Debian Bug report logs - #331112
O: gal -- G App Libs

Package: wnpp; Maintainer for wnpp is wnpp@debian.org;

Reported by: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>

Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:03:07 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>:
Bug#331112; Package wnpp. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: O: libgal19
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:52:41 +0200
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

        Hi,

 After some checks with the pkg-gnome maintainers and after the
 confirmation of Takuo KITAME, and following the discussions in
 debian-gtk-gnome and debian-release concerning the status of GNOME 1,
 I'm orphaning a couple of GNOME 1 packages.

 If you're interested in adopting this package, please take contact with
 Thomas Bushnell (which is in copy) since he suggested he might adopt
 the packages.

   Bye,

-- 
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>



Changed Bug title. Request was from Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>:
Bug#331112; Package wnpp. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #12 received at 331112@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
To: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Cc: 331112@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#331112: O: libgal19
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 09:49:57 -0700
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org> writes:

>
>  After some checks with the pkg-gnome maintainers and after the
>  confirmation of Takuo KITAME, and following the discussions in
>  debian-gtk-gnome and debian-release concerning the status of GNOME 1,
>  I'm orphaning a couple of GNOME 1 packages.
>
>  If you're interested in adopting this package, please take contact with
>  Thomas Bushnell (which is in copy) since he suggested he might adopt
>  the packages.

I'm not adopting gal, because I've already created gal0.x, which is
uploaded and in the archive, and contains what used to be called
"gal".

Takuo KITAME refused to allow me to adopt gal only a short time ago,
and we agreed on this strategy, because he intended that the "gal"
source package would have the latest gal version.

So you and he should decide what you actually want, but regardless,
packaging of the legacy gal (providing the libgal-dev, libgal-data,
and libgal23 binary packages) is now in gal0.x.

Thomas



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>:
Bug#331112; Package wnpp. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to <wnpp@debian.org>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 331112@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
To: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Cc: 331112@bugs.debian.org, kitame@debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#331112: O: libgal19 [IMPORTANT]
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 19:16:22 +0200
        Hi,

On Sat, Oct 01, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I'm not adopting gal, because I've already created gal0.x, which is
> uploaded and in the archive, and contains what used to be called
> "gal".

 Ah!

> Takuo KITAME refused to allow me to adopt gal only a short time ago,
> and we agreed on this strategy, because he intended that the "gal"
> source package would have the latest gal version.

 Ok.  Takuo KITAME: could you please tell me whether you want the
 removal of the gal source package from the archive or whether you want
 to upload something new with it?  I see you already uploaded gal2.6 (it
 sits in NEW).

   Bye,

-- 
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>



Changed Bug title. Request was from Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Reply sent to Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #24 received at 331112-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 331112-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: gal removed
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 11:31:11 +0200
[Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:31:06 -0700] [ftpmaster: Ryan Murray]
Removed the following packages from unstable:

       gal |   0.24-1.5 | source

------------------- Reason -------------------
[rene] obsolete source package
----------------------------------------------



Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 17 Jun 2007 14:27:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Sat Apr 19 07:14:09 2014; Machine Name: beach.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.