Debian Bug report logs - #390703
digikam: shouldn't depend on libgphoto2-2-dev

version graph

Package: digikam; Maintainer for digikam is Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>; Source for digikam is src:digikam (PTS, buildd, popcon).

Reported by: Jan De Luyck <jan-bugs@kcore.org>

Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:48:23 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: upstream

Merged with 416123

Found in versions digikam/1:0.8.2-2, digikam/2:0.8.2-4

Fixed in version digikam/2:0.9.3~beta3-1

Done: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Forwarded to http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Jan De Luyck <jan-bugs@kcore.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jan De Luyck <jan-bugs@kcore.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: digikam: shouldn't depend on libgphoto2-2-dev
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:28:00 +0200
Package: digikam
Version: 1:0.8.2-2
Severity: normal


I have no idea why digikam depends on libgphoto2-2-dev, I've dug through
the contents of said development package, but couldn't really find a 
reason.

Maybe this dependency can be removed?

Thanks,

Jan


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages digikam depends on:
ii  dcraw                       8.38-1       decode raw digital camera images
ii  kdelibs4c2a                 4:3.5.4-3    core libraries and binaries for al
ii  libacl1                     2.2.41-1     Access control list shared library
ii  libart-2.0-2                2.3.17-1     Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libattr1                    2.4.32-1     Extended attribute shared library
ii  libaudio2                   1.8-2        The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc6                       2.3.6.ds1-5  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libexif12                   0.6.13-4     library to parse EXIF files
ii  libfam0                     2.7.0-10     Client library to control the FAM 
ii  libfontconfig1              2.4.1-2      generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6                2.2.1-5      FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1                     1:4.1.1-15   GCC support library
ii  libgphoto2-2                2.2.1-5      gphoto2 digital camera library
ii  libgphoto2-2-dev            2.2.1-5      gphoto2 digital camera library (de
ii  libgphoto2-port0            2.2.1-5      gphoto2 digital camera port librar
ii  libice6                     1:1.0.1-2    X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11                    0.6.5-1      GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libimlib2                   1.2.1-2      powerful image loading and renderi
ii  libjpeg62                   6b-13        The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libkexif1                   0.2.3-2      library for KDE to read/display/ed
ii  libkipi0                    0.1.4-1      library for apps that want to use 
ii  libpng12-0                  1.2.8rel-5.2 PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3-mt                   3:3.3.6-4    Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6                      1:1.0.1-3    X11 Session Management library
ii  libsqlite3-0                3.3.7-1      SQLite 3 shared library
ii  libstdc++6                  4.1.1-15     The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4                    3.8.2-6      Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6                    2:1.0.0-9    X11 client-side library
ii  libxcursor1                 1.1.7-4      X cursor management library
ii  libxext6                    1:1.0.1-2    X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxft2                     2.1.8.2-8    FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6                      1:1.0.1-3    X11 Input extension library
ii  libxinerama1                1:1.0.1-4.1  X11 Xinerama extension library
ii  libxrandr2                  2:1.1.0.2-4  X11 RandR extension library
ii  libxrender1                 1:0.9.1-3    X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6                      1:1.0.2-2    X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.3-13   compression library - runtime

Versions of packages digikam recommends:
ii  digikamimageplugins         0.8.2-3      image editor plugins for digikam a
ii  kdeprint                    4:3.5.4-2+b2 print system for KDE
ii  kipi-plugins                0.1.2-3      image manipulation/handling plugin
ii  konqueror                   4:3.5.4-2+b2 KDE's advanced file manager, web b

-- no debconf information



Message sent on to Jan De Luyck <jan-bugs@kcore.org>:
Bug#390703. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #8 received at 390703-submitter@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sune Vuorela <debian@pusling.com>
To: 390703-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#390703: digikam: shouldn't depend on libgphoto2-2-dev
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:35:59 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Monday 02 October 2006 18:28, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Package: digikam
> Version: 1:0.8.2-2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> I have no idea why digikam depends on libgphoto2-2-dev, I've dug through
> the contents of said development package, but couldn't really find a
> reason.

Please see this debian-bug:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=374460


You can try to do a dpkg --remove --force-depends libgphoto2-2-dev to test if 
all works as expected withotu the -dev package
that temporarily 'hoses' apt, but apt-get -f install can fix it again.

If everything works after trying to remove that package, please report it 
again. If not, then please close this bug by mailing 
390703-done@bugs.debian.org

/Sune
-- 
How may I digit from a server of the memory over a proxy?

