Debian Bug report logs - #423199
jetty: should this package be orphaned?

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: jetty: should this package be orphaned?

Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:36:59 +0200

Package: jetty
Version: 5.1.10-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-orphan

Hi,

While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package
came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer,
because:
 * RC bug opened for ~200 days with no answer from the maintainer
 * new upstream release available

If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being
orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so.

If you agree that it should be orphaned, sending the following commands
to control@bugs.debian.org should do it (after replacing nnnnnn with
this bug's number):

severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn wnpp
retitle nnnnnn O: jetty -- Java servlet engine and webserver
thanks

For more information, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/

If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues.

Thank you,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Message #10 received at 423199@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>

To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>, 423199@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#423199: jetty: should this package be orphaned?

Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:55:39 +0200

owner 423199 !
thanks

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:36:59PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: jetty
> Version: 5.1.10-2
> Severity: serious
> User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: proposed-orphan
> 
> Hi,
> 
> While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package
> came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer,
> because:
>  * RC bug opened for ~200 days with no answer from the maintainer
>  * new upstream release available
> 
> If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being
> orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so.
> 
> If you agree that it should be orphaned, sending the following commands
> to control@bugs.debian.org should do it (after replacing nnnnnn with
> this bug's number):
> 
> severity nnnnnn normal
> reassign nnnnnn wnpp
> retitle nnnnnn O: jetty -- Java servlet engine and webserver
> thanks
> 
> For more information, see
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
> 
> If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
> close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues.

Eclipse 3.3 will depend on (a newer version of) jetty. I will update
this package.


Cheers,
Michael
-- 
 .''`.  | Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>
: :' :  | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `'   |
  `-    | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B

Message #17 received at 423199@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>

To: 423199-done@bugs.debian.org, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>, 423199@bugs.debian.org

Subject: jetty has a new (additional) maintainer

Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:31:48 +0200

Version: 5.1.10-3


I am taking over jetty as I need it as a dependency.


Cheers,
Michael

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.