Debian Bug report logs - #363193
pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 02:44:02 +0200

Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.150
Severity: normal

pbuilder-satisfydepends does not understand architecture specifications
like "linux-any" in build dependencies, which dpkg-dev introduced
recently (e.g., "Build-Depends: libasound2-dev [linux-any]").  I am at a
Linux system and see

 -> Considering  libasound2-dev [linux-any]
   -> This package is not for this architecture

Message #10 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:26:48 +0900

Hi,

> pbuilder-satisfydepends does not understand architecture specifications
> like "linux-any" in build dependencies, which dpkg-dev introduced
> recently (e.g., "Build-Depends: libasound2-dev [linux-any]").  I am at a
> Linux system and see

Which version of dpkg?


regards,
	junichi
-- 
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project

Message #15 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Cc: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:24:58 +0200

Am Dienstag, 18. April 2006 15:26 schrieb Junichi Uekawa:
> > pbuilder-satisfydepends does not understand architecture specifications
> > like "linux-any" in build dependencies, which dpkg-dev introduced
> > recently (e.g., "Build-Depends: libasound2-dev [linux-any]").  I am at a
> > Linux system and see
>
> Which version of dpkg?

I'm using 1.13.17, but the feature was introduced in 1.13.12, in case that is 
what you were wondering.

Message #20 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

Cc: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:07:45 +0900

Hi,

> > > pbuilder-satisfydepends does not understand architecture specifications
> > > like "linux-any" in build dependencies, which dpkg-dev introduced
> > > recently (e.g., "Build-Depends: libasound2-dev [linux-any]").  I am at a
> > > Linux system and see
> >
> > Which version of dpkg?
> 
> I'm using 1.13.17, but the feature was introduced in 1.13.12, in case that is 
> what you were wondering.

Thanks.

If it's a feature added in that version, it's probably not for general
consumption before etch release.

But anyway, pbuilder should better support it by etch.
Ho hum.


So, how do I expand the wildcards ?
y

c.f. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291939

regards,
	junichi
-- 
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project

Message #25 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Cc: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 23:26:30 +0200

Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> If it's a feature added in that version, it's probably not for
> general consumption before etch release.

I'm hoping that we can get full support for it before etch, so that we 
can get rid of various clumsy workarounds like type-handling and 
auto-updating control files.  The stuff is already starting to be in 
use, but if you choose to use it, you can't use pbuilder anymore, which 
is a shame.

> So, how do I expand the wildcards ?

Steal the code from dpkg-checkbuilddeps and /usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl, 
respectively.

Thanks.

Message #30 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

Cc: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 08:18:51 +0900

Hi,

> > If it's a feature added in that version, it's probably not for
> > general consumption before etch release.
> 
> I'm hoping that we can get full support for it before etch, so that we 
> can get rid of various clumsy workarounds like type-handling and 
> auto-updating control files.  The stuff is already starting to be in 
> use, but if you choose to use it, you can't use pbuilder anymore, which 
> is a shame.
> 
> > So, how do I expand the wildcards ?
> 
> Steal the code from dpkg-checkbuilddeps and /usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl, 
> respectively.

pbuilder is in shell, not perl, so it is more convenient if there's
something outside that.


regards, 
	junichi
-- 
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project

Message #35 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:50:02 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Here is a patch that resolves this.

[patch-363193.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Message #42 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 03:08:31 +0900

Hi,

Have you actually tested this patch?

ARCH is the current running architecture, which won't be linux-any etc.

