or setup update-grub to copy it into /boot depending on the
circumstances.
In any case, this is really a GRUB issue and should be resolved separately.
What we need from this package is just to provide Debian's official artwork
in a form GRUB can use.
> I'm really not sure that you're patch should be against desktop-base....
> Grub could not be installed so why adding it there ?
Where else? desktop-base provides that image. It's logical if the image
needs to be converted it's done in either its debian/rules or its postinst
(my patch does the latter).
Also, this feature is not useful to GRUB users that aren't running a desktop
at all. So it fits well with desktop-base's current functionality (i.e. if
desktop-base is installed, you get Debian theming in all parts of Debian).
> why not in
> grub-splashimages ?
Because:
- grub-splashimages is a collection of images for GRUB Legacy. It really
makes no sense to have GRUB 2 users install that package for an image that
is in fact provided from somewhere else. Also, there's a big difference
between a collection of random images that may look nice, and Debian's
official artwork provided by desktop-base. IOW, it's possible we have
a "grub2-splashimages" in the future, but it won't contain Debian's
official artwork, just images that may look nice with GRUB 2.
- desktop-base is already the default for desktop installs. This means that
if desktop-base provides this image, and GRUB is adapted to detect it
and enable it when possible, desktop users will get background image as
default, without bothering non-desktop users with questions, or desktop
users with extra setup.
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Martin Braure de Calignon <braurede@free.fr>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #26 received at 459352@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On dim, 2008-01-06 at 00:37 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> #1- GRUB Legacy supports images in 14 colors. GRUB 2 supports RGB
> (24-bit depth). We really need an image without color degradation.
>
> #2- GRUB 2 uses TGA format for images.
>
> #2 may sound like an arbitrary or useless change, but:
>
> - XPM support has never been part of GRUB Legacy, it's just a patch
> in our package (unlike TGA in GRUB 2).
> - The images needed to be re-done anyway, because of #1.
Ok it's clearer for me now :-)
> This decision cannot be taken lightly. On some platforms /boot/grub may be
> a separate partition (e.g. to a nvram), and it may be too small to fit such
> an image in it. Also, fonts (necessary for graphical mode) are already
> being loaded from /usr (when /usr is not accessible, update-grub falls
> back to text mode).
Ok it makes sense
> > I'm really not sure that you're patch should be against desktop-base....
> > Grub could not be installed so why adding it there ?
>
> Where else? desktop-base provides that image. It's logical if the image
> needs to be converted it's done in either its debian/rules or its postinst
> (my patch does the latter).
>
> Also, this feature is not useful to GRUB users that aren't running a desktop
> at all. So it fits well with desktop-base's current functionality (i.e. if
> desktop-base is installed, you get Debian theming in all parts of Debian).
Ok. So next step is for adding this image for grub by default. Does
grub2 is now the default on debian ? I'm using grub.
> Because:
>
> - grub-splashimages is a collection of images for GRUB Legacy. It really
> makes no sense to have GRUB 2 users install that package for an image that
> is in fact provided from somewhere else. Also, there's a big difference
> between a collection of random images that may look nice, and Debian's
> official artwork provided by desktop-base. IOW, it's possible we have
> a "grub2-splashimages" in the future, but it won't contain Debian's
> official artwork, just images that may look nice with GRUB 2.
Ok for this. I did not aware of grub & grub2... I though "grub" was grub2. that's why I propose this.
Ok too for provides it in debian-desktop while update-grub correctly
copy file where it should
> - desktop-base is already the default for desktop installs. This means that
> if desktop-base provides this image, and GRUB is adapted to detect it
> and enable it when possible, desktop users will get background image as
> default, without bothering non-desktop users with questions, or desktop
> users with extra setup.
I fully agree with you. Sorry for the previous mail, I misunderstood.
So we probably need to fill a wishlist bug on grub to make it adapted to
this behaviour.
Thanks for your work :-)
--
Martin
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #29 received at 459352@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:16:09AM +0100, Martin Braure de Calignon wrote:
> > > I'm really not sure that you're patch should be against desktop-base....
> > > Grub could not be installed so why adding it there ?
> >
> > Where else? desktop-base provides that image. It's logical if the image
> > needs to be converted it's done in either its debian/rules or its postinst
> > (my patch does the latter).
> >
> > Also, this feature is not useful to GRUB users that aren't running a desktop
> > at all. So it fits well with desktop-base's current functionality (i.e. if
> > desktop-base is installed, you get Debian theming in all parts of Debian).