First of all you must doubleclick a wordprocessor to load to a RAM 
application.
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information stored:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Jan De Luyck <jan-bugs@kcore.org>:
Extra info received and filed, but not forwarded. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #13 received at 390703-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jan De Luyck <jan-bugs@kcore.org>
To: Sune Vuorela <debian@pusling.com>, 390703-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#390703: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#390703: digikam: shouldn't depend on libgphoto2-2-dev
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:03:05 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Monday 02 October 2006 19:35, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> You can try to do a dpkg --remove --force-depends libgphoto2-2-dev to test
> if all works as expected withotu the -dev package

I've just tried that, all works as it should with my Canon Powershot A95 
camera.

> If everything works after trying to remove that package, please report it
> again.

Hereby, confirming that it seems this dependency is (no longer?) necessary.

Kind regards,

Jan
-- 
I guess you guys got BIG MUSCLES from doing too much STUDYING!
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #18 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
To: 390703@bugs.debian.org, 390703-submitter@bugs.debian.org, libgphoto2-2-dev@packages.debian.org
Subject: Dependancy on libgphoto2-2-dev still necessary
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:14:11 +0100
After having a look the dependency on libgphoto2-2-dev is still necessary.

Without it the list of cameras does not appear..

This is I guess really a libgphoto2-2-dev issue.

Mark



Message sent on to Jan De Luyck <jan-bugs@kcore.org>:
Bug#390703. (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Frederic Peters <fpeters@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #26 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frederic Peters <fpeters@debian.org>
To: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
Cc: 390703@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Dependancy on libgphoto2-2-dev still necessary
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:38:49 +0200
Mark Purcell wrote:

> After having a look the dependency on libgphoto2-2-dev is still necessary.
> 
> Without it the list of cameras does not appear..
> 
> This is I guess really a libgphoto2-2-dev issue.

I don't have bandwidth right now to look at digikam but for the record
gthumb works fine listing cameras even with libgphoto2-2-dev not
installed (just tested again).

I really do believe it is in issue with digikam.

Woul you mind strace -e trace=file digikam and look for files from
libgphoto2-2-dev ?


Thanks,

        Frederic



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #31 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
To: Frederic Peters <fpeters@debian.org>
Cc: 390703@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Dependancy on libgphoto2-2-dev still necessary
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:36:14 +0100
Thanks Federic,

On Friday 20 October 2006 21:38, Frederic Peters wrote:
> I don't have bandwidth right now to look at digikam but for the record
> gthumb works fine listing cameras even with libgphoto2-2-dev not
> installed (just tested again).
>
> I really do believe it is in issue with digikam.

Don't mind where the issue is, it would just be nice to get to the bottom and 
fixup ;-)

>
> Woul you mind strace -e trace=file digikam and look for files from
> libgphoto2-2-dev ?

Looks like digikam is looking for a couple of .la files, which doesn't sound 
right...  Some examples are disk.la & usb.la which are only in 
libgphoto2-2-dev.

Mark

open("/usr/lib/libgphoto2_port/0.6.1", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|
O_DIRECTORY) = 23
open("/usr/lib/libgphoto2_port/0.6.1/disk.la", O_RDONLY) = 23

open("/usr/lib/libgphoto2_port/0.6.1/usb.la", O_RDONLY) = 23
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY)      = 23
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK)      = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
open("/lib/tls/i686/cmov/usb.a", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
open("/lib/tls/i686/usb.a", O_RDONLY)   = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
open("/lib/tls/usb.a", O_RDONLY)        = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
open("/lib/usb.a", O_RDONLY)            = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
open("/usr/lib/i686/cmov/usb.a", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
open("/usr/lib/i686/usb.a", O_RDONLY)   = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)



Merged 390703 396249. Request was from Frederic Peters <fpeters@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (full text, mbox, link).


Disconnected #390703 from all other report(s). Request was from Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #40 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
To: 390703@bugs.debian.org
Subject: digikam runtime dependency on libgpthoto2-2-dev
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:30:35 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Achim,

From the svn/experimental changelog you made the entry:

    + remove runtime dependency on libgpthoto2-2-dev. No longer necessary.


I think the runtime dependency on libgphoto is still required.

Without it installed, when I go into the Camera/Add Camera.../Add.., the 'Camera List' is totally empty.

With libgphoto2-2-dev installed the Camera List details cameras supported by libghoto.

http://bugs.debian.org/390703 refers.

Mark
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696. Request was from Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #47 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
To: Frederic Peters <fpeters@debian.org>
Cc: 390703@bugs.debian.org, marcus@jet.franken.de
Subject: Re: Bug#390703: Dependancy on libgphoto2-2-dev still necessary
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:29:04 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
clone 390703 -1
reassign -1 libgphoto2-2
retitle -1 libgphoto2: .la files for the camlibs and ports MUST be in the runtime package
severity -1 important
block 390703 by -1
thanks

Frederic,

One of the upstream devs for libgphoto,  Marcus Meissner, has said that:
	".la files for the camlibs and ports MUST be in the runtime package, as they are not development files but are used during runtime"

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696#c20

I have cloned the bug from the Debian BTS and assigned it to libgphoto2, noting it's blocking the fix for digikam.

