Debian Bug report logs -
#396449
e2defrag - Unable to allocate buffer for inode priorities
Reported by: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:48:41 UTC
Severity: grave
Found in version defrag/0.73pjm1-8
Fixed in version 0.73pjm1-8+rm
Done: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>:
Bug#396449; Package defrag.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Package: defrag
Version: 0.73pjm1-8
Severity: grave
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:10:50AM +0800, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > So now it was time to defrag, I used this command:
> > thor:~# e2defrag -r /dev/vgraid/data
>
> This program is dangerous to use and any attempts to use it should be
> stopped. It hasn't been updated in such a long time that it doesn't
> even KNOW that it is dangerous (i.e. it doesn't check the filesystem
> version number or feature flags).
In fact we need to create a Debian bug report indicating that this
package should *NOT* be included when the Debian etch distribution
releases.
Goswin, I am setting the severity to grave (a release-critical
severity) because defrag right now is almost guaranteed to corrupt the
filesystem if used with modern ext3 filesystems leading to data loss,
and this satisfies the definition of grave. I believe the correct
answer is either to (a) make defrag refuse to run if any filesystem
features are enabled (at the very least, resize_inode, but some of the
other newer ext3 filesystem features make me nervous with respect to
e2defrag, or (b) since (a) would make e2defrag mostly useless
especially since filesystems with resize inodes are created by default
in etch, and as far as I know upstream abandoned defrag a long time
ago, that we should simply remove e2defrag from etch and probably from
Debian altogether.
If you are interested in doing a huge amount of auditing and testing
of e2defrag with modern ext3 (and soon ext4) filesystems, that's
great, but I suspect that will not at all be trivial, and even making
sure e2defrag won't scramble users' data probably can't be achievable
before etch releases.
Regards,
- Ted
Reply sent to Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>:
You have taken responsibility.
(full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent to Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #10 received at 396449-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Version: 0.73pjm1-8+rm
The defrag package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/446691 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Lucas
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org.
(Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:50:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Fri Jan 12 02:04:46 2018;
Machine Name:
buxtehude
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.