Debian Bug report logs - #419523
RFH: libreoffice -- office productivity suite

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: RFH: openoffice.org -- OpenOffice.org Office suite

Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:19:09 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I request assistance with maintaining the openoffice.org package.

The package description is:
 OpenOffice.org is a full-featured office productivity suite that provides
 a near drop-in replacement for Microsoft(R) Office.
 .
 This metapackage installs all components of openoffice.org:
  * openoffice.org-writer: Word processor
  * openoffice.org-calc: Spreadsheet
  * openoffice.org-impress: Presentation
  * openoffice.org-draw: Drawing
  * openoffice.org-base: Database
  * openoffice.org-math: Equation editor
  * openoffice.org-filter-mobiledevb: Mobile Devices filters
  * openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: legacy filters (e.g. StarOffice 5.2)
 .
 You can extend the functionality of OpenOffice.org by installing these
 packages:
  * hunspell-dictionary-*/myspell-dictionary-*: Hunspell/Myspell dictionaries
    for use with OpenOffice.org
  * openoffice.org-l10n-*: UI interface translation
  * openoffice.org-help-*: User help
  * openoffice.org-thesaurus-*: Thesauri for the use with OpenOffice.org
  * openoffice.org-hyphenation-*: Hyphenation patterns for OpenOffice.org
  * openoffice.org-gtk: Gtk UI Plugin, GNOME File Picker support,
    QuickStarter for GNOMEs notification are
  * openoffice.org-gnome: GNOME VFS, GConf backend
  * openoffice.org-kde: KDE UI Plugin and KDE File Picker support
  * menu: Will add openoffice.org menu entries for every Debian window manager.
  * unixodbc: ODBC database support
  * cupsys-bsd: Allows OpenOffice.org to detect your CUPS printer queues
     automatically
  * libsane: Use your sane-supported scanner with OpenOffice.org
  * libxrender1: Speed up display by using Xrender library
  * libgl1: OpenGL support
  * openclipart-openoffice.org: Open Clip Art Gallery with OOo index files
  * iceweasel | firefox | icedove | thunderbird | iceape-browser | mozilla-browser:
    Mozilla profile with Certificates needed for XML Security...
  * openoffice.org-filter-binfilter: Legacy filters (e.g. StarOffice 5.2)
  * msttcorefonts: Installs standard MS truetype fonts (contrib)
  * java-gcj-compat/gij-4.1 | j2re1.4 (non-free) | java2-runtime
    Java Runtime Environment for use with OpenOffice.org
  * pstoedit / imagemagick: helper tools for EPS thumbnails
  * gstreamer0.10-plugins-*: GStreamer plugins for use with OOos media backend

The team mentioned in thze Maintainer field currently consists of me
(with the rare exception of some people sending patches)

I don't relly have the time to maintain this big package alone, although
I have done so far since 2.0.0 basically... That shows itself in the
number of open bugs (many of them are probably just obsolete and many of
those not obsolete are upstream bugs and need forwarding...).

If you don't want tp help maintaining this package you also could help
in various other ways (like handling the BTS, cleaning up etc). But
someone who helps with (maintaining it is also welcome.

I'll be available to answer any questions; you will have some I think :)

Regards,

Rene

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #10 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Giuseppe Sacco" <giuseppe@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org>

To: "Rene Engelhard" <rene@debian.org>, 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#419523: RFH: openoffice.org -- OpenOffice.org Office suite

Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:49:29 +0200 (CEST)

Hi Rene,

I would like to help in maintaining such a package, but since I cannot
estimate how much spare time I'll have, I would like to start browsing all
bug reports and checking them for reproducibility against the latest
version.

Is this ok for you? Is there any coordination list for working on openoffice?