Marcus, if you do reply, could I ask you to maintain the Cc: so your response is tracked in the Debian Bug Tracking System (BTS).
http://bugs.debian.org/390703

Thanks,
Mark

On Friday 20 October 2006 21:38, Frederic Peters wrote:
> I don't have bandwidth right now to look at digikam but for the record
> gthumb works fine listing cameras even with libgphoto2-2-dev not
> installed (just tested again).
> 
> I really do believe it is in issue with digikam.
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Marcus Meissner <marcus@jet.franken.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #52 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marcus Meissner <marcus@jet.franken.de>
To: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
Cc: Frederic Peters <fpeters@debian.org>, 390703@bugs.debian.org, marcus@jet.franken.de
Subject: Re: Bug#390703: Dependancy on libgphoto2-2-dev still necessary
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:34:26 +0100
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 06:29:04PM +0000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> clone 390703 -1
> reassign -1 libgphoto2-2
> retitle -1 libgphoto2: .la files for the camlibs and ports MUST be in the runtime package
> severity -1 important
> block 390703 by -1
> thanks
> 
> Frederic,
> 
> One of the upstream devs for libgphoto,  Marcus Meissner, has said that:
> 	".la files for the camlibs and ports MUST be in the runtime package, as they are not development files but are used during runtime"
> 
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696#c20
> 
> I have cloned the bug from the Debian BTS and assigned it to libgphoto2, noting it's blocking the fix for digikam.
> 
> Marcus, if you do reply, could I ask you to maintain the Cc: so your response is tracked in the Debian Bug Tracking System (BTS).
> http://bugs.debian.org/390703

Err, actually the .la files not necessary as I now know. ... Sorry for the confusion.

Ciao, Marcus



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Marcus Meissner <marcus@jet.franken.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #57 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marcus Meissner <marcus@jet.franken.de>
To: 390703@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Marcus Meissner <marcus@jet.franken.de>
Subject: Re: Bug#390703: Info received (Bug#390703: Dependancy on libgphoto2-2-dev still necessary)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:31:29 +0100
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:48:14AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

I am sorry, I was mistaken....

Further investigations shows a conflict between the KDE builtin libltdl
(in libkdecore) and the external ones and how libgphoto2 uses it.

This conflict needs to be resolved first ...

Until then please include the .la files.



Merged 390703 416123. Request was from Mark Purcell <mark@purcell.id.au> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 29 Apr 2007 07:06:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Tags added: upstream Request was from Mark Purcell <mark@purcell.id.au> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 29 Apr 2007 07:09:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Tags added: upstream Request was from Mark Purcell <mark@purcell.id.au> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 29 Apr 2007 07:09:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #68 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
To: Luka Renko <lure@ubuntu.com>
Cc: 390703@bugs.debian.org, kdelibs@packages.debian.org
Subject: ubuntu digikam no longer requires libgphoto-2-2-dev
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:39:20 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Luka,

I see from the ubuntu changelog for digikam that you claim that you no longer 
need the libgphoto .la files due to the difference in the way the Kubuntu KDE 
has been built.

I can confirm I am still having this problem in Debian with the 0.9.2 final 
release package.

Can you provide some details so we can get this fixed in Debian?

Thanks,
Mark


+digikam (2:0.9.2~beta2-1ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low
+
+  * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes:
+    - debian/control: don't depend on libgphoto2-2-dev.  
+      Kubuntu's KDE finds the libgphoto plugins without the .la files.
+    - debian/patches/11-add-service-menu-translations.diff:
+      Rework patch to apply - French translation of .desktop file 
+  * Added debian/patches/digikam-svn-r669532.diff: 
+    Post-Beta2 fix from KDE SVN for preview bug. Closes: KDE #146072.
+
+ -- Luka Renko <lure@ubuntu.com>  Wed, 30 May 2007 19:36:57 +0200
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Achim Bohnet <ach@mpe.mpg.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #73 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Achim Bohnet <ach@mpe.mpg.de>
To: pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org, Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>, 390703@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Luka Renko <lure@ubuntu.com>, kdelibs@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#390703: ubuntu digikam no longer requires libgphoto-2-2-dev
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:34:37 +0200
On Tuesday, 19. June 2007, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Luka,
> 
> I see from the ubuntu changelog for digikam that you claim that you no longer 
> need the libgphoto .la files due to the difference in the way the Kubuntu KDE 
> has been built.

Kubuntu _never_ needed the libgphoto2-dev .la files.  This
change is most of the time the only change in the digikam
kubuntu pkg.

> I can confirm I am still having this problem in Debian with the 0.9.2 final 
> release package.

Damn :(   Have you the time to try the fix described

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696#c28

and following comments?
> 
> Can you provide some details so we can get this fixed in Debian?