regards,
	junichi


> diff -Nru --exclude pbuilder-doc.html /tmp/lJIc1Y81Rq/pbuilder-0.152/debian/changelog /tmp/H2m1HBzCBJ/pbuilder-0.152/debian/changelog
> --- /tmp/lJIc1Y81Rq/pbuilder-0.152/debian/changelog	2006-04-26 02:33:36.000000000 +0200
> +++ /tmp/H2m1HBzCBJ/pbuilder-0.152/debian/changelog	2006-05-13 14:30:39.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> +pbuilder (0.152-0.1) TEST; urgency=low
> +
> +  * Support for new style architecture specifications (closes: #363193)
> +
> + -- Peter Eisentraut <petere@debian.org>  Sat, 13 May 2006 14:29:52 +0200
> +
>  pbuilder (0.152) unstable; urgency=low
>  
>    * fix pdebuild-internal, pass --uid/--gid options.
> diff -Nru --exclude pbuilder-doc.html /tmp/lJIc1Y81Rq/pbuilder-0.152/pbuilder-satisfydepends /tmp/H2m1HBzCBJ/pbuilder-0.152/pbuilder-satisfydepends
> --- /tmp/lJIc1Y81Rq/pbuilder-0.152/pbuilder-satisfydepends	2006-03-31 02:14:31.000000000 +0200
> +++ /tmp/H2m1HBzCBJ/pbuilder-0.152/pbuilder-satisfydepends	2006-05-13 14:46:52.000000000 +0200
> @@ -40,16 +40,29 @@
>      return 1;
>  }
>  
> +function expand_arch () {
> +    local ARCH="$1"
> +    local EXPANDED_ARCH
> +    if echo "$ARCH" | grep "-" > /dev/null; then
> +        EXPANDED_ARCH=$ARCH
> +    else
> +        EXPANDED_ARCH="linux-$ARCH"
> +    fi
> +    local WC1=$(echo $EXPANDED_ARCH | sed 's/^[^-]*/any/')
> +    local WC2=$(echo $EXPANDED_ARCH | sed 's/[^-]*$/any/')
> +    echo "$ARCH\\|$EXPANDED_ARCH\\|$WC1\\|$WC2"
> +}
> +
>  function checkbuilddep_archdeps () {
>      # returns FALSE on INSTALL
>      local INSTALLPKG="$1"
>      local ARCH="$2"
> -    if echo "$INSTALLPKG" | sed 's/.*\(\[.*\]\)/\1/' | grep "[[/][!]$ARCH[]/]" > /dev/null; then
> +    if echo "$INSTALLPKG" | sed 's/.*\(\[.*\]\)/\1/' | grep "[[/][!]\($(expand_arch $ARCH)\)[]/]" > /dev/null; then
>  	# if !$ARCH exists in there, ERROR.
>  	return 0;
>      fi
>      if ! echo "$INSTALLPKG" | sed 's/.*\(\[.*\]\)/\1/' | grep "[!]" > /dev/null; then
> -	if ! echo "$INSTALLPKG" | sed 's/.*\(\[.*\]\)/\1/' | grep "[[/]$ARCH[]/]" > /dev/null; then
> +	if ! echo "$INSTALLPKG" | sed 's/.*\(\[.*\]\)/\1/' | grep "[[/]\($(expand_arch $ARCH)\)[]/]" > /dev/null; then
>  	# if $ARCH does not exist, ERROR.
>  	    return 0;
>  	fi

Message #47 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Cc: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 21:47:15 +0200

Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Have you actually tested this patch?

Yes.

> ARCH is the current running architecture, which won't be linux-any
> etc.

I don't understand what that has to do with anything.

Message #52 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

Subject: Re: Bug#363193: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:41:06 +0900

At Mon, 15 May 2006 03:08:31 +0900,
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Have you actually tested this patch?
> 
> ARCH is the current running architecture, which won't be linux-any etc.
> 
> regards,
> 	junichi
> 

[09:36:45]ibookg4:tmp> /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends --echo
 -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.24 2006/03/31 00:14:31 dancer Exp $
 -> Considering  libasound2 [linux-any]
   -> This package is not for this architecture
 -> Installing
apt-get -y --force-yes install
 -> Finished parsing the build-deps
[09:36:50]ibookg4:tmp> /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends --echo
 -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.25 2006/05/14 18:32:32 dancer Exp $
 -> Considering  libasound2 [linux-any]
   -> Trying libasound2
 -> Installing  libasound2
apt-get -y --force-yes install libasound2
 -> Finished parsing the build-deps


tested locally, it seems to be functioning fine, cool.
Applied.



regards,
	junichi

Message #57 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org

Cc: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#363193: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:46:49 +0900

Hi,

I was discussing with Christian Perrier at dinner and he mentioned
that the new-style architecture specifications (Build-Depends: XXX
[linux-any] etc.) may have been reverted.  I'm not quite sure about
that since the documentation and changelogs are quite scarse about
dpkg-dev stuff.