Bye,
Giuseppe

Message #15 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>

To: Giuseppe Sacco <giuseppe@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org>, 419523@bugs.debian.org

Cc: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#419523: RFH: openoffice.org -- OpenOffice.org Office suite

Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:00:11 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> I would like to help in maintaining such a package, but since I cannot
> estimate how much spare time I'll have, I would like to start browsing all
> bug reports and checking them for reproducibility against the latest
> version.
> 
> Is this ok for you? Is there any coordination list for working on openoffice?

Yes.

Luca Bedgoni already started to work on this, though, maybe you want to
coordinate with him. What he found out so far:

        I looked, as i've promised, at the BTS, and found the following issues. Prior
to submit information or closing bugs on the BTS, I ask to you, because it's
the first time we collaborate. Feel free to report comments :)
        282546: resolved, hence to close
        286592: ask if the problem is still persistant
        293578: ask if the problem is still persistant
        296335: ask if the problem is still persistant
        297228: moreinfo, ask if the problem is still persistant
        306747: moreinfo, ask if the problem is still persistant
        308600: ask if the problem is still persistant
        312549: ask if the problem is still persistant
        324535: it seems that the problem is not related with openoffice, but with
nfs. Closing? And retitle maybe :)
        329235: moreinfo, solution provided but no answer received
        330232: moreinfo, ask if the problem is still persistant
        331065: ask if the problem is still persistant
        341123: moreinfo, ask if the problem is still persistant
        347454: works here, unreproducible
        348827: ask if the problem is still persistant, i'm not experiencing this bug
        350173: confirmed, experiencing identic problem
        351099: unconfirmed, works here
        353350: unconfirmed, works here
        354323: link not working, provide a working one
        380748: works here (KDE)
        386250: unconfirmed, if a sheet is blank it won't print it
        392299: this seems NFS related
        411259: Close?
        415270: works here, unreproducible
        418146: works here, unreproducible

Coordination is the Maintainer: adress,
debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org. (although above happened in private mail, Cc'ing -openoffice now).
There's also the currently more-or-less idle #debian-oo :)

Gr??e/Regards,

Ren?
-- 
 .''`.  Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Laszlo Boszormenyi <gcs@lsc.hu>

To: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>, 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#419523: RFH: openoffice.org -- OpenOffice.org Office suite

Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:54:48 +0200

Hi Rene!

On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:19 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I request assistance with maintaining the openoffice.org package.
 Well, always wanted to be part of the OpenOffice.org team; but I know
that I wouldn't be a big help as I'm short on time. :-(

> I'll be available to answer any questions; you will have some I think :)
 Just two, related to one of my package. What about build with neon26?
Tried yesterday, but I was out of disk space; thought six gigs would be
enough - it isn't. How big is the build directory after successful
compilation?

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS

Message #25 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>

To: Laszlo Boszormenyi <gcs@lsc.hu>

Cc: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#419523: RFH: openoffice.org -- OpenOffice.org Office suite

Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:49:48 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:19 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > I request assistance with maintaining the openoffice.org package.
>  Well, always wanted to be part of the OpenOffice.org team; but I know

welcome :). If you wish, I can add you to the alioth project.

> that I wouldn't be a big help as I'm short on time. :-(

Well, even the occassional things would be good. (if you find something
to fix, know a solution to a bug report, do some cleanup, want to fix something,
whatever :)). 

> > I'll be available to answer any questions; you will have some I think :)
>  Just two, related to one of my package. What about build with neon26?
> Tried yesterday, but I was out of disk space; thought six gigs would be
> enough - it isn't. How big is the build directory after successful

should be. (Around 6G, the i386 buildd needed 5904536k for the last build it did
(2.0.4.dfsg.2-6). One trick is to just build english (export
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="lang=en-US". That also reduces build time (and is
used on the buildds).

The problem with neon 26 was that it builds but doesn't work; OOo
crashes with a webdav exception; see the bugs I closed with reverting
to 25. I didn't have much time to look into that after I noticed that,
I still hoped to get this in for etch r0 so I did the quick way. (and -7
is approved for etch r1).

