Debian Bug report logs - #406992
ITP: virtualbox -- x86 virtualization solution

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:12:59 +0100

Package: wnpp

* Package name    : virtualbox
  Upstream Author : InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH
* URL or Web page : http://www.virtualbox.org/
* License         : GPL2
  Description     : x86 virtualization solution

VirtualBox is a powerful PC virtualization solution allowing you to run
a wide range of PC operating systems on your Linux system. This includes
Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, DOS, OpenBSD and others. VirtualBox comes with
a broad feature set and excellent performance, making it the premier
virtualization software solution on the market.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #10 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>

To: control@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 406992@bugs.debian.org

Subject: close second itp for virtualbox

Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:34:02 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

merge 407001 406992

thanks

I've opened an second itp for virtualbox after Daniel opened his one,
but before it was shown in the bug database.

:S

Greetings
Patrick

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #21 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>

To: 406992@bugs.debian.org

Subject: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:08:01 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

we would like to provide the Debian package for the OSE version ourself. Any
help is appreciated. I will start providing the current build scripts for
the package we used for the existing packages (will take a day or so).

We also would like to get the non-OSE version included into non-free with
a hint that this version has some more features than the OSE version.

Kind regards,

Frank
-- 
## InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH, http://www.innotek.de ##

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #26 received at 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>, 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org, Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:33:07 +0100

Frank Mehnert wrote:
> we would like to provide the Debian package for the OSE version ourself.

Hi,

my package is nearly done, only the module source package is to not yet
finished. However, you're of course welcome to co-maintain it with me
and Patrick.

> I will start providing the current build scripts for
> the package we used for the existing packages (will take a day or so).

good. Please tell me where I can grap the diff.gz as soon as you've
uploaded it somewhere.

> We also would like to get the non-OSE version included into non-free with
> a hint that this version has some more features than the OSE version.

Does the features of the proprietary version require a rebuild of the
underlying virtualbox, or, can they be independently packages as
add-ons? If not, this means that there would be two complete virtualbox
packages in Debian, I'm not so sure if we really want that.

Unrelated to that, there are some issues with the build, such as
requiring linux-headers as build-dependency of virtualbox frontend, not
the module-source. Where is the proper list to discuss this?

Regards,
Daniel

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #31 received at 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>

To: daniel@debian.org

Cc: 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org, Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, Achim Hasenmueller <achimha@innotek.de>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:59:18 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Daniel,

On Tuesday 16 January 2007 20:33, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Frank Mehnert wrote:
> > we would like to provide the Debian package for the OSE version ourself.
>
> Hi,
>
> my package is nearly done, only the module source package is to not yet
> finished. However, you're of course welcome to co-maintain it with me
> and Patrick.

Good.

> > I will start providing the current build scripts for
> > the package we used for the existing packages (will take a day or so).
>
> good. Please tell me where I can grap the diff.gz as soon as you've
> uploaded it somewhere.
>
> > We also would like to get the non-OSE version included into non-free with
> > a hint that this version has some more features than the OSE version.
>
> Does the features of the proprietary version require a rebuild of the
> underlying virtualbox, or, can they be independently packages as
> add-ons? If not, this means that there would be two complete virtualbox
> packages in Debian, I'm not so sure if we really want that.

The proprietary features require a rebuild of the whole virtualbox
directory, so yes, probably two independent packages would be required.

> Unrelated to that, there are some issues with the build, such as
> requiring linux-headers as build-dependency of virtualbox frontend, not
> the module-source. Where is the proper list to discuss this?

http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev

Kind regards,

Frank
-- 
## InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH, http://www.innotek.de ##

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #36 received at 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>

Cc: 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org, Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, Achim Hasenmueller <achimha@innotek.de>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:48:38 +0100

I've requested an alioth project pkg-virtualbox, we will use this for
the team maintenance of virtualbox and a repository on svn.debian.org.

Frank, please create an account on alioth.debian.org and tell me the
account name, so I can add you as soon as the project is created.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #41 received at 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>

To: daniel@debian.org

Cc: 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org, Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, Achim Hasenmueller <achimha@innotek.de>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:10:50 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:48, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> I've requested an alioth project pkg-virtualbox, we will use this for
> the team maintenance of virtualbox and a repository on svn.debian.org.
>
> Frank, please create an account on alioth.debian.org and tell me the
> account name, so I can add you as soon as the project is created.

fmehnert-guest.

Kind regards,

Frank
-- 
## InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH, http://www.innotek.de ##

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #48 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>

To: 406992@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: ITP: virtualbox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:15:46 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Daniel,

here is a snapshot of the debian/ directory. There is still much work todo.
Not all dependencies are added to debian/control (especially for building
the vboxdrv kernel module). The changelog file is very hackish.

