Debian Bug report logs -
#452817
Please support --lzma compression
Reported by: gurkan@phys.ethz.ch
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:51:04 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Found in version upx-ucl/3.01-1
Fixed in version upx-ucl/3.07-4
Done: Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Gürkan Sengün <gurkan@linuks.mine.nu>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Package: upx-ucl
Version: 3.01-1
Severity: wishlist
The debian version doesn't support --lzma compression, could you
please add it?
upx-ucl --lzma
upx-ucl: packer_c.cpp:43: static bool
Packer::isValidCompressionMethod(int): Assertion `0 && "Internal error
- LZMA not compiled in"' failed.
Aborted
Yours,
Guerkan
--
while(!asleep()) sheep++;
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #10 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Gürkan Sengün wrote:
[ CC: to Debian lzma maintainers ]
> Package: upx-ucl
>
> The debian version doesn't support --lzma compression, could you please
> add it?
It's not so simple, because it would require a copy of the lzma sources
and I don't like the idea of distributing external sources with upx.
I noted we have now lzma-dev and lzma-source packages in the
experimental suite, however they contain too little lzma source files to
be useful for upx. The following LZMA sources seem to be needed:
#if (WITH_LZMA >= 0x449)
# define INITGUID 1
//# include "CPP/7zip/Compress/LZMA/LZMADecoder.h"
# include "CPP/7zip/Compress/LZMA/LZMAEncoder.h"
#else
# include "C/Common/MyInitGuid.h"
//# include "C/7zip/Compress/LZMA/LZMADecoder.h"
# include "C/7zip/Compress/LZMA/LZMAEncoder.h"
#endif
--
#if (WITH_LZMA >= 0x449)
# include "C/Alloc.c"
# include "C/7zCrc.c"
# include "C/Compress/Lz/MatchFinder.c"
//# include "CPP/7zip/Common/InBuffer.cpp"
# include "CPP/7zip/Common/OutBuffer.cpp"
# include "CPP/7zip/Common/StreamUtils.cpp"
//# include "CPP/7zip/Compress/LZ/LZOutWindow.cpp"
//# include "CPP/7zip/Compress/LZMA/LZMADecoder.cpp"
# include "CPP/7zip/Compress/LZMA/LZMAEncoder.cpp"
# include "CPP/7zip/Compress/RangeCoder/RangeCoderBit.cpp"
#else
# include "C/Common/Alloc.cpp"
# include "C/Common/CRC.cpp"
//# include "C/7zip/Common/InBuffer.cpp"
# include "C/7zip/Common/OutBuffer.cpp"
# include "C/7zip/Common/StreamUtils.cpp"
# include "C/7zip/Compress/LZ/LZInWindow.cpp"
//# include "C/7zip/Compress/LZ/LZOutWindow.cpp"
//# include "C/7zip/Compress/LZMA/LZMADecoder.cpp"
# include "C/7zip/Compress/LZMA/LZMAEncoder.cpp"
# include "C/7zip/Compress/RangeCoder/RangeCoderBit.cpp"
#endif
#undef RC_NORMALIZE
--
#undef _LZMA_LOC_OPT
#if (WITH_LZMA >= 0x449)
# include "C/Compress/Lzma/LzmaDecode.h"
# include "C/Compress/Lzma/LzmaDecode.c"
#else
# include "C/7zip/Compress/LZMA_C/LzmaDecode.h"
# include "C/7zip/Compress/LZMA_C/LzmaDecode.c"
#endif
One way to fix the bug would be to add the missing files to lzma-dev (or
provide full source in lzma-source). However convincing upstream lzma
authors to provide proper development library would be much better.
Best Regards,
robert
Best Regards,
robert
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Arnaud Fontaine <arnaud@andesi.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #15 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org> writes:
Hello,
>> The debian version doesn't support --lzma compression, could you
>> please add it?
[...]