Regards,

Rene
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #30 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sami Kallio <sami.kallio@ppb.inet.fi>

To: rene@debian.org

Cc: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#419523: RFH: openoffice.org -- OpenOffice.org Office suite

Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:07:40 +0300

Hi Rene,

I wish to offer my humble services to help maintain openoffice package. 
I have never worked on Debian package before, but I have some coding 
experience, so I wish helping to maintain a package which I use daily 
would teach me inner workings of Debian packaging.

Dunno yet where to start, but I'm a fast learner :)

BR,
Sami

Message #35 received at 419523-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Lior Kaplan <kaplan@debian.org>

To: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org

Cc: 419523-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Work done on OO.org bugs

Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:28:23 +0300

Hi,

After having lunch with Chris Halls at Debconf7, and hearing that help 
is needed with OO.org bugs [1], I decided to give a little help.

1. 26 bugs got version info added (hence all these found messages to the 
list).
2. Two bugs were closed (well, nothing special, just obvious bugs I 
noticed).
3. All bugs which are reported to a version prior to 2.0.0-1 were user 
tagged [2]. We have 169 bugs there, the most recent one is 1 year and 70 
days old.

I intend to send closing warnings to all of them. And later closing them 
unless users (or someone else) will report the bug is still relevant in 
an more recent OO.org version (hopefully 2.2.1, but 2.0.4 will also be 
fine).

Timeline:
First warning - July 1st
Second warning - July 15th
Third (and final) warning - July 31st
Actual closing - August 15th.

This give users 6 weeks to answer the warnings, which should be 
reasonable enough for people without permanent internet connection, 
people on vacation etc.

Please let me know if you have comments about the process.

In the future, I intend to do the same for version which are smaller 
than the sarge version (2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1). After that, I want to 
start doing some periodic checks for all remaining bugs, verifying they 
exist in our latest SID version. But let's not jump too much a head (;

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/419523
[2] 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org;tag=oo.org-pre-2.0-bug

-- 

Lior Kaplan
kaplan@debian.org

GPG fingerprint:
C644 D0B3 92F4 8FE4 4662  B541 1558 9445 99E8 1DA0

Message #40 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>

To: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>

Cc: Debian BTS control <control@bugs.debian.org>, 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#419523: RFH: openoffice.org -- OpenOffice.org Office suite

Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:47:28 +1100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

package openoffice.org
block 419523 by 519514
thanks

On 24-Apr-2007, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Well, even the occassional things would be good. (if you find
> something to fix, know a solution to a bug report, do some cleanup,
> want to fix something, whatever :)). 

I think the barriers to assisting will be significantly lessened by
fixing Bug#519514, “Vcs-* control fields incorrect”.

-- 
 \        “We should be less concerned about adding years to life, and |
  `\         more about adding life to years.” —Arthur C. Clarke, 2001 |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #45 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>

To: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>, 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#419523: RFH: openoffice.org -- OpenOffice.org Office suite

Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:18:32 +0100

unblock 419523 by 519514
thanks

Hi,

Ben Finney wrote:
> On 24-Apr-2007, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Well, even the occassional things would be good. (if you find
> > something to fix, know a solution to a bug report, do some cleanup,
> > want to fix something, whatever :)). 
> 
> I think the barriers to assisting will be significantly lessened by
> fixing Bug#519514, “Vcs-* control fields incorrect”.

They *are* correct. You need debian/ *and* ooo-build. There will be even
more barriers when you just point to debian/. That will just do nothing
you can use to build a package. (Yes, there's a get-ooo-build target, though,
but you get a problem when you already have the sources there in
ooo-build/src).

Hacking on the package can also be done on the source package you
get using apt-get source.

But yes, I agree it'd be easier if we didn't have the extra ooo-build there
(or if we switched to "3.0 (quilt)" with an extra ooo-build tarball.