Am I okay in going ahead with committing this change to pbuilder ?


I am personally against supporting new debian/control construct to
pbuilder before the next stable release with dpkg supporting that
contstruct, but if there is need within Debian archive, I would add
this feature.



regards,
	junichi



At Mon, 15 May 2006 09:41:06 +0900,
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> 
> At Mon, 15 May 2006 03:08:31 +0900,
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Have you actually tested this patch?
> > 
> > ARCH is the current running architecture, which won't be linux-any etc.
> > 
> > regards,
> > 	junichi
> > 
> 
> [09:36:45]ibookg4:tmp> /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends --echo
>  -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.24 2006/03/31 00:14:31 dancer Exp $
>  -> Considering  libasound2 [linux-any]
>    -> This package is not for this architecture
>  -> Installing
> apt-get -y --force-yes install
>  -> Finished parsing the build-deps
> [09:36:50]ibookg4:tmp> /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends --echo
>  -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.25 2006/05/14 18:32:32 dancer Exp $
>  -> Considering  libasound2 [linux-any]
>    -> Trying libasound2
>  -> Installing  libasound2
> apt-get -y --force-yes install libasound2
>  -> Finished parsing the build-deps
> 
> 
> tested locally, it seems to be functioning fine, cool.
> Applied.
> 
> 
> 
> regards,
> 	junichi
> 

Message #62 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>

To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Cc: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, 363193@bugs.debian.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

Subject: Re: Bug#363193: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 03:39:24 -0500

On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:46:49PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I was discussing with Christian Perrier at dinner and he mentioned
> that the new-style architecture specifications (Build-Depends: XXX
> [linux-any] etc.) may have been reverted.  I'm not quite sure about
> that since the documentation and changelogs are quite scarse about
> dpkg-dev stuff.
> 
> Am I okay in going ahead with committing this change to pbuilder ?

Guillem, could you please answer this question? It is your code
after all and so you can probably answer it more effectly than me...

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Message #69 received at 363193-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>

To: 363193-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#363193: fixed in pbuilder 0.153

Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:47:12 -0700

Source: pbuilder
Source-Version: 0.153

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pbuilder, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pbuilder_0.153.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.153.dsc
pbuilder_0.153.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.153.tar.gz
pbuilder_0.153_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.153_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 363193@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org> (supplier of updated pbuilder package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 06:30:13 +0900
Source: pbuilder
Binary: pbuilder
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.153
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian pbuilder maintenance team <pbuilder-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>
Description: 
 pbuilder   - personal package builder for Debian packages
Closes: 363193 367133
Changes: 
 pbuilder (0.153) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [Junichi Uekawa]
   * fix pdebuild --help output (closes: #367133)
   * Support for new style architecture specifications (closes: #363193)
     Thanks to Peter Eisentraut for patch.
     The support is currently disabled, until dpkg maintainers clarify the
     situation.
   * pbuilder-doc.xml: update documentation to add an example snippet for
     using locally built packages from pbuilder.
     And other minor updates, including spellchecking.
   * manpages: spellcheck.
   * cowdancer support, pbuilder support cowbuilder.
   * quiet down cowprotect message.
Files: 
 ecca37bdcc03a527786ff3f5911b4467 675 devel extra pbuilder_0.153.dsc
 db9e5015020cce8d0eaef966068df8c0 412592 devel extra pbuilder_0.153.tar.gz
 b3df87b9e2c9622bb32c714c09bd3293 77660 devel extra pbuilder_0.153_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEdiPx2Dd9TugeVcERAuNdAJ93NprXbGeC0lXaW3+UdR5wbC1dtwCfQqgO
wn8wxulmCZTkhhAlYe8h5Ps=
=kvrn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #74 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Not done yet

Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:52:44 +0200

reopen 363193
stop

I appreciate your concerns, but until this actually works, this bug is 
not closed.

Message #81 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: Not done yet

Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:01:17 +0900

close 363193
stop

shut up.

