Debian Bug report logs -
#425426
allow creation of user accounts with duplicate uid
Reported by: Nico Golde <nion@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:54:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: wontfix
Found in version adduser/3.102
Done: Nico Golde <nion@debian.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#425426; Package adduser.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Nico Golde <nion@debian.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Package: adduser
Version: 3.102
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
a command line switch like -o in useradd would be nice.
Kind regards
Nico
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages adduser depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.13 Debian configuration management sy
ii passwd 1:4.0.18.1-8 change and administer password and
ii perl-base 5.8.8-7 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
adduser recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
adduser/homedir-permission: true
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#425426; Package adduser.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #10 received at 425426@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
> Hi,
> a command line switch like -o in useradd would be nice.
Why do you want this? It might be possible to do, but it means a fair
amount of bending over backwards to force tools to do the wrong thing,
and I'm really not inclined to do that unless there is a compelling
reason.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| ,''`. Stephen Gran |
| : :' : sgran@debian.org |
| `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer |
| `- http://www.debian.org |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#425426; Package adduser.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Nico Golde <nion@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #15 received at 425426@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
* Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org> [2007-05-21 19:24]:
> This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
> > Hi,
> > a command line switch like -o in useradd would be nice.
>
> Why do you want this? It might be possible to do, but it means a fair
> amount of bending over backwards to force tools to do the wrong thing,
> and I'm really not inclined to do that unless there is a compelling
> reason.
Why not? If you want to have a second root user without
password, homedirectory and login shell you need it. And I
mean technically there is no problem with that. In some
cases you can't use root for a specific task and you don't
want to use suid 0 binaries cause they might be exploited by
other users. And I mean useradd enables this, why not then?
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#425426; Package adduser.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Joerg Hoh <joerg@joerghoh.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #20 received at 425426@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:32:25PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> Why not? If you want to have a second root user without
> password, homedirectory and login shell you need it.
Why not use sudo?
> And I
> mean technically there is no problem with that. In some
> cases you can't use root for a specific task and you don't
> want to use suid 0 binaries cause they might be exploited by
> other users. And I mean useradd enables this, why not then?
Then you just need useradd.
Joerg
--
What did you do to the cat? It looks half-dead. -Schroedinger's wife
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#425426; Package adduser.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Nico Golde <nion@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #25 received at 425426@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
* Joerg Hoh <joerg@joerghoh.de> [2007-05-22 01:23]:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:32:25PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> >
> > Why not? If you want to have a second root user without
> > password, homedirectory and login shell you need it.
>
> Why not use sudo?
Cause I don't need it.
> > And I
> > mean technically there is no problem with that. In some
> > cases you can't use root for a specific task and you don't
> > want to use suid 0 binaries cause they might be exploited by
> > other users. And I mean useradd enables this, why not then?
>
> Then you just need useradd.
Then I can't use the features of adduser ;)
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#425426; Package adduser.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #30 received at 425426@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
> Hi,
> * Joerg Hoh <joerg@joerghoh.de> [2007-05-22 01:23]:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:32:25PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > >
> > > Why not? If you want to have a second root user without
> > > password, homedirectory and login shell you need it.
> >
> > Why not use sudo?
>
> Cause I don't need it.
>
> > > And I
> > > mean technically there is no problem with that. In some
> > > cases you can't use root for a specific task and you don't
> > > want to use suid 0 binaries cause they might be exploited by
> > > other users. And I mean useradd enables this, why not then?
> >
> > Then you just need useradd.
>
> Then I can't use the features of adduser ;)
adduser exists for two reasons: first, to provide a policy layer over
the normal tools like useradd, and second, to make it easier than those
tools oridnarily do to manage users. Your request feels like it breaks
the first part, which is why we're not keen on doing it.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| ,''`. Stephen Gran |
| : :' : sgran@debian.org |
| `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer |
| `- http://www.debian.org |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#425426; Package adduser.
(Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:03:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Marc Haber <mh+debian-packages@zugschlus.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>.
(Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:03:43 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #35 received at 425426@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
retitle #425426 allow creation of user accounts with duplicate uid
thanks
Changed Bug title to 'allow creation of user accounts with duplicate uid' from 'allow creation of user accounts with dublicate uid'
Request was from Marc Haber <mh+debian-packages@zugschlus.de>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:03:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#425426; Package adduser.
(Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:06:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Marc Haber <mh+debian-packages@zugschlus.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Adduser Developers <adduser-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>.
(Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:06:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #42 received at 425426@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
tags #425426 wontfix
thanks
Tagging this bug wontfix
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Request was from Marc Haber <mh+debian-packages@zugschlus.de>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:06:57 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message sent on
to Nico Golde <nion@debian.org>:
Bug#425426.
(Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:07:39 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Reply sent
to Nico Golde <nion@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:21:55 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent
to Nico Golde <nion@debian.org>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:21:57 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #52 received at 425426-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Let's actually close this, there are better ways to do that.
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org.
(Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:35:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Sat Jul 1 21:05:53 2023;
Machine Name:
bembo
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.