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

Message #50 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>

To: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: now LibreOffice

Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:59:31 +0100

retitle 419523 RFH: libreoffice - office productivity suite
thanks

Hi,

this "of course" now also holds true for LibreOffice. (And squeeze -
the last release which will include OOo is in deep freeze anyway)
See also the advocacy on 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/11/msg00180.html

Grüße/Regards,

René

Message #59 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Wolf Halton <wolf.halton@gmail.com>

To: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Open-Office Packaging

Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:24:37 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I am a member of the Apache OpenOffice project and I would like to help
with the packaging of OpenOffice/LibreOffice.

I would like to keep the open-office name for ApacheOpenOffice, which owns
the name and have the LibreOffice packages have their own name. I do not
care about the status quo particularly, because I think it is wrong and
infringing.

I started a group on Ubuntu to package ApacheOpenOffice, but since it was
just me, and I have never packaged anything before, there is not much work
getting done there.  It makes more sense to package ApacheOpenOffice and
LibreOffice here in the upstream, than to try to fix derivative distros.

Tell me what I can do to help.

Cheers!

Wolf

-- 
Wolf Halton
This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com
Open-Source Software in Libraries - http://FOSS4Lib.org
Advancing Libraries Together - http://LYRASIS.org
Apache Open Office Developer wolfhalton@apache.org

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #64 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Henry Castro <hcvcastro@gmail.com>

To: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RE: RFH: libreoffice -- office productivity suite

Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:12:32 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,



 Tell me what I can do to help.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #69 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Henry Castro <hcvcastro@gmail.com>

To: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RE: RFH: libreoffice -- office productivity suite

Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:15:21 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

I like the libreoffice product.

Please let me know what I can do to help.


Regards
Henry

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #74 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andrea Cani <andreacani85to@gmail.com>

To: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RFH: openoffice.org -- OpenOffice.org Office suite

Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:56:20 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi
I'm a software engineer and would know if you need to help for fix bug or
improve openoffice

Best Regard
Cani Andrea

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #79 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Riley Baird <BM-2cVqnDuYbAU5do2DfJTrN7ZbAJ246S4Xix@bitmessage.ch>

To: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Can this bug be closed?

Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 12:02:08 +1100

This bug doesn't seem to be getting much activity, except for many
people saying that they are able to help, but with no specifics. It also
seems that there would be the debian-openoffice mailing list for this
purpose.

Given this, I propose that this bug be closed.

Message #84 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ken Siu <mlist@disroot.org>

To: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#419523: RFH: openoffice.org -- OpenOffice.org Office suite

Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:05:15 +1100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

I am interested in helping out with Libreoffice.

I don't have too much coding experience so I am hoping to contribute in 
documentation. Would you bee able to let me know where can I get started 
on this?

Ken

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #89 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: lakePaul <mlist@disroot.org>

To: 419523@bugs.debian.org, debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org

Subject: unsubscribe

Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 19:46:07 +1100

Message #94 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: eamanu15 <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com>

To: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RFH: libreoffice -- office productivity suite

Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:15:34 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

If help is no longer needed, please close this thread

Regards!
eamanu
-- 
Arias Emmanuel
https://www.linkedin.com/in/emmanuel-arias-437a6a8a
http://eamanu.com

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #99 received at 419523@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Laurin Hagemann <laurinhg@gmx.de>

To: 419523@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFH: libreoffice -- office productivity suite

Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 21:28:40 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:15:34 +0000 eamanu15 <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com> wrote:
> If help is no longer needed, please close this thread

Is help still needed/appreciated?

-- 
/Laurin

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
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=lXQM
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #104 received at 419523-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>

To: 419523-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFH: libreoffice -- office productivity suite

Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 22:34:28 +0200

On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:15:34 +0000 eamanu15 <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> If help is no longer needed, please close this thread

Neither help offers nor repeated suggestions to close the issue were 
answered, so I am doing this now. If the libreoffice team still needs 
help, they can repost a RFH.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.