Debian Bug report logs - #370194
atokx: broken hard-coded dependency on non-existent packages

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: atokx: broken hard-coded dependency on non-existent packages

Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 17:50:21 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: atokx
Version: 1.0-16
Severity: grave

The atokx installer package has a hard-coded dependency on xlibs (>= 4.0) |
xlib6g.  Both of these packages are obsolete, rendering this package
uninstallable in unstable.  While contrib packages are allowed to depend on
packages outside of main, in this case there is no version of either package
generally available, in or outside of Debian, which is compatible with etch.
Please update your package to depend on the individual X11R7 library
packages that are needed for operation.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #10 received at 370194@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>

To: 370194@bugs.debian.org

Subject: atokx - removal?

Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:25:03 +0200

Heya,

I've noticed the rc bug on atokx, which is quite old. You don't seem to
care much about the package nowadays, and popcon reports that noone uses
it anyway. Perhaps we should remove it from the archive?

Marc
-- 
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
79: Usenet
       Ich habe zuviel Freizeit. (Florian Kuehnert)

Message #15 received at 370194@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Taku YASUI" <tach@debian.or.jp>

To: Amaya <amaya@debian.org>

Cc: "Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt" <marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>, 370194@bugs.debian.org, bubulle@debian.org

Subject: Re: Status of atokx in Debian

Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:17:59 +0900

Hi all,

I apologize for my late reply.

I'm in work about atokx package now.
It is commercial software as you know, and it's very old.
And, I'd like to change package structure to use debian
version iiimf-server instead of atokx commercial archive.
(It is in experimental)
Because each of them use the same port.

I'm trying to create and test new package but it does not
work correctly yet.

So, please wait a few days to try it.  I'd like to keep atokx
into debian archive and add it to etch.
But..., atokx depends on iiimf-server but it is not in etch,
only in unstable.  Hmm...

Anyway, I will upload new atokx package to unsable in a few days.

Thank you,

2007/1/26, Amaya <amaya@debian.org>:
> Hi all
>
> Mark wrote:
> > I've noticed the rc bug on atokx, which is quite old. You don't seem
> > to care much about the package nowadays, and popcon reports that noone
> > uses it anyway. Perhaps we should remove it from the archive?
>
> atokx has already been removed from testing. Can we file a RFR now?
>
> Or is the version in experimental any better? Why is it marked as
> dangerous in the changelog?
>
> I mean, it is just a installer for commercial software. How can this be
> a dangerous version? Is this software still relevant? What are the
> dangers?
>
> Taku, can you ellaborate?
>
> --
>   ·''`.             If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
>  : :' :                                            -- Emma Goldman
>  `. `'           Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
>    `-     www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com
>
>

-- 
Taku YASUI <tach@debian.or.jp>

Message #20 received at 370194-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Taku YASUI <tach@debian.or.jp>

To: 370194-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#370194: fixed in atokx 1.0-18

Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:32:02 +0000

Source: atokx
Source-Version: 1.0-18

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
atokx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

atokx_1.0-18.dsc
  to pool/contrib/a/atokx/atokx_1.0-18.dsc
atokx_1.0-18.tar.gz
  to pool/contrib/a/atokx/atokx_1.0-18.tar.gz
atokx_1.0-18_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/atokx/atokx_1.0-18_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 370194@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Taku YASUI <tach@debian.or.jp> (supplier of updated atokx package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  7 Feb 2007 22:06:07 +0900
Source: atokx
Binary: atokx
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Taku YASUI <tach@debian.or.jp>
Changed-By: Taku YASUI <tach@debian.or.jp>
Description: 
 atokx      - Kana-Kanji translation system ATOKX for Linux (Installer)
Closes: 314148 319404 330457 331749 370194 396042 408337
Changes: 
 atokx (1.0-18) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add dependency libx11-6 (closes: #370194)
   * Use cdbs to build
   * Add im-switch feature
   * Add Conflicts: debian iiimf servers
   * Change depricated isdefault flag to seen flag
   * Add debconf-2.0 dependency (closes: #331749)
   * Add pt.po (closes: #408337)
   * Add cs.po (closes: #319404)
   * Add sv.po (closes: #330457)
   * Update de.po (closes: #314148, #396042)
Files: 
 250231e4df214329d3d4f8389a6ccf64 506 contrib/utils optional atokx_1.0-18.dsc
 87cd82d52c4e4c6e829866b061d9cc40 15747 contrib/utils optional atokx_1.0-18.tar.gz
 74e03a8c5fc34f1e555612a119a1e4e7 9566 contrib/utils optional atokx_1.0-18_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFyc+XFwU5DuZsm7ARApeEAKCgtPrqYHYj2sP57BmLqVWzIeh3YgCdEcrl
b4WeWcATrxtG6+GRPL2fapI=
=JhvM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.