Debian Bug report logs - #313579
please provide amule.schemas file for gconf (teaches browsers about ed2k:// links)

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: handle ed2k links

Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:45:08 +0200

Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.4-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297645

"ed2k" is a wrapper for ed2k links provided by most (all?) edonkey2000
protocol implementations.

--- mozilla-firefox-1.0.4.old/browser/app/profile/firefox.js    2005-06-14 14:20:41.000000000 +0200
+++ mozilla-firefox-1.0.4/browser/app/profile/firefox.js        2005-06-14 14:27:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -309,6 +309,11 @@
 pref("network.protocol-handler.expose.snews", false);
 pref("network.protocol-handler.expose.nntp", false);
 
+// "ed2k" is a wrapper for ed2k links provided by most (all?) edonkey2000
+// protocol implementations
+pref("network.protocol-handler.app.ed2k", "ed2k");
+pref("network.protocol-handler.warn-external.ed2k", false);
+
 // Default security warning dialogs to show once.
 pref("security.warn_entering_secure.show_once", true);
 pref("security.warn_entering_weak.show_once", true);


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on:
ii  debianutils              2.13.2          Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  fontconfig               2.3.2-1         generic font configuration library
ii  libatk1.0-0              1.8.0-4         The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6                    2.3.2.ds1-22    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1           2.3.2-1         generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6             2.1.7-2.4       FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1                  1:3.4.3-13      GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0             2.6.4-1         The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0              2.6.4-3         The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libidl0                  0.8.5-1         library for parsing CORBA IDL file
ii  libjpeg62                6b-10           The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libkrb53                 1.3.6-3         MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libpango1.0-0            1.8.1-1         Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpng12-0               1.2.8rel-1      PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++5               1:3.3.6-5       The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6                 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6                 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2                  2.1.7-1         FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxp6                   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxt6                   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  psmisc                   21.6-1          Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii  xlibs                    4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g                   1:1.2.2-4       compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

Message #10 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Eric Dorland <eric@debian.org>

To: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>, 313579@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#313579: handle ed2k links

Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 19:44:07 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

forwarded 313579 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297645
thanks

I'm going to let upstream make the call on this one.

* Robert Millan (rmh@debian.org) wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.4-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> 
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297645
> 
> "ed2k" is a wrapper for ed2k links provided by most (all?) edonkey2000
> protocol implementations.
> 
> --- mozilla-firefox-1.0.4.old/browser/app/profile/firefox.js    2005-06-14 14:20:41.000000000 +0200
> +++ mozilla-firefox-1.0.4/browser/app/profile/firefox.js        2005-06-14 14:27:06.000000000 +0200
> @@ -309,6 +309,11 @@
>  pref("network.protocol-handler.expose.snews", false);
>  pref("network.protocol-handler.expose.nntp", false);
>  
> +// "ed2k" is a wrapper for ed2k links provided by most (all?) edonkey2000
> +// protocol implementations
> +pref("network.protocol-handler.app.ed2k", "ed2k");
> +pref("network.protocol-handler.warn-external.ed2k", false);
> +
>  // Default security warning dialogs to show once.
>  pref("security.warn_entering_secure.show_once", true);
>  pref("security.warn_entering_weak.show_once", true);

-- 
Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C  2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ 
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ 
G e h! r- y+ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #21 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>

To: 313579@bugs.debian.org

Subject: ed2k links

Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 20:44:04 +0200

Upstream has been ignoring this since 2005.  I just pinged them.

Anyway, you think my patch could make it to the debian package?

-- 
Robert Millan

My spam trap is honeypot@aybabtu.com.  Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters.  Writing to it will get you added to my black list.

Message #24 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>

To: 313579@bugs.debian.org

Cc: pkg-mozilla-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Subject: ed2k links

Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 20:52:06 +0200

[ forgot to CC mozilla-maintainers as asked ]

Upstream has been ignoring this since 2005.  I just pinged them.

Anyway, you think my patch could make it to the debian package?

-- 
Robert Millan

My spam trap is honeypot@aybabtu.com.  Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters.  Writing to it will get you added to my black list.