Robert> One way to fix the bug would be to add the missing files to
Robert> lzma-dev (or provide full source in lzma-source). However
Robert> convincing upstream lzma authors to provide proper
Robert> development library would be much better.
Actually, the upstream author is working on a development library, but
nothing seems to have been released yet. But as you said, it would be
possible to add the missing files to lzma-dev package. However, I don't
know yet when I will have the time to work on it because I have a lot of
work ATM, feel free to submit a bug report on lzma-dev and/or a patch
;).
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Changed Bug submitter from Gürkan Sengün <gurkan@linuks.mine.nu> to gurkan@phys.ethz.ch.
Request was from Gurkan Sengun <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:52:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:09:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Gürkan Sengün <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:09:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #22 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hello
Any news on this?
From the UPX-UCL webpage:
> 08 Sep 2010: UPX 3.07 has been released. It is a minor 3.0x maintenance release
> to version 3 whose major additions were:
> optional LZMA compression
Yours,
Gurkan
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:45:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:45:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #27 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
clone 452817 -1
reassign -1 lzma-dev 4.43-14
retitle -1 Doesn't provide all the files needed to compile UPX with lzma
block 452817 -1
Gürkan Sengün writes:
> Hello
>
> Any news on this?
>
>>From the UPX-UCL webpage:
>> 08 Sep 2010: UPX 3.07 has been released. It is a minor 3.0x maintenance release
>> to version 3 whose major additions were:
>> optional LZMA compression
No news. As I wrote previously, adding lzma support for upx would
require to have more lzma sources available than currently provided by
both lzma-dev and lzma-source packages.
I've just compiled upx with lzma and it seems that upx needs 45 lzma
sources from version 4.43 (the current Debian version) or only 9 files
from lzma 4.65. I'm attaching full lists of the files.
I've also tried lzma 9.20, the latest upstream version, but upx doesn't
support that version yet (i.e. failed to compile).
Regards,
robert
[lzma-4.43.files.gz (application/gzip, attachment)]
[lzma-4.65.files.gz (application/gzip, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Bug 452817 cloned as bug 614417.
Request was from Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:45:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Added blocking bug(s) of 452817: 614417
Request was from Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:48:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:36:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Mohammed Adnène Trojette <adn+deb@diwi.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>.
(Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:36:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #36 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011, Robert Luberda wrote:
> No news. As I wrote previously, adding lzma support for upx would
> require to have more lzma sources available than currently provided by
> both lzma-dev and lzma-source packages.
>
> I've just compiled upx with lzma and it seems that upx needs 45 lzma
> sources from version 4.43 (the current Debian version) or only 9 files
> from lzma 4.65. I'm attaching full lists of the files.
> I've also tried lzma 9.20, the latest upstream version, but upx doesn't
> support that version yet (i.e. failed to compile).
I am currently working on updating lzma to 9.22 (basically, apart from
cherry-picking and testing, I am ready to upload). This version of the
package drops lzma-source.
Please see if the package at [1] suits your needs.
[1] http://adn.diwi.org/debian/pkg/lzma/9.22-1/
--
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list.
(Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #41 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Mohammed Adnène Trojette writes:
Hi,
>
> I am currently working on updating lzma to 9.22 (basically, apart from
> cherry-picking and testing, I am ready to upload). This version of the
> package drops lzma-source.
>
> Please see if the package at [1] suits your needs.
>
Thanks a lot, upx compiles with the files from new lzma-dev and seems to
work fine.
However, I've got one suggestion. The LzmaEnc.c contains code like:
#ifndef _7ZIP_ST
#include "LzFindMt.h"
#endif
Even though I can add -D_7ZIP_ST to the compiler flags, I think the
better option would be to define _7ZIP_ST at the top of the file itself,
so anybody could compile the file without any surprises.
Alternatively you can provide a pre-compiled versions of *.c files in a
liblzma.a static library.
Thanks,
robert
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Sun, 28 Aug 2011 20:21:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Mohammed Adnène Trojette <adn+deb@diwi.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>.