Note that currently no official .tar.gz archives of VBox OSE exist. We plan
to release them within the next days.

Kind regards,

Frank
-- 
## InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH, http://www.innotek.de ##

[virtualbox-ose-debian.tar.gz (application/x-tgz, attachment)]

[Message part 3 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #53 received at 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>, 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: virtualbox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:02:46 +0100

Frank Mehnert wrote:
> Hi Daniel,

Hi,

> here is a snapshot of the debian/ directory. There is still much work todo.
> Not all dependencies are added to debian/control (especially for building
> the vboxdrv kernel module). The changelog file is very hackish.

no problem, I'll merge your things into mine.

> Note that currently no official .tar.gz archives of VBox OSE exist. We plan
> to release them within the next days.

It doesn't actually matter, but real release tarballs looks nicer than
snapshots though :)

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #58 received at 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

Cc: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>, 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org, Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:40:16 +0100

Daniel Baumann wrote:
> I've requested an alioth project pkg-virtualbox, we will use this for
> the team maintenance of virtualbox and a repository on svn.debian.org.

Both were created today and you I added you both to the project. I'll
commit a first version to the svn tomorrow as a basis of discussion.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #63 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Torsten Werner" <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>

To: 406992@bugs.debian.org

Subject: virtualbox

Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:49:12 +0100

Hi,

I could not find anything in the svn repository except a README. What
is the state of the package?

Cheers,
Torsten

-- 
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/

Message #72 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ana Guerrero <ana@debian.org>

To: daniel@debian.org, 406992@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>, Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, Achim Hasenmueller <achimha@innotek.de>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 03:12:20 +0200

Hello all,

On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:48:38PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> I've requested an alioth project pkg-virtualbox, we will use this for
> the team maintenance of virtualbox and a repository on svn.debian.org.
> 
> Frank, please create an account on alioth.debian.org and tell me the
> account name, so I can add you as soon as the project is created.
>

What is the status of this? I have seen in the SVN a first commit from 21th
february and not further activity.

I would love to see virtualbox in Debian, please continue with the packaging
and upload it :)

Thanks,
ana

Message #77 received at 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Torsten Werner" <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>

To: "Ana Guerrero" <ana@debian.org>, 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Cc: daniel@debian.org, "Frank Mehnert" <frank@innotek.de>, "Patrick Winnertz" <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, "Achim Hasenmueller" <achimha@innotek.de>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 07:03:15 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Ana,

On 6/8/07, Ana Guerrero <ana@debian.org> wrote:
> What is the status of this? I have seen in the SVN a first commit from 21th
> february and not further activity.

I'll add my local changes as a diff file but since I did not get write
access to the svn from Daniel I have stopped working on vbox.

Cheers,
Torsten

-- 
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/

[vbox.diff (text/x-c++, attachment)]

Message #82 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: Ana Guerrero <ana@debian.org>, 406992@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>, Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, Achim Hasenmueller <achimha@innotek.de>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:11:01 +0200

Ana Guerrero wrote:
> I would love to see virtualbox in Debian, please continue with the packaging
> and upload it :)

doing final stuff on 1.4.0 this evening, and uploading to NEW tonight.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #87 received at 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Torsten Werner" <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>

To: daniel@debian.org, 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Cc: "Ana Guerrero" <ana@debian.org>, "Frank Mehnert" <frank@innotek.de>, "Patrick Winnertz" <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, "Achim Hasenmueller" <achimha@innotek.de>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:59:39 +0200

Hi Daniel,

On 6/8/07, Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> wrote:
> doing final stuff on 1.4.0 this evening, and uploading to NEW tonight.

which tonight? There is still nothing in NEW and the last svn commit
is from 2007-02-21 (revision 2).


Cheers,
Torsten


-- 
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/

Message #92 received at 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: Torsten Werner <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>

Cc: 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org, Ana Guerrero <ana@debian.org>, Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>, Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, Achim Hasenmueller <achimha@innotek.de>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:01:25 +0200

Torsten Werner wrote:
> which tonight? There is still nothing in NEW and the last svn commit
> is from 2007-02-21 (revision 2).

didn't got it finished; now since saturday at debcamp...

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #97 received at 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Patrick Winnertz <winnie@der-winnie.de>

To: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

Cc: Torsten Werner <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>, 406992-quiet@bugs.debian.org, Ana Guerrero <ana@debian.org>, Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>, Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, Achim Hasenmueller <achimha@innotek.de>

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:17:15 +0200

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote:

> Torsten Werner wrote:
> > which tonight? There is still nothing in NEW and the last svn commit
> > is from 2007-02-21 (revision 2).
> 
> didn't got it finished; now since saturday at debcamp...
Much fun there..