Message #29 received at 313579-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Lior Kaplan <kaplan@debian.org>

To: 313579-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 313579-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Debian Firefox/Iceweasel bug triage - bug #313579

Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:17:18 +0200

Dear Firefox/Iceweasel user,

Thanks for your interest in Firefox/Iceweasel and the bug report you have contributed.

Your bug report [0] was done for a version which isn't a part of debian anymore. Debian 4.0 (Etch) was released with version 2.0.0.3.

Please reproduce your bug on an updated version of Iceweasel and confirm it 
still exists, or close it as irrelevant for recent versions. 

If you don't know or are not sure how to update or close your bug report, 
please contact me directly, and I'll help you.

IMPORTANT: In any case, please provide version info, as we use it to determine 
the relevance of the bug.

As this bug is quite old, I intend to close it if you don't update your bug 
report in the next 6 weeks.

This is the time line for the old bugs cleanup:
1. October 1st - first notice.
2. October 15th - Second notice.
3. October 29th - Third notice.
4. November 12th - Closing the bug.

Please help the Firefox/Iceweasel maintainer to help you (:

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=313579

--
Lior Kaplan
kaplan@debian.org

Message #35 received at 313579-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>

To: Lior Kaplan <kaplan@debian.org>, 313579-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 313579-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#313579: Debian Firefox/Iceweasel bug triage - bug #313579

Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:41:23 +0200

On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 02:17:18PM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Dear Firefox/Iceweasel user,
> 
> Thanks for your interest in Firefox/Iceweasel and the bug report you have contributed.
> 
> Your bug report [0] was done for a version which isn't a part of debian anymore. Debian 4.0 (Etch) was released with version 2.0.0.3.
> 
> Please reproduce your bug on an updated version of Iceweasel and confirm it 
> still exists, or close it as irrelevant for recent versions. 

See:

  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297645

and my last mail to this bug.

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)

Message #45 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>

To: 313579@bugs.debian.org

Subject: network.protocol-handler.app.default = "xdg-open"

Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:05:43 +0200

retitle 313579 default handler for links using xdg-open (handle ed2k://, lastfm://, itsp://, peercast:// et al in one run)
thanks

Quoting what I just told upstream:

<quote>
Also noticed that support is missing for lasfm://, itsp://, peercast://, etc. 
Looks like everyone likes to come up with their own URL scheme.

Thinking about it (and considering how long it takes to get oneself heard ;-)),
maybe it's better if we solve all in one run.  There's already a program that
can handle them all: xdg-open, so why not offload the effort into it, sharing
it with other browsers and whatnot?

I propose:

pref("network.protocol-handler.app.default", "xdg-open");
</quote>

This boils down to a one-liner patch.  Please, consider appliing it to Debian
(upstream could have some reservations, since xdg-open is not available on all
platforms, but we IMHO shouldn't have any problem with it).

Thanks!

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)

Message #50 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>

To: 313579@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: network.protocol-handler.app.default = "xdg-open"

Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:39:14 +0200

Erm sorry, there's no such thing as "network.protocol-handler.app.default".  I
got confused with gconf schemas.

Which sounds like a solution can be provided this way (e.g. by shipping a
schemas file in amule et al).  I'll investigate.

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 07:05:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> retitle 313579 default handler for links using xdg-open (handle ed2k://, lastfm://, itsp://, peercast:// et al in one run)
> thanks
> 
> Quoting what I just told upstream:
> 
> <quote>
> Also noticed that support is missing for lasfm://, itsp://, peercast://, etc. 
> Looks like everyone likes to come up with their own URL scheme.
> 
> Thinking about it (and considering how long it takes to get oneself heard ;-)),
> maybe it's better if we solve all in one run.  There's already a program that
> can handle them all: xdg-open, so why not offload the effort into it, sharing
> it with other browsers and whatnot?
> 
> I propose:
> 
> pref("network.protocol-handler.app.default", "xdg-open");
> </quote>
> 
> This boils down to a one-liner patch.  Please, consider appliing it to Debian
> (upstream could have some reservations, since xdg-open is not available on all
> platforms, but we IMHO shouldn't have any problem with it).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Robert Millan
> 
> <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
> <DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
> (as seen on /.)