>
> Ok. So next step is for adding this image for grub by default. Does
> grub2 is now the default on debian ? I'm using grub.
No, and it's not ready yet. But it's progressing rapidly, and we hope it'll
be in time for lenny.
> > - desktop-base is already the default for desktop installs. This means that
> > if desktop-base provides this image, and GRUB is adapted to detect it
> > and enable it when possible, desktop users will get background image as
> > default, without bothering non-desktop users with questions, or desktop
> > users with extra setup.
> I fully agree with you. Sorry for the previous mail, I misunderstood.
No problem. I'm always happy to discuss things.
> So we probably need to fill a wishlist bug on grub to make it adapted to
> this behaviour.
No need; when desktop-base provides the requested image, I'll adapt grub2
myself (I'm one of the debian maintainers).
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #32 received at 459352@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:37:40AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Sorry, but I don't understand why you wan't a new image.
> > Why aren't you using the /boot/grub/splashimages/debian-moreblue-swirl.xpm.gz (package grub-splashimages) ?
> > It's like the same no ?
>
> Two reasons:
>
> #1- GRUB Legacy supports images in 14 colors. GRUB 2 supports RGB
> (24-bit depth). We really need an image without color degradation.
>
> #2- GRUB 2 uses TGA format for images.
Ah, there's a third one. GRUB Legacy images are limited by the fact that
GRUB Legacy always uses the same color (white) for text when using background
images. This makes some color combinations in background impossible, because
they'd make the text unreadable. With GRUB 2, one can easily adjust the text
color (16 color choice) that matches better with a particular image.
For debian-blueish-wallpaper.svg I'd use black, if that's fine with you.
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #35 received at 459352@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
New patch that includes update-grub2 hooks (which will be supported by next
upload of grub2).
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
[grub.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]
Tags added: pending
Request was from Fathi BOUDRA <fabo@debian.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:30:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message sent on to Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>:
Bug#459352.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #40 received at 459352-submitter@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hi,
i have commited changes related to this request:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-desktop/packages/trunk/desktop-base/
i didn't applied as it is the patch, as i prefer to provide directly the tga
file instead of generating it and introducing more dependencies.
I kept your GRUB 2 hooks in postinst/prerm.
Please, take a look at the svn repo (revision 97) and let me know if current
changes satisfy your request.
By the way, are you "nyu" ? sune pinged me about a similar discussion.
cheers,
Fathi
Message #43 received at 459352-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:02:19PM +0100, Fathi BOUDRA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have commited changes related to this request:
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-desktop/packages/trunk/desktop-base/
Thank you
> i didn't applied as it is the patch, as i prefer to provide directly the tga
> file instead of generating it and introducing more dependencies.
Ok, either is fine with me. Although I still think it could be a good idea to
save the bandwidth or CD space. Note that "imagemagick" is most likely already
installed in a desktop system, since lots of packages use it (presumably in
the same way). I think it's just a matter of time untill one of those ~110
packages needs rsvg as well (given that "convert" is not usable for handling
SVG).
But then again, it's not a big deal for me.
> I kept your GRUB 2 hooks in postinst/prerm.
>
> Please, take a look at the svn repo (revision 97) and let me know if current
> changes satisfy your request.
I made a mistake. Instead of "2> /dev/null", I wanted to say "> /dev/null".
Also, if you provide the file in the package, I don't think you'll want the
"rm -f /..../...tga" in prerm.
Other than that, I tested the `debian-blueish-wallpaper-640x480.tga' file
you generated and it works fine with GRUB.
> By the way, are you "nyu" ? sune pinged me about a similar discussion.
Yep
Thanks,
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Message sent on to Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>:
Bug#459352.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Fathi BOUDRA <fabo@debian.org>:
Extra info received and filed, but not forwarded.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #51 received at 459352-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
> Ok, either is fine with me. Although I still think it could be a good idea
> to save the bandwidth or CD space.
i saved bandwidth and CD space:
* Using your method rsvg+convert produce an 1.2 Mb TGA file.
* Using rsvg+gimp give me a 340 kb file.
btw, rsvg is used only on gnome-centric desktops.
on KDE desktops, we don't use it so often.
> I made a mistake. Instead of "2> /dev/null", I wanted to say "> /dev/null".
