Debian Bug report logs - #449356
RM: elfsh -- RoQA; multiple long standing RC bugs, unmaintained

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?

Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:22:33 +0100

Package: elfsh
Version: 0.65rc1-1.1
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-orphan

Hi,

While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:

 * 4 RC bugs with no recent activity

If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being
orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so.

If you agree that it should be orphaned, sending the following commands
to control@bugs.debian.org should do it (after replacing nnnnnn with
this bug's number):

severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn wnpp
retitle nnnnnn O: <packagename> -- <short package description>
thanks

For more information, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/

If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues.

Thank you,

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Message #10 received at 449356@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andrés Roldán <andres.roldan@fluidsignal.com>

To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>, 449356@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?

Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:26:38 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Please don't orphan this package as I am now packaging Eresi which will
replace elfsh.

Thanks.

On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 12:22 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: elfsh
> Version: 0.65rc1-1.1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: proposed-orphan
> 
> Hi,
> 
> While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
> should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
> 
>  * 4 RC bugs with no recent activity
> 
> If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being
> orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so.
> 
> If you agree that it should be orphaned, sending the following commands
> to control@bugs.debian.org should do it (after replacing nnnnnn with
> this bug's number):
> 
> severity nnnnnn normal
> reassign nnnnnn wnpp
> retitle nnnnnn O: <packagename> -- <short package description>
> thanks
> 
> For more information, see
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
> 
> If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
> close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
-- 
Andrés Roldán
Ingeniero de Proyectos - Debian Developer - C|EH
Fluidsignal Group S.A.
Where security meets business
http://www.fuidsignal.com/
ISO 9001:2000
ISO/IEC 27001:2005
Teléfono: +57 (4) 3522627 ext. 205
Móvil: +57 313-6463678
PGP Key-ID: 0xB29396EB

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 449356@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>

To: Andrés Roldán <andres.roldan@fluidsignal.com>, 449356@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 434826@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?

Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:31:38 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 12/12/07 at 15:26 -0500, Andrés Roldán wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
> > should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
> > 
> >  * 4 RC bugs with no recent activity
> Please don't orphan this package as I am now packaging Eresi which will
> replace elfsh.

Hi Andrés,

Have you made some progress on this ITP? I'm a bit concerned about the
fact that elfsh is completely broken, while the work on packaging eresi
seems to have been ongoing for several months. Do you have an idea of
when the eresi package will be available? Will it be in time for lenny?

Thank you,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 449356@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>

To: Andrés Roldán <andres.roldan@fluidsignal.com>

Cc: 449356@bugs.debian.org, 434826@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?

Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 18:34:08 -0600

Hello Andrés,

On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Andrés Roldán wrote:
> Please don't orphan this package as I am now packaging Eresi which will
> replace elfsh.

I was wondering, why elfsh should not be orphaned (or even removed) before 
eresi is packaged?

If you really don't want any action to be performed on elfsh, could you then 
please provide some information about your erasi ITP?

>
> Thanks.
>


Kind regards,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Message #23 received at 449356@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>

To: 449356@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?

Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 16:41:38 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

retitle 449356 elfsh: should this package be removed?
severtity 449356 serious
thanks

On Wednesday 02 April 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hello Andrés,
>
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Andrés Roldán wrote:
> > Please don't orphan this package as I am now packaging Eresi which will
> > replace elfsh.
>
> I was wondering, why elfsh should not be orphaned (or even removed) before
> eresi is packaged?

ping ^^^

Will request the package's removal in a month if no progress is made.


>
> If you really don't want any action to be performed on elfsh, could you
> then please provide some information about your erasi ITP?
>
> > Thanks.
>
> Kind regards,


Cheers,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #30 received at 449356@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>

To: 449356@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: elfsh: requesting package's removal

Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 19:43:36 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

severity 449356 normal
retitle 449356 RM: elfsh -- RoQA; multiple long standing RC bugs, unmaintained
forcemerge 449356 470682
reassign 449356 ftp.debian.org
thanks

It's been a while a nothing, visible, has changed. So I'm finally requesting 
this package's removal.

Regards,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #41 received at 449356@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Andrés Roldán" <andres.roldan@gmail.com>

To: "Raphael Geissert" <atomo64@gmail.com>, 449356@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#449356: elfsh: requesting package's removal

Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 08:44:49 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

FYI, a new package of elfsh is pending of approval on new queue:

http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/eresi_1:0.8a25-2.html

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com> wrote:

> severity 449356 normal
> retitle 449356 RM: elfsh -- RoQA; multiple long standing RC bugs,
> unmaintained
> forcemerge 449356 470682
> reassign 449356 ftp.debian.org
> thanks
>
> It's been a while a nothing, visible, has changed. So I'm finally
> requesting
> this package's removal.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Atomo64 - Raphael
>
> Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
> See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #46 received at 449356-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Debian Archive Maintenance <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>

To: 449356-close@bugs.debian.org

Cc: elfsh@packages.debian.org, elfsh@packages.qa.debian.org

Subject: Bug#449356: fixed

Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:48:20 +0000

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

     elfsh | 0.51b3-2.1 | alpha, amd64, hppa, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
     elfsh | 0.65rc1-1.1 | source, i386
 libelfsh0 | 0.51b3-2.1 | alpha, amd64, hppa, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
 libelfsh0 | 0.65rc1-1.1 | i386
libelfsh0-dev | 0.51b3-2.1 | alpha, amd64, hppa, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libelfsh0-dev | 0.65rc1-1.1 | i386

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 449356@bugs.debian.org.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thomas Viehmann (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.