Message #86 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: Not done yet

Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:05:08 +0900

reopen 363193
retitle 363193 waiting for dpkg maintainer to respond and document: support for *-* type Build-Depends.
severity 363193 wishlist
stop


> 
> I appreciate your concerns, but until this actually works, this bug is 
> not closed.


retitled accordingly.

Message #91 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, 363193@bugs.debian.org,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>

Subject: is dpkg new architecture specifications going to be fixed and documented?

Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:14:28 +0900

Hi Guillem, what's up ?

http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2006/05/msg00056.html




regards,
	junichi
-- 
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project

quote:


On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:46:49PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I was discussing with Christian Perrier at dinner and he mentioned
> that the new-style architecture specifications (Build-Depends: XXX
> [linux-any] etc.) may have been reverted.  I'm not quite sure about
> that since the documentation and changelogs are quite scarse about
> dpkg-dev stuff.
> 
> Am I okay in going ahead with committing this change to pbuilder ?

Guillem, could you please answer this question? It is your code
after all and so you can probably answer it more effectly than me...

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Message #96 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Cc: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: Not done yet

Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 01:17:07 +0200

Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> close 363193
> stop
>
> shut up.

Could you please have the courtesy of explaining how you intend to 
handle this issue?  Since you included my patch, you apparently thought 
the issue has merit.  If you close the bug, then you indicate that you 
have dealt with the issue, but that is not the case.  If you don't 
think the issue has merit, please revert my patch and close the bug.  
Then we will wait until the dpkg guys have their act together and the 
architecture specification is in the policy (or not; whatever happens).  
If you think that the issue has merit but you don't like to fix it, tag 
the bug wontfix and/or put a blocker on it.  But the current state is 
confusing.

Message #109 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: Not done yet

Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:20:27 +0900

clone 363193 -1
reassign -1 dpkg
retitle -1 document wildcards in arch-specific Build-Depends specification.
block 363193 by -1
thanks

actually, this is better.



regards,
	junichi

-- 
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project

Message #118 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>

To: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Cc: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, 363193@bugs.debian.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

Subject: Re: is dpkg new architecture specifications going to be fixed and documented?

Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:12:00 +0300

On Thu, 18 May 2006 03:39:24 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:46:49PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I was discussing with Christian Perrier at dinner and he mentioned
> > that the new-style architecture specifications (Build-Depends: XXX
> > [linux-any] etc.) may have been reverted.  I'm not quite sure about
> > that since the documentation and changelogs are quite scarse about
> > dpkg-dev stuff.
> > 
> > Am I okay in going ahead with committing this change to pbuilder ?

Please use instead dpkg-architecture -e or -i options (documented in
the man page), so that we have this code centralized there, and can
extend or fix it in just one place.

You'll have to depend on a new enough version of dpkg (1.13.17) or
conditionally use the feature if that dpkg version is present.

About the bug report, if you find the documentation lacking in
dpkg-architecture's man page I can extend it, otherwise please
close it.

regards,
guillem

Message #125 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>, debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, 363193@bugs.debian.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

Subject: Re: is dpkg new architecture specifications going to be fixed and documented?

Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:18:34 +0900

Hi,


> You'll have to depend on a new enough version of dpkg (1.13.17) or
> conditionally use the feature if that dpkg version is present.

This information belongs to BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY section of the
manpage.

regards,
	junichi
-- 
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project

Message #130 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:18:51 +0200

Could this be addressed for lenny?  The dpkg maintainers claim that the 
documentation has been fixed.

Message #135 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:21:35 +0900

Hi,

> Could this be addressed for lenny?  The dpkg maintainers claim that the 
> documentation has been fixed.

I assume pbuilder doesn't yet support any of it, and the code required
to implement it requires to be re-written for dpkg-architecture -e and
-a.



regards,	
	junichi
-- 
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project

Message #140 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: New patch for wildcard architecture specifications

Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:36:49 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Back to this issue.  dpkg has supported the build dependency style [linux-any] 
or [linux-any hurd-any] etc. since etch, so it should be safe to use it.

We were earlier confused by the unclear documentation, but 
dpkg-architecture(1) now has nice examples:

       Check if the current architecture or an architecture provided with -a
       are Linux systems:

              dpkg-architecture -ilinux-any

              dpkg-architecture -ai386 -ilinux-any

With that in mind, I propose the attached patch.  It looks simple enough.  
Apparently the old regular expression supports architectures separated by 
slashes (/)?  I don't find this documented anywhere, but you can continue to 
support that if you split up $DEP_ARCHES beforehand.