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)

Message #55 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>

To: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>, 313579@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#313579: network.protocol-handler.app.default = "xdg-open"

Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:08:53 +0200

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 07:39:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 
> Erm sorry, there's no such thing as "network.protocol-handler.app.default".  I
> got confused with gconf schemas.
> 
> Which sounds like a solution can be provided this way (e.g. by shipping a
> schemas file in amule et al).  I'll investigate.

You're right. As soon as these protocols are defined at gnome level,
they will just work with iceweasel (provided you have the
iceweasel-gnome-support package installed)

Mike

Message #58 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>

To: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>

Cc: 313579@bugs.debian.org, amule@packages.debian.org

Subject: teach browsers about ed2k:// links (Re: Bug#313579: network.protocol-handler.app.default = "xdg-open")

Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:23:37 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

retitle 313579 please provide amule.schemas file for gconf (teaches browsers about ed2k:// links)
reassign 313579 amule
thanks

Hi,

Please could you provide this amule.schemas in amule?  When you install it in
/usr/share/gconf/schemas, browsers under GNOME learn about the ed2k:// scheme
and how to handle it.

(I believe there's more magic involved in registering it, but debhelper seems to
take care about that, see rhythmbox postinst for an example)

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 08:08:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 07:39:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > 
> > Erm sorry, there's no such thing as "network.protocol-handler.app.default".  I
> > got confused with gconf schemas.
> > 
> > Which sounds like a solution can be provided this way (e.g. by shipping a
> > schemas file in amule et al).  I'll investigate.
> 
> You're right. As soon as these protocols are defined at gnome level,
> they will just work with iceweasel (provided you have the
> iceweasel-gnome-support package installed)
> 
> Mike
> 

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)

[amule.schemas (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #71 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>

To: 313579@bugs.debian.org, 418273@bugs.debian.org, 453331@bugs.debian.org

Subject: intent to NMU

Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:00:35 +0200

Hi!

I know you're currently focused on getting amule 2.2 into lenny, and intend
to look into these bugs by then.  However it isn't clear yet whether 2.2 will
make it to lenny or not.

Since I think these three bugs are highly significant (specially the last one)
to amule usability, if you don't rise any objection I intend to NMU amule 2.1
for them:

  #313579: please provide amule.schemas file for gconf (teaches browsers about ed2k:// links)

  #418273: please set a preview handler to something that is installed by default

  #453331: default nodes.dat URL is broken, please replace

Thanks

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What good is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)

Message #74 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>

To: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>

Cc: 453331@bugs.debian.org, 313579@bugs.debian.org, 418273@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#453331: intent to NMU

Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:44:48 +0200

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:38:53PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Robert Millan [Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:00:35 +0200]:
> 
> > Hi!
> 
> Hello Robert,
> 
> >   #453331: default nodes.dat URL is broken, please replace
> 
> I'm ok if you upload a NMU for this one, you're right lenny should not
> ship with that bug under any circumstance. If you could commit your
> changes into a separate branch in the collab-maint git repository,
> that'd be extra nice, but not strictly necessary.

Ok.  Since I don't hear any objections about #313579 and #418273, I assume
you're fine with the proposed fixes in these too.

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What good is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)

Message #79 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>

To: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>

Cc: 453331@bugs.debian.org, 313579@bugs.debian.org, 418273@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#453331: intent to NMU

Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:51:54 +0200

* Robert Millan [Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:44:48 +0200]:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:38:53PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Robert Millan [Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:00:35 +0200]:

> > >   #453331: default nodes.dat URL is broken, please replace

> > I'm ok if you upload a NMU for this one, you're right lenny should not
> > ship with that bug under any circumstance. If you could commit your
> > changes into a separate branch in the collab-maint git repository,
> > that'd be extra nice, but not strictly necessary.

> Ok.  Since I don't hear any objections about #313579 and #418273, I assume
> you're fine with the proposed fixes in these too.