(Sun, 28 Aug 2011 20:21:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #46 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011, Robert Luberda wrote:
> Thanks a lot, upx compiles with the files from new lzma-dev and seems to
> work fine.
>
> However, I've got one suggestion. The LzmaEnc.c contains code like:
> #ifndef _7ZIP_ST
> #include "LzFindMt.h"
> #endif
> Even though I can add -D_7ZIP_ST to the compiler flags, I think the
> better option would be to define _7ZIP_ST at the top of the file itself,
> so anybody could compile the file without any surprises.
> Alternatively you can provide a pre-compiled versions of *.c files in a
> liblzma.a static library.
Regarding liblzma, have you considered using xz' packages?
--
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:15:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list.
(Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:15:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #51 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Mohammed Adnène Trojette writes:
Hi,
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011, Robert Luberda wrote:
>> Alternatively you can provide a pre-compiled versions of *.c files in a
>> liblzma.a static library.
>
> Regarding liblzma, have you considered using xz' packages?
I was looking into it yesterday, but it seems the liblzma-dev API is not
compatible with the original lzma API.
Markus and Laszlo, do you have any plans of switching to xz-utils
(http://tukaani.org/xz/) in upx?
Regards,
robert
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:51:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to ml1050 <ezerotven@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>.
(Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:51:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #56 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hi,
2011/9/1 Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
> Mohammed Adnène Trojette writes:
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011, Robert Luberda wrote:
>>> Alternatively you can provide a pre-compiled versions of *.c files in a
>>> liblzma.a static library.
>>
>> Regarding liblzma, have you considered using xz' packages?
>
> I was looking into it yesterday, but it seems the liblzma-dev API is not
> compatible with the original lzma API.
>
> Markus and Laszlo, do you have any plans of switching to xz-utils
> (http://tukaani.org/xz/) in upx?
Well, unless there are real advantages (faster speed or better
compression ratio), I do not think we want to work on this now. But
patches are always welcome :-)
bye, Laszlo
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:48:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" <markus@oberhumer.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>.
(Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:48:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #61 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hi Robert,
On 2011-09-01 08:13, Robert Luberda wrote:
> Mohammed Adnène Trojette writes:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011, Robert Luberda wrote:
>>> Alternatively you can provide a pre-compiled versions of *.c files in a
>>> liblzma.a static library.
>>
>> Regarding liblzma, have you considered using xz' packages?
>
> I was looking into it yesterday, but it seems the liblzma-dev API is not
> compatible with the original lzma API.
>
> Markus and Laszlo, do you have any plans of switching to xz-utils
> (http://tukaani.org/xz/) in upx?
there are no plans to change our lzma usage in the near future. (Updating lzma
requires much testing and benchmarking, and actually newer lzma versions
sometimes even compress worse and/or slower without proper parameter finetuning.)
So for the moment I'd suggest to include lzma465.tar with the upx source
package, much like Fedora has done - please see upx-3.07-2.fc15.src.rpm at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=217744 .
Cheers,
Markus
> Regards,
> robert
--
Markus Oberhumer, <markus@oberhumer.com>, http://www.oberhumer.com/
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:30:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to John Reiser <jreiser@bitwagon.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>.
(Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:30:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #66 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On 09/01/2011 07:05 AM, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
> So for the moment I'd suggest to include lzma465.tar with the upx source
> package, much like Fedora has done - please see upx-3.07-2.fc15.src.rpm at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=217744 .
Specific comments that might help such integration are:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501636#c8 (how-to)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501636#c6 (rationale)
--
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Mohammed Adnène Trojette <adn+deb@diwi.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>.
(Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #71 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
> So for the moment I'd suggest to include lzma465.tar with the upx source
> package, much like Fedora has done - please see upx-3.07-2.fc15.src.rpm at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=217744 .
That's not a recommended practice to do this, quite the contrary.
Just tell me if something more is needed in the package I provided
earlier in the bug report.
FYI, I am planning to upload this evening in experimental.