As a test case, I used pgpool, replaced libpam-dev by libpam-dev [linux-any 
hurd-any] and could build successfully.  Yay! :)

[pbuilder-363193.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Message #145 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Peter Eisentraut <petere@debian.org>

To: control@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: retitle 363193 to pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:01:45 +0200

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
# back to old title after dpkg docs have been updated
retitle 363193 pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Message #154 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andres Mejia <mcitadel@gmail.com>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: [PATCH] pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 01:16:25 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Here's new patches to support architecture wildcards in pbuilder. The first patch 
provides changes to how package interrelationships are handled. The second patch 
adds support for checking the 'Architecture' field to see whether or not to build 
a package. This kind of check is supported in sbuild.

Both patches are modeled closely to how architecture wildcard support is 
implemented in sbuild. See bug #501230.

-- 
Regards,
Andres

[arch-wildcard-part1.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[arch-wildcard-part2.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #159 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andres Mejia <mcitadel@gmail.com>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: [PATCH] Bug #363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:35:01 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Fixed a problem with the second patch. I forgot the case where only arch 'all' 
packages were being built.

I've attached both patches again. I've tested these and they match the 
implementation used in sbuild.

-- 
Regards,
Andres

[arch-wildcard-part1.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[arch-wildcard-part2.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #164 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

To: Andres Mejia <mcitadel@gmail.com>, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#363193: [PATCH] Bug #363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:55:10 +0900

Hi,

Do you have handy testcases I could try?


At Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:35:01 -0400,
Andres Mejia wrote:
> 
> diff --git a/pbuilder-buildpackage b/pbuilder-buildpackage
> index 0fbaf2e..cde3551 100755
> --- a/pbuilder-buildpackage
> +++ b/pbuilder-buildpackage
> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ if [ ! -f "$PACKAGENAME" ]; then
>      exit 1;
>  fi;
>  
> +# check if this package should be built at all
> +checkarchitecture "$PACKAGENAME"
> +
>  if [ -n "$BUILDUSERNAME" -a -n "$BUILDUSERID" ]; then
>      SUTOUSER="env LOGNAME=$BUILDUSERNAME su -p $BUILDUSERNAME"
>      DEBBUILDOPTS="$DEBBUILDOPTS -rfakeroot"
> diff --git a/pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs b/pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs
> index 370c799..d573dbf 100644
> --- a/pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs
> +++ b/pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs
> @@ -30,6 +30,25 @@ function copydsc () {
>      done
>  }
>  
> +function checkarchitecture () {
> +    local DSCFILE="$1"
> +    local ARCHES="$(cat $DSCFILE | grep Architecture | sed 's/^[^:]\+:\s*//')"
> +    local ARCH=$(dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)
> +    local VALID_ARCH
> +    for d in $ARCHES; do
> +        if dpkg-architecture -a$ARCH -i$d; then
> +            VALID_ARCH="yes"
> +            break
> +        fi
> +    done
> +    if [ ! $VALID_ARCH ] && [ ! "$ARCHES" = "all" ]; then
> +        local msg="E: $ARCH not in arch list or does not match any "
> +        msg="$msg arch wildcards: $ARCHES"
> +        log $msg
> +        exit 2
> +    fi
> +}
> +
>  function checkbuilddep () {
>      # call satisfydepends
>      local BUILDOPT="--binary-all"

Message #169 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andres Mejia <mcitadel@gmail.com>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#363193: [PATCH] Bug #363193: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:57:53 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sunday 12 July 2009 19:55:10 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you have handy testcases I could try?

I've attached the tarball for a test native package. Should only attempt to 
build on i386 or amd64 systems. It uses build-depends of hurd-dev only on hurd 
systems, nasm for i386 and amd64, kfreebsd-kernel-headers on systems except for 
linux and hurd, and libqemu-dev on systems except for i386 and amd64.