You can't *possibly* be serious.

If I say "I'm ok if you upload a NMU for *this* one", I'm saying exactly
that, and not "I'm ok if you upload a NMU for this one and... oh, the
other two too".

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
La música es de los que la quieren escuchar y de nadie más.
                -- Andrés Calamaro

Message #82 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>

To: 313579@bugs.debian.org, 418273@bugs.debian.org, Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>

Subject: Re: Bug#453331: intent to NMU

Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:42:47 +0200

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:51:54PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> 
> > Ok.  Since I don't hear any objections about #313579 and #418273, I assume
> > you're fine with the proposed fixes in these too.
> 
> You can't *possibly* be serious.
> 
> If I say "I'm ok if you upload a NMU for *this* one", I'm saying exactly
> that, and not "I'm ok if you upload a NMU for this one and... oh, the
> other two too".

In that case, would you mind spending five minutes of your time to explain why?

AFAICS, both #313579 and #418273 are pretty straightforwarded and
non-disruptive.  If you have a valid reason please explain it.  If the reason
is just that you don't have time to look into it, I'm sorry but in that case
you should consider orphaning the package instead.

Thanks

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What good is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)

Message #87 received at 313579-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Vollstrecker <amule@vollstreckernet.de>

To: 313579-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Will be fixed somehow different.

Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:16:47 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

I'm closing this bug, because this won't get included upstream, and 
including it in debian would help users of firefoy/iceweasel and gnome. 
I expect right after including this, someone wants lynx to be patched 
for this, and someone wants a .desktop for kde and whatever else is 
imaginable. So I'm planning some kind of autoregister in the ed2k binary 
itself and this bug can be closed.

-- 
MfG usw.

Vollstrecker
registered Linuxuser: 295882

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #92 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <giuseppe@iuculano.it>

To: Vollstrecker <amule@vollstreckernet.de>, 313579@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pkg-amule-devel] Bug#313579: marked as done (please provide amule.schemas file for gconf (teaches browsers about ed2k:// links))

Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:25:43 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

reopen 313579
thanks

Hi,

Debian Bug Tracking System ha scritto:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm closing this bug, because this won't get included upstream, and 
> including it in debian would help users of firefoy/iceweasel and gnome. 
> I expect right after including this, someone wants lynx to be patched 
> for this, and someone wants a .desktop for kde and whatever else is 
> imaginable. So I'm planning some kind of autoregister in the ed2k binary 
> itself and this bug can be closed.


I disagree with this interpretation. If we can add a gnome support, we should do it.

Cheers,
Giuseppe.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #99 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Vollstrecker <amule@vollstreckernet.de>

To: 313579@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: reopen

Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:41:10 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

> If we can add a gnome support, we should do it.

And if we could add kde-support, we should do it? And if we could add 
opera-support, we should do it? We could add support for almost 
everything, but I as a user would be pissed if I would have to install 
support for a system I don't use, while the system I use could be easily 
supported, but isn't.

And think about multiuser machines, where one user wants to use ed2k-
links with aMule, while the other prefers mldonkey. The ml-user would be 
really pissed if he has to reconfigure something, because of an updated 
app of the other.

I'm wokring on a solution to let the ed2k-binary itself register in 
popular browser if the user tells him. This should work on a per user 
basis and should satisfy all concerns. Hence by now it's in an early 
state, but I'm not the slowest in doing such things.

-- 
MfG usw.

Vollstrecker
registered Linuxuser: 295882

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #104 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org>

To: amule@vollstreckernet.de, 313579@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pkg-amule-devel] Bug#313579: reopen

Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:35:29 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

Vollstrecker ha scritto:
>> If we can add a gnome support, we should do it.
> 
> And if we could add kde-support, we should do it? And if we could add 
> opera-support, we should do it?

Why not? :-)

> everything, but I as a user would be pissed if I would have to install 
> support for a system I don't use, while the system I use could be easily 
> supported, but isn't.

So we will add an amule-gnome-support package (Ubuntu already did this).
If the user needs that, he will install it.