If you have something that work partly, please!!! commit it into the svn, so
that I can work further on it! :) 

Greetings
Patrick


> 
> -- 
> Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
> Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
> Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
> 

-- 
 .''`.   Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>
: :'  :  GNU/Linux Debian-Edu Developer
`. `'`   http://www.der-winnie.de http://d.skolelinux.org/~winnie
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 

Message #108 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andreas Beckmann <debian@abeckmann.de>

To: 406992@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>, Torsten Werner <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>, Philipp Hug <debian@hug.cx>

Subject: virtualbox FTBFS

Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:17:30 +0200

Hi,

since virtualbox is still stuck in the NEW queue, I tried to build it
myself for i386 from the pkg-virtualbox subversion repository with a
tarball repackaged according to the instructions in
debian/README.rebuild and found the following problems (using a sid
pbuilder environment):

* it lacks a Build-Depends: libhal-dev
* somewhere a hard coded yasm path pointing to tools/linux.x86/bin/yasm
  is used, i fixed this by creating this directory and a symlink there
  to /usr/bin/yasm in debian/rules
* it seems to look for kernel headers in /usr/src/linux
  after several tries to use the ones in /usr/include I still got
  missing headers and finally gave up.
  The configure option --with-linux=... seemed not to work.
  The following patch helped a bit: in Config.kmk set
     export VBOX_LINUX_SRC           := /usr

The buildds probably will fail with the same errors.

Is there a pkg-virtualbox developer mailinglist? Since I couldn't find
one I attach this information to the ITP.


Andreas

Message #113 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andreas Beckmann <debian@abeckmann.de>

To: 406992@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>, Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>, Torsten Werner <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>, Philipp Hug <debian@hug.cx>

Subject: Re: virtualbox FTBFS

Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:02:17 +0200

Hi all,

after several more tries, I finally could compile virtualbox (in a 
pbuilder sid i386 environment).

The following changes were neccessary
* drop Build-Depends: gcc-3.4, g++-3.4
* drop 01-compiler.dpatch, 02-kernel.dpatch
* add a Depends: kbuild to virtualbox-source

Concerning the kernel headers: It looks like the kernel headers of the 
currently running kernel is needed. Using a different set, e.g. 
2.6.18-4-686 or 2.6.21-2-k7 instead of the running 2.6.21-2-k7-686 
results in some undefined symbols (sorry, can't tell which, didn't save 
a log).
So I did the following:
* add Build-Depends: linux-header-2.6-all
and in debian/rules I set
* ./configure --with-linux=/usr/src/linux-headers-`uname -r`
Unfortunetly, the requires the buildds to run the latest sid kernel in 
order to be able to compile virtualbox.

I also tried to compile virtualbox from the svn trunk: 
03-configure.dpatch needed to be rediffed, but afterwards everything 
went without problems.


And now: I'm gonna try it :-)


Andreas

Message #118 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>

To: 406992@bugs.debian.org

Subject: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:23:22 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

I just solved the most disgusting lintian warnings/errors be moving all files
out of /opt/VirtualBox-xzy to their (hopefully) proper place. I exported our
debian scripts to our external repository.

I would be appreciated if we could solve the remaining problems together. So
far I see the following problems:

- still no copyright file, we will provide one
- no manpages
- unstrippped binary objects: We cannot change this because we need to load
  these modules at runtime (similar as XFree86 did before they switched
  to .so modules)
- our .so libs have no major/minor. Not sure if we should really provide one
  but this induces some lintian warnings
- How to generate the SVN as part of the version? I would like to do it like
  Torsten did it with his kBuild package
- In case you are asking: the lintian overrides for PIC code in our shared
  libs are necessary, currently no way to build them as PIC.
- the package still compiles the kernel module during install, I assume this
  should be removed (and the module stuff in preinst/postinst as well)

Maybe others.

I would like to hear your opinion.

Frank
-- 
## innotek GmbH, http://www.innotek.de ##

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #123 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

To: Frank Mehnert <frank@innotek.de>, 406992@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#406992: ITP: VirtualBox -- x86 virtualization solution

Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:54:22 +0200

Frank Mehnert wrote:
> I would be appreciated if we could solve the remaining problems together.

sure.

> - still no copyright file, we will provide one

good.

> - no manpages
> - unstrippped binary objects: We cannot change this because we need to load
>   these modules at runtime (similar as XFree86 did before they switched
>   to .so modules)
> - our .so libs have no major/minor. Not sure if we should really provide one
>   but this induces some lintian warnings

not so much of a problem for a first upload, can be fixed later.

> - How to generate the SVN as part of the version? I would like to do it like
>   Torsten did it with his kBuild package

nope; for release software, the proper version scheme is e.g. 1.4.0-1,
1.4.0-2 etc.; and for svn snapshots it would be
1.4.0+${date}.${svn_revision}-1 (or 1.4.0+${date}-1 for short).