-- 
Regards,
Andres

[test-dummy_0.1.tar.gz (application/x-compressed-tar, attachment)]

Message #174 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Darren Salt <linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:48:22 +0000

I've just tested with gxine (which now uses libgudev where available). Looks
like those patches are working properly (or sufficiently so for my purposes)
:-)

-- 
| Darren Salt            | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Doon
| using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds    ,demon,co,uk    | Northumberland | Army
| + http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/ & http://tartarus.org/ds/

This message was brought to you using only 100% recycled electrons.

Message #179 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: any progress?

Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:49:52 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

severity 363193 important
thanks

Hi,

this bug is over 4 years old. Is there any progress?
Given, that architecture wildcards are now allowed by the Debian policy, I've
bumped the severity to important.
I can confirm that the patches in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363193#159
work for me (you can try the avahi 0.6.26-1 package from unstable).

As pbuilder is my main tool for building packages in a clean chroot, I'd
appreciate a quick fix.

Thanks for considering,

Michael
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #186 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Schepler <dschepler@gmail.com>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Andres Mejia <mcitadel@gmail.com>

Subject: Minor issue with pbuilder dpkg-architecture patch

Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 13:58:40 -0700

The second part of the patch you supplied in <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363193#159> doesn't look quite right to me.  It seems 
like it will refuse to build packages like acpi-support which has
  Architecture: all i386 amd64 ia64
on architectures other than the ones explicitly listed there, while the intent 
is that it should be able to build the arch-indep packages on any 
architecture.
-- 
Daniel Schepler

Message #191 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Schepler <dschepler@gmail.com>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Andres Mejia <mcitadel@gmail.com>

Subject: Issue with pbuilder dpkg-architecture patch

Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:36:11 -0700

I just tried applying the first part of the patch submitted for the bug.  It 
looks like it doesn't work right with PBUILDERSATISFYDEPENDSCMD set to 
/usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends-classic (which I need because the 
aptitude version doesn't really support --preserve-buildplace, which my 
pbuildd script needs to skip past currently unbuildable packages quickly).  
For example, trying to build cowdancer on amd64 I got:

 -> Attempting to parse the build-deps 
 -> Considering build-depdebhelper (>> 4.0.0)
   -> Trying debhelper
 -> Considering build-deppbuilder
   -> Trying pbuilder
 -> Considering build-depqemu [i386 amd64 powerpc]
   -> This package is not for this architecture
 -> Considering build-deplibklibc-dev
   -> Trying libklibc-dev
 -> Considering build-depklibc-utils
   -> Trying klibc-utils
 -> Considering build-depcpio
   -> Trying cpio
 -> Considering build-depbusybox-static
   -> Trying busybox-static
 -> Installing  debhelper pbuilder libklibc-dev klibc-utils cpio busybox-
static
...
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: qemu
dpkg-buildpackage: warning: Build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied; aborting.
dpkg-buildpackage: warning: (Use -d flag to override.)
E: Failed autobuilding of package

It does look like the patch works right with pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude.
-- 
Daniel Schepler

Message #196 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andres Mejia <mcitadel@gmail.com>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#363193: Minor issue with pbuilder dpkg-architecture patch

Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:56:49 -0400

On Friday 09 July 2010 16:58:40 Daniel Schepler wrote:
> The second part of the patch you supplied in <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
> bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363193#159> doesn't look quite right to me.  It seems
> like it will refuse to build packages like acpi-support which has
>   Architecture: all i386 amd64 ia64
> on architectures other than the ones explicitly listed there, while the
> intent is that it should be able to build the arch-indep packages on any
> architecture.

The intent of the second patch was to fix issue where source packages that 
build architecture "all" packages would not build, though they should still 
build. If they don't build, then another patch needs to be submitted.

I don't use pbuilder anymore so feel free to submit new patches.