Cheers,
Giuseppe

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #109 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Vollstrecker <amule@vollstreckernet.de>

To: Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org>, 313579@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#313579: [Pkg-amule-devel] Bug#313579: reopen

Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:59:37 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Am Dienstag 05 Januar 2010 schrieb Giuseppe Iuculano:

> > everything, but I as a user would be pissed if I would have to
> > install support for a system I don't use, while the system I use
> > could be easily supported, but isn't.
> 
> So we will add an amule-gnome-support package (Ubuntu already did
>  this). If the user needs that, he will install it.

So one package for one single small file? I got critized for spltting 
the translations and the utils into separate packages (which I have 
still reasons for). Where's the difference?

-- 
MfG usw.

Vollstrecker
registered Linuxuser: 295882

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #114 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org>

To: amule@vollstreckernet.de

Cc: 313579@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#313579: [Pkg-amule-devel] Bug#313579: reopen

Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:19:12 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Vollstrecker ha scritto:
> So one package for one single small file? I got critized for spltting 
> the translations and the utils into separate packages (which I have 
> still reasons for). Where's the difference?

I don't know why you got criticized, but there are many other packages that
provide gnome-support with few small files, see iceweasel-gnome-support,
xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support, icedove-gnome-support, etc.

Cheers,
Giuseppe.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #119 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Vollstrecker <amule@vollstreckernet.de>

To: Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org>, 313579@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#313579: [Pkg-amule-devel] Bug#313579: reopen

Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:29:29 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Am Mittwoch 06 Januar 2010 schrieb Giuseppe Iuculano:

> I don't know why you got criticized

For packages where payload and metainformation are nearly the same size. 
But that's another story.

> , but there are many other
>  packages that provide gnome-support with few small files, see
>  iceweasel-gnome-support, xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support,
>  icedove-gnome-support, etc.

I never said it's a bad idea. It's just that I don't like the way it 
should be solved. If we do it with a shemas-file, we get only some 
browsers, and we give a systemwide standard for a thing that users 
solved for agaes by themselfes on many different ways, which we don't 
know how, and which has alternative apps to handle. Like the mldonkey 
thing I mentioned. That's why you can't compare this with other gnome-
support addons that just print a download finished message in desktop's 
native style.

If you want to include such a thing, feel free to do so, I just suggest 
a different appraoch (and I am working in this, too).

-- 
MfG usw.

Vollstrecker
registered Linuxuser: 295882

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #124 received at 313579@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org>

To: 313579@bugs.debian.org,control@bugs.debian.org,313579-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: [3e1a262] Fix for Bug#313579 committed to git

Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:04:47 +0000

tags 313579 + pending
thanks

Hello,

     The following change has been committed for this bug by
 Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org> on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:02:48 +0100.
 The fix will be in the next upload. 
=========================================================================
Merge from Ubuntu: New amule-gnome-support package.

Closes: #313579
=========================================================================

You can check the diff of the fix at:

    http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-amule/amule.git;a=commitdiff;h=3e1a262

Message #134 received at 313579-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org>

To: 313579-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#313579: fixed in amule 2.2.6+debian0-7

Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:17:18 +0000

Source: amule
Source-Version: 2.2.6+debian0-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
amule, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

amule-common_2.2.6+debian0-7_all.deb
  to main/a/amule/amule-common_2.2.6+debian0-7_all.deb
amule-daemon_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
  to main/a/amule/amule-daemon_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
amule-gnome-support_2.2.6+debian0-7_all.deb
  to main/a/amule/amule-gnome-support_2.2.6+debian0-7_all.deb
amule-utils-gui_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
  to main/a/amule/amule-utils-gui_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
amule-utils_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
  to main/a/amule/amule-utils_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
amule_2.2.6+debian0-7.diff.gz
  to main/a/amule/amule_2.2.6+debian0-7.diff.gz
amule_2.2.6+debian0-7.dsc
  to main/a/amule/amule_2.2.6+debian0-7.dsc
amule_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
  to main/a/amule/amule_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 313579@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org> (supplier of updated amule package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:10:32 +0100