--
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list.
(Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #76 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
>> So for the moment I'd suggest to include lzma465.tar with the upx source
>> package, much like Fedora has done - please see upx-3.07-2.fc15.src.rpm at
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=217744 .
>
> That's not a recommended practice to do this, quite the contrary.
I agree. For me it's just not a good idea to put two unrelated sources
into one source package. It's harder to maintain it that way.
> Just tell me if something more is needed in the package I provided
> earlier in the bug report.
Nothing more is required.
> FYI, I am planning to upload this evening in experimental.
I've just uploaded upx-ucl with lzma enabled into experimental as well.
Thanks,
robert
Reply sent
to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:54:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent
to gurkan@phys.ethz.ch:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:54:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #81 received at 452817-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Source: upx-ucl
Source-Version: 3.07-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
upx-ucl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
upx-ucl_3.07-4.debian.tar.gz
to main/u/upx-ucl/upx-ucl_3.07-4.debian.tar.gz
upx-ucl_3.07-4.dsc
to main/u/upx-ucl/upx-ucl_3.07-4.dsc
upx-ucl_3.07-4_i386.deb
to main/u/upx-ucl/upx-ucl_3.07-4_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 452817@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org> (supplier of updated upx-ucl package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:55:34 +0200
Source: upx-ucl
Binary: upx-ucl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.07-4
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>
Changed-By: Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>
Description:
upx-ucl - efficient live-compressor for executables
Closes: 452817
Changes:
upx-ucl (3.07-4) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Compile with the latest version of lzma-dev (closes: #452817):
+ add 02_lzma.patch for minor changes required to accomplish the above;
+ introduce build dependency on lzma-dev (>= 9.22).
* 03_typos.patch, debian/doc-base: Fix typos found by lintian.
* Remove leading article from package's description (lintian).
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no changes required).
Checksums-Sha1:
fbdd2cb783813d0f353d5e73caec1bc351f4b3f0 1035 upx-ucl_3.07-4.dsc
d12983820ccc96b21dab0d4a5e1c8e437c186c64 10484 upx-ucl_3.07-4.debian.tar.gz
09ff6c41d0e1e5f2d7ceca7b9257b37e0a52da3c 470608 upx-ucl_3.07-4_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
49cf51b3fd99757181fe6a36c8389bb522f20c6eeed1bd956ff6c93329efbd87 1035 upx-ucl_3.07-4.dsc
f8611ffc36c7f75e1aa7e53ec111c51b0902813c8247926da371ddc88ec86d95 10484 upx-ucl_3.07-4.debian.tar.gz
3d4635ad06bfa97d7fa3a5e53dd6584899f33680bc3464bb814d8738543e9fcc 470608 upx-ucl_3.07-4_i386.deb
Files:
6321a5f0f506b8d625c0497b1fff1759 1035 utils optional upx-ucl_3.07-4.dsc
503f646d77f3a12a8e9a2ed1b506feab 10484 utils optional upx-ucl_3.07-4.debian.tar.gz
a42922b3429c0a9d4c33be5f83a7d7e1 470608 utils optional upx-ucl_3.07-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk5u8ykACgkQThh1cJ0wnDts1wCeLVEobkYDQQsqAo8Mjvf15ihi
C1oAnRmJjpyBqRIUsuk2zFF8tyiGqky4
=Uafr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org:
Bug#452817; Package upx-ucl.
(Sat, 07 Jan 2012 13:45:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Robert Luberda <robert@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list.
(Sat, 07 Jan 2012 13:45:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #86 received at 452817@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
Hi,
>
> FYI, I am planning to upload this evening in experimental.
>
When do you plan to upload it to unstable?
upx-ucl has been in experimental for 3 months already, so I thought it
could be good idea to upload it to unstable, but I've noticed that lzma
9.22 is still in experimental only.
Regards,
robert
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org.
(Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:34:42 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Sun Aug 27 11:41:34 2023;
Machine Name:
buxtehude
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.