-- 
Regards,
Andres Mejia

Message #201 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org

Subject: cowbuilder vs. architecture wildcards

Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:01:20 +0000 (UTC)

found 363193 pbuilder/0.199
thanks

glib2.0_2.24.2-1.dsc (emphasis mine):
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.22), pkg-config (>= 0.14.0), gettext,
  autotools-dev, gnome-pkg-tools (>= 0.11), quilt, dpkg-dev (>= 1.14.13),
  libpcre3-dev (>= 7.4-1~), desktop-file-utils, gtk-doc-tools,
  libselinux1-dev [linux-any], linux-libc-dev [linux-any],
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  libgamin-dev [!linux-any] | libfam-dev [!linux-any], zlib1g-dev
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

cowbuilder:
 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy:
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on debhelper (>> 5.0.22); however:
   Package debhelper is not installed.
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on pkg-config (>= 0.14.0); however:
   Package pkg-config is not installed.
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on gettext; however:
   Package gettext is not installed.
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on autotools-dev; however:
   Package autotools-dev is not installed.
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on gnome-pkg-tools (>= 0.11); however:
   Package gnome-pkg-tools is not installed.
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on quilt; however:
   Package quilt is not installed.
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on libpcre3-dev (>= 7.4-1~); however:
   Package libpcre3-dev is not installed.
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on desktop-file-utils; however:
   Package desktop-file-utils is not installed.
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on gtk-doc-tools; however:
   Package gtk-doc-tools is not installed.
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on libgamin-dev | libfam-dev; however:
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   Package libgamin-dev is not installed.
   Package libfam-dev is not installed.
  pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on zlib1g-dev; however:
   Package zlib1g-dev is not installed.
 dpkg: error processing pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy (--install):
  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

As you can see, this leads to quite interesting problems building
packages which doesn’t work for me (m68k currently has too much of
the archive uninstallable to use buildd so I’m needing cowbuilder
to do that job). Please do fix this.

I’m using dpkg 1.15.5.6, because newer dpkg needs newer gettext
which needs newer libxml2 and glib2.0 which I’m tring to build
at the moment, but dpkg-architecture is there, and the feature
is said to have been there since etch, so…

Thanks in advance,
//mirabilos
-- 
  "Using Lynx is like wearing a really good pair of shades: cuts out
   the glare and harmful UV (ultra-vanity), and you feel so-o-o COOL."
                                         -- Henry Nelson, March 1999

Message #212 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: pbuilder: support new-style architecture specifications

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:32:23 +1100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

usertags 363193 patch-in-git
usertags 363193 patch-supplied
thanks

Well, this has turned into a monster of a bug, with several subtly different
issues being raised and debated.  Here's the ones that I've found and
addressed in the attached patch series (which might be more easily accessed
via the 363193 branch of git://github.com/mpalmer/pbuilder):

1) Support for wildcard arch specifications, such as "linux-any"

   The main, initial bug report.  The patches provided by Andres Mejia in
   message #159 were the basis for this patch series (credited as
   appropriate), with modifications as needed for the other issues herein.

2) Testcases (message #164)

   Whilst I wasn't able to get full test coverage, I did add test coverage
   for checkbuilddep_archdeps (testing arch-specific package dependencies)
   and checkarchitecture (validating whether a particular package should be
   built on a given architecture).
 
3) Support for (eg) Architecture: all i386 amd64 ia64  (message #186)

   Policy states that this form of architecture list is valid for .dsc files
   only (not debian/control), and so the checkarchitecture function needed
   some mangling to work properly.

4) pbuilder-satisfydepends-classic didn't handle arch wildcards (message
   #191)

   This was something of a corner case in the -classic code, as it didn't
   provide valid "package [arch]" stanzas to checkbuilddep_archdeps, but
   instead replaced spaces with slashes.

Hopefully which patch(es) in the series cover each of the above issues
should be clear enough; if not, I'm happy to clarify.

- Matt

[0001-Apply-arch-wildcard-part1.patch.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[0002-Add-a-little-more-verbosity-to-test-runs.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[0003-Add-test-cases-for-checkbuilddep_archdeps.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[0004-Fix-a-tiny-aesthetic-nit-in-pbuilder-satisfydepends.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[0005-Fix-pbuilder-satisfydepends-classic-for-arch-selecto.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[0006-Apply-arch-wildcard-part2.patch.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[0007-Check-correct-architecture-for-checkarchitecture-an.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[0008-Make-checkarchitecture-even-more-testable.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[0009-Testsuite-for-checkarchitecture-and-adjustments-to.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Message #217 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>

To: 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Additional patch

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:49:49 +1100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

This patch fixes things so that the test suite passes when being run during
the build process (and only the build process).  It's needed in addition to
the previous 9 (and is in my git branch).