Lure and me discussed it on #kubuntu-devel on freenode. Up to now
we found nothing that explains the difference.

Maybe, while at debconf, you can join  #debian-qt-kde on oftc.
Lure and myself are usualy there too.

Achim
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
> 
> 
> +digikam (2:0.9.2~beta2-1ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low
> +
> +  * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes:
> +    - debian/control: don't depend on libgphoto2-2-dev.  
> +      Kubuntu's KDE finds the libgphoto plugins without the .la files.
> +    - debian/patches/11-add-service-menu-translations.diff:
> +      Rework patch to apply - French translation of .desktop file 
> +  * Added debian/patches/digikam-svn-r669532.diff: 
> +    Post-Beta2 fix from KDE SVN for preview bug. Closes: KDE #146072.
> +
> + -- Luka Renko <lure@ubuntu.com>  Wed, 30 May 2007 19:36:57 +0200
> 



-- 
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- reddy@lion.austin.ibm.com



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Jonathan Riddell <jriddell@ubuntu.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #78 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jonathan Riddell <jriddell@ubuntu.com>
To: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
Cc: Luka Renko <lure@ubuntu.com>, 390703@bugs.debian.org, kdelibs@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: ubuntu digikam no longer requires libgphoto-2-2-dev
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:48:31 +0100
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:39:20PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Luka,
> 
> I see from the ubuntu changelog for digikam that you claim that you no longer 
> need the libgphoto .la files due to the difference in the way the Kubuntu KDE 
> has been built.
> 
> I can confirm I am still having this problem in Debian with the 0.9.2 final 
> release package.
> 
> Can you provide some details so we can get this fixed in Debian?

I've not looked into this myself, but there's nothing I know of that
Ubuntu does which should make any difference.  I asked Matthias Klose
who suggested Ubuntu might happen to have a reference to the gphoto.so
file which Debian doesn't.  I can see in /usr/lib/libdigikam.la
dependency_libs='.../usr/lib/libgphoto2.la /usr/lib/libexif.la
/usr/lib/libgphoto2_port.la...' but I have neither of those files
installed so I'm at a bit of a loss what the difference could be.

Jonathan



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#390703; Package digikam. (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Achim Bohnet <ach@mpe.mpg.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org>. (full text, mbox, link).


Message #83 received at 390703@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Achim Bohnet <ach@mpe.mpg.de>
To: Jonathan Riddell <jriddell@ubuntu.com>, 390703@bugs.debian.org, Marcus Meissner <marcus@jet.franken.de>
Cc: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>, Luka Renko <lure@ubuntu.com>, kdelibs@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#390703: ubuntu digikam no longer requires libgphoto-2-2-dev
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:14:52 +0200
On Wednesday, 27. June 2007, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:39:20PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > Luka,
> > 
> > I see from the ubuntu changelog for digikam that you claim that you no longer 
> > need the libgphoto .la files due to the difference in the way the Kubuntu KDE 
> > has been built.
> > 
> > I can confirm I am still having this problem in Debian with the 0.9.2 final 
> > release package.
> > 
> > Can you provide some details so we can get this fixed in Debian?
> 
> I've not looked into this myself, but there's nothing I know of that
> Ubuntu does which should make any difference.  I asked Matthias Klose

Best hint we have up to now is Marcus Meissners msg from 19 Jan
in this bug report thread:

  ...
  Further investigations shows a conflict between the KDE builtin libltdl
  (in libkdecore) and the external ones and how libgphoto2 uses it.
   ...

Marcus: can you elaborate how you found this out?  Makes for us (or is it
only me?) 'glueless' hopefully easier to compare kubuntu and debian to find
out what needs to be changed in debian.

> who suggested Ubuntu might happen to have a reference to the gphoto.so
> file which Debian doesn't.  I can see in /usr/lib/libdigikam.la
> dependency_libs='.../usr/lib/libgphoto2.la /usr/lib/libexif.la
> /usr/lib/libgphoto2_port.la...' but I have neither of those files
> installed so I'm at a bit of a loss what the difference could be.

Not the build-deps of digikam on disk? ;)

(0) ~ $ dpkg -L libgphoto2-2-dev | grep la
...
/usr/lib/libgphoto2_port.la
/usr/lib/libgphoto2_port/0.7.0/serial.la
/usr/lib/libgphoto2_port/0.7.0/usb.la
/usr/lib/libgphoto2_port/0.7.0/disk.la
/usr/lib/libgphoto2_port/0.7.0/ptpip.la
/usr/lib/libgphoto2.la
...

Achim

> Jonathan
-- 
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- reddy@lion.austin.ibm.com



Tags added: pending Request was from Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:06:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:26:46 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Fri Jan 5 13:10:41 2018; Machine Name: buxtehude

Debian Bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.