> - In case you are asking: the lintian overrides for PIC code in our shared
>   libs are necessary, currently no way to build them as PIC.

not so much of a problem for a first upload, can be fixed later.

> - the package still compiles the kernel module during install, I assume this
>   should be removed (and the module stuff in preinst/postinst as well)

don't worry about the kernel module, i'll take care about that.

i'm in holidays until friday evening. if you fix the copyright and
license stuff until then, i can prepare an upload to unstable at
saturday morning.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Message #128 received at 406992@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Arthur Loiret" <arthur.loiret@gmail.com>

To: 406992@bugs.debian.org

Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:32:06 +0200

Hello,

I've a new module build system which should fix those module issues:

* Build depens on linux-headers-2.6, which should install the latest
kernel headers.
* get the kernel version we are going to build for then, having a look
to /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6*
* create a debian/dirs from it
* configure --with-linux=$version, still the version we got in
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6*
* add a deps on linux-image-$version

The downside is that it will work *only* if you re-upload a new
revision for each new kernel package.

I have to clean up a bit my debian/rules and I'll send it to you if
you are interested.

Thanks for your time, have a nice day.

Arthur.

PS: I think the binary package should be named virtualbox-ose and not
virtualbox, as upstream already provides debian package and as the
versions (ose and non-ose) packaged are not the same.

Message #133 received at 406992-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>

To: 406992-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#406992: fixed in virtualbox 1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1

Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 08:03:08 +0000

Source: virtualbox
Source-Version: 1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
virtualbox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

virtualbox-source_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/v/virtualbox/virtualbox-source_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1_all.deb
virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/v/virtualbox/virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1.diff.gz
virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1.dsc
  to pool/main/v/virtualbox/virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1.dsc
virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/v/virtualbox/virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1_amd64.deb
virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/v/virtualbox/virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 406992@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org> (supplier of updated virtualbox package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:35:51 +0200
Source: virtualbox
Binary: virtualbox-source virtualbox
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>
Changed-By: Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz@skolelinux.org>
Description: 
 virtualbox - PC virtualization solution
 virtualbox-source - Source for the VirtualBox module
Closes: 406992 407001 409711
Changes: 
 virtualbox (1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Philipp Hug ]
   * Stripped kbuild and yasm from source tarball
   * Use Debian's kbuild and yasm instead
   * Added myself as uploader
   * Build target for module is now all instead of module
   * Build against correct kernel source
   * Integrated changes by Patrick Winnertz
   * clean: rm env.sh AutoConfig.kmk configure.log
   * Install udev rules to automatically create device
   * Automatically create vboxusers group
   * Binary names are now lowercase
   * Disabled stripping for VMM because it breaks VirtualBox
   * Don't require kernel module, recommend it instead
 .
   [ Patrick Winnertz ]
   * Initial release (Closes: #406992, #407001, #409711).
   * Remove Microsoft license stuff from orig.tar.gz (repackaged it )
     See dfsg-free section in debian/rules for details.
   * Added patch to use own yasm
   * Added patch to remove Additions from the Makefile.kmk
   * Remove ./src/libs/xpcom18a4/nsprpub/build/autoconf from source tarball.
   * Doesn't depend on gcc-3.4 and g++-3.4 since they are going to be removed from
     debian. Use default instead.
     Therefore I removed the patch, too.
   * Don't call dh_installdeb twice.  (build-dep & build-indep)
   * Added section to create dfsg tarball automatically to debian/rules (experimental!!)
   * Added lintian.overrides for -fPIC since somehow virtualbox doesn't work with
   * Added patch to prevent building modules and kernel code when building the
     gui.
   * Install udev rule with virtualbox and not with the module, since several
     modules for several kernels could be there.
   * Improved copyright statements in copyright file.
   * Corrected .desktop file
Files: 
 aea4ea5144cce1192289d527d8f0cb4c 957 misc optional virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1.dsc
 3aff43925e9e707496bf512527830bb0 9206709 misc optional virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg.orig.tar.gz
 5934bc8dad24b8e95ede0b4dd9d27315 26271 misc optional virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1.diff.gz
 bcea0bf530c54dac11125d5cecd03c94 6199698 misc optional virtualbox_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1_amd64.deb
 54cf43179b75f8004d6afc3dc0b7cff5 155118 misc optional virtualbox-source_1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG1riaVkEm8inxm9ERAvYNAJ4nSPSoUdyfu1iBAqIoDqfoshoPMACfW4OI
SVCjmcWidHjA40kWUixmVUI=
=4//L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.