- Matt

[0010-Switch-all-dpkg-architecture-calls-to-include-f.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Message #222 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: bertagaz <bertagaz@ptitcanardnoir.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <363193@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: does not support new style architecture specifications

Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 17:05:18 +0100

Hi,

Just tried to build dpkg from sid, which has a linux-any build dep, using
a pbuilder build from mpalmer's branch 363193 and it worked like a charm.
Should be merged ASAP.

Thanks

bert.

Message #227 received at 363193@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>

To: 606699@bugs.debian.org, 363193@bugs.debian.org

Subject: pbuilder NMU

Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:29:19 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

I talked to Junichi and he told me it was fine if I NMU'ed pbuilder to fix these
bugs. This is the debdiff for my NMU.

Regards,
Emilio

[pbuilder.debdiff (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #232 received at 363193-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>

To: 363193-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#363193: fixed in pbuilder 0.199+nmu2

Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:33:27 +0000

Source: pbuilder
Source-Version: 0.199+nmu2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pbuilder, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pbuilder-uml_0.199+nmu2_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder-uml_0.199+nmu2_amd64.deb
pbuilder_0.199+nmu2.dsc
  to main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.199+nmu2.dsc
pbuilder_0.199+nmu2.tar.gz
  to main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.199+nmu2.tar.gz
pbuilder_0.199+nmu2_all.deb
  to main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.199+nmu2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 363193@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> (supplier of updated pbuilder package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:02:34 +0000
Source: pbuilder
Binary: pbuilder pbuilder-uml
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.199+nmu2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian pbuilder maintenance team <pbuilder-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Description: 
 pbuilder   - personal package builder for Debian packages
 pbuilder-uml - user-mode-linux version of pbuilder
Closes: 363193 606699
Changes: 
 pbuilder (0.199+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload with maintainer's permission.
   * pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude: Resolve packages from experimental
     when necessary. Logic stolen from sbuild. Closes: #606699.
   * pbuilder-buildpackage, pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs: Handle
     architecture wildcards properly. Patch from Andres Mejia.
     Closes: #363193.
   * Makefile: Don't require a UTF-8 encoding to check the manpages.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 68b4acea2d130f2bf13e6c31f27c4c8ed06558e4 1164 pbuilder_0.199+nmu2.dsc
 afab64d1eea39503497c947bef98bac68411fa67 857078 pbuilder_0.199+nmu2.tar.gz
 21b7e7c5e3fbfc62b2284b82dd2901c9b4ed976a 361250 pbuilder_0.199+nmu2_all.deb
 591375c49f0d742171885f9860e9ea064d13863e 41126 pbuilder-uml_0.199+nmu2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 d0f561c63659333daa49d2b13ebe2e652ff4aa86999d676458460a0ddcec7707 1164 pbuilder_0.199+nmu2.dsc
 f43b71b0d5f9f86526210896f75d123478fbec943e87cf054c186579b73b00e0 857078 pbuilder_0.199+nmu2.tar.gz
 2ef7b4ee7f65d5e2f20194dc0e48376d88f48feb8a27ce6b33d41e3ff39efec9 361250 pbuilder_0.199+nmu2_all.deb
 83ce0ddcc7e7e6518ab824c9122bdb176e4b08f608eeff450a1935a43165a9ca 41126 pbuilder-uml_0.199+nmu2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 b73a3b34933c70eb269b63e7ff07a634 1164 devel extra pbuilder_0.199+nmu2.dsc
 87d4dc26f4551162c1b478f0e633ffca 857078 devel extra pbuilder_0.199+nmu2.tar.gz
 f763dd6d356f29f6f4bd63f942463b9a 361250 devel extra pbuilder_0.199+nmu2_all.deb
 dd72a81085fc2ec554d6c1c3fbeb51e2 41126 devel extra pbuilder-uml_0.199+nmu2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk1gFtIACgkQhTV17EoIsv5NWQCcCeONLsDIwoU0ZgNMXK70pK6J
5rQAnijWcnNIjUV0+/mWItop4d5fq/tM
=ZWch
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.