>
> Also, if you provide the file in the package, I don't think you'll want the
> "rm -f /..../...tga" in prerm.
fixed.
cheers,
Fathi
Message sent on to Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>:
Bug#459352.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #57 received at 459352-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:41:07PM +0100, Fathi BOUDRA wrote:
> > Ok, either is fine with me. Although I still think it could be a good idea
> > to save the bandwidth or CD space.
>
> i saved bandwidth and CD space:
> * Using your method rsvg+convert produce an 1.2 Mb TGA file.
> * Using rsvg+gimp give me a 340 kb file.
Ouch
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Message sent on to Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>:
Bug#459352.
(full text, mbox, link).
Reply sent to Fathi Boudra <fabo@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility.
(full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent to Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #65 received at 459352-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Source: desktop-base
Source-Version: 4.0.5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
desktop-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
desktop-base_4.0.5.dsc
to pool/main/d/desktop-base/desktop-base_4.0.5.dsc
desktop-base_4.0.5.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/desktop-base/desktop-base_4.0.5.tar.gz
desktop-base_4.0.5_all.deb
to pool/main/d/desktop-base/desktop-base_4.0.5_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 459352@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Fathi Boudra <fabo@debian.org> (supplier of updated desktop-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:08:23 +0100
Source: desktop-base
Binary: desktop-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.0.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fathi Boudra <fabo@debian.org>
Changed-By: Fathi Boudra <fabo@debian.org>
Description:
desktop-base - common files for the Debian Desktop
Closes: 439838 452425 459352
Changes:
desktop-base (4.0.5) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Fathi Boudra ]
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.7.3.
* Add Homepage field.
* Remove DM-Upload-Allowed: yes; All Uploaders are DD.
* Update kdm theme for KDE 4.
* Use zoom option instead of scaled option in gnome background.
(Closes: #439838)
* Update Makefile to fix wrong permissions on
/usr/share/gnome-background-properties. (Closes: #452425)
* Provide 640x480 TGA version of debian-blueish-wallpaper.svg for GRUB 2.
Thanks to Robert Millan (Closes: #459352)
.
[ Loic Minier ]
* Also use zoom (instead of stretched) for the default wallpaper.
Files:
a2ab9a931cc27db3433993cc09268436 818 x11 optional desktop-base_4.0.5.dsc
a0698d7ffeac473dd70354da7faafd4f 3123775 x11 optional desktop-base_4.0.5.tar.gz
383bab5c1a884324398a1da6a3cff95d 2384618 x11 optional desktop-base_4.0.5_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBR4s70oz1NfZqpXL3AQLn6AP/V3DQxOm4AcjKS2BXl3YHBDSecPptRFCg
xPrzAm1LoklhGMoqKJmXDAso8QffrFza9a85DFkj+usvTgWKXTmVgi1mEHRGfGwV
vpZBgfsNqAgnwp+G52kAd/5272DYND/DFm3JA2L3z05y6Ipx6uxycu4vp0QiO+SE
rJwQrbwneKk=
=/GsJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #68 received at 459352@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
reopen 459352
thanks
It seems you added the "librsvg2-common" dependency, although it is
unneeded after including the tga as static image.
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
Request was from Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:06:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Reply sent to fabo@debian.org:
You have taken responsibility.
(full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent to Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #75 received at 459352-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
> It seems you added the "librsvg2-common" dependency, although it is
> unneeded after including the tga as static image.
no :) librsvg2-common dependency isn't related to #459352.
See previous desktop-base package and changelog:
desktop-base (4.0.0.1) experimental; urgency=high
[ Loic Minier ]
* Depend on librsvg2-common for SVG support.
cheers,
Fathi
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #78 received at 459352@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Another problem: the update-grub2 blurb is run in prerm, where it has no effect
(since the *.tga file is still there, update-grub won't remove the hook from
grub.cfg)
See attached patch.
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
[postrm.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Gustavo Franco <stratus@debian.org>:
Bug#459352; Package desktop-base.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #81 received at 459352@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
reopen 459352
thanks
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:36:03PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > It seems you added the "librsvg2-common" dependency, although it is
> > unneeded after including the tga as static image.
>
> no :) librsvg2-common dependency isn't related to #459352.
Oops, sorry for the confusion. Anyway, there's still the prerm / postrm
problem (see my last mail to this bug).
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
Request was from Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:00:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Reply sent to fathi.boudra@orange-ftgroup.com:
You have taken responsibility.
(full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent to Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #88 received at 459352-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Version: 4.0.6
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org.
(Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:35:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Thu Jan 11 01:37:49 2024;
Machine Name:
bembo
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.