Debian Bug report logs - #413986
ITP: xmlrpc-epi -- XML-RPC request serialisation/deserialisation library

version graph

Package: wnpp; Maintainer for wnpp is wnpp@debian.org;

Reported by: Paul TBBle Hampson <Paul.Hampson@Pobox.com>

Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:09:05 UTC

Owned by: "paul "tbble" hampson" <paul.hampson@pobox.com>

Severity: wishlist

Fixed in version xmlrpc-epi/0.54-3

Done: Robin Cornelius <robin.cornelius@gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #25 received at 413986@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

Received: (at 413986) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2007 03:46:36 +0000
From Paul.Hampson@Pobox.com Mon Mar 19 03:46:36 2007
Return-path: <Paul.Hampson@Pobox.com>
Received: from betty.cbit.net.au ([202.55.154.10] helo=mail.cbit.net.au)
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HT8pP-0005en-VQ
	for 413986@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:46:36 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.cbit.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B3B1081B8
	for <413986@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:46:35 +1100 (EST)
Received: from mail.cbit.net.au ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (betty [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
	id 01176-01-8 for <413986@bugs.debian.org>;
	Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:46:34 +1100 (EST)
Received: from keitarou.bubblesworth.net (unknown [202.55.155.91])
	by mail.cbit.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D151081B5
	for <413986@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:46:34 +1100 (EST)
Received: by keitarou.bubblesworth.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 40407380B0; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:46:29 +1100 (EST)
Resent-From: Paul TBBle Hampson <Paul.Hampson@Pobox.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:46:29 +1100
Resent-Message-ID: <20070319034629.GD9123@keitarou>
Resent-To: 413986@bugs.debian.org
X-Original-To: tbble@keitarou.bubblesworth.net
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by keitarou.bubblesworth.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE473809F
	for <tbble@keitarou.bubblesworth.net>; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:58:45 +1100 (EST)
X-Original-To: tbble@cbit.net.au
Received: from mail.cbit.net.au [202.55.154.7]
	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.6 polling mail.cbit.net.au account tbble@cbit.net.au)
	for <tbble@keitarou.bubblesworth.net> (single-drop); Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:58:45 +1100 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.cbit.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6AD1083CF
	for <tbble@cbit.net.au>; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:56:55 +1100 (EST)
Received: from mail.cbit.net.au ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (betty [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
	id 02066-01-47 for <tbble@cbit.net.au>;
	Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:56:54 +1100 (EST)
Received: from mailler.cbit.net.au (mailler.cbit.net.au [202.55.154.13])
	by mail.cbit.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C92C1083CA
	for <tbble@cbit.net.au>; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:56:54 +1100 (EST)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1173617812-1cab00220000-FAWnAq
X-Barracuda-URL: http://202.55.154.13:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-Connect: lime.pobox.com[208.58.1.198]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1173617812
Received: from lime.pobox.com (lime.pobox.com [208.58.1.198])
	by mailler.cbit.net.au (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2E18D2020B6F
	for <tbble@cbit.net.au>; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:56:53 +1100 (EST)
Received: from lime.pobox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by lime.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25874FA425
	for <tbble@cbit.net.au>; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 08:57:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cobija.connexer.com (cobija.connexer.com [66.93.22.232]) by
 lime.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA064F9ED9 for
 <Paul.Hampson@Pobox.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 08:57:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.128] (h-234-204.A189.cust.bahnhof.se
 [81.170.234.204]) by cobija.connexer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EC017C419;
 Sun, 11 Mar 2007 08:56:48 -0400 (EDT)
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [php-maint] xmlrpc-epi turns out to be libxmlrpc in php
Subject: Re: [php-maint] xmlrpc-epi turns out to be libxmlrpc in php
From: sean finney <seanius@debian.org>
To: Paul TBBle Hampson <Paul.Hampson@Pobox.com>
Cc: 413968@bugs.debian.org,
	Debian PHP Maintainers <pkg-php-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070311064425.GA25433@keitarou>
References: <20070310160558.GA21065@keitarou>
 <1173547149.5483.15.camel@localhost>  <20070311064425.GA25433@keitarou>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vbqSrTw5a252j/8wOcxt"
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:56:42 +0100
Message-Id: <1173617802.17084.34.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 
X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at cbit.net.au
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.10937
	Rule breakdown below
	 pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at cbit.net.au
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at cbit.net.au
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROMDEVELOPER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 17:44 +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> I'm suggesting either. I'm happy to maintain the package seperately, but
> I intend to go through the differences between the versions and confirm
> that they are compatible, and steal anything good from the php-bundled
> version, so in effect I'd be doing both. I'd also have to track upstream
> PHP in case they add anything else to the library in the future. So
> maybe a PHP package team member might want to be a co-maintainer...

okay, perhaps we can revisit this after you're done.  if you decide to
use the upstream version we can see how hard it is to build php against
that instead of the bundled code.  if you decide you want to use the
php-bundled version, then we should probably just generate it from the
php5 source package directly.  i don't use this extension myself, so in
any event it would be wise to find someone who does so we can test that
it still works :)

> A quick poke around the Internet suggested that the only patches being
> made by other distros to xmlrpc-epi are for gcc4, 64-bit and expat, but
> I haven't looked at the PHP-bundled version's changes yet, apart from
> verifying that the .h files match semanticly.

did you check that visually, or did you use a utility like icheck?

> Hmm, I'd better check this now, all the files in the libxmlrpc directory
> carry the same copyright headers as the upstream xmlrpc-epi distribution
> (BSD-like), does the PHP license override them and prevent debundling?
> I'd like to keep the distinct package under its upstream license if
> possible, as it's very very permissive, and the seconde-life client is
> GPLd.

if the files carry a copyright header i think that they override
whatever the default PHP license might say, so i don't think it'd be a
problem.


	sean
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Fri Apr 18 03:59:27 2014; Machine Name: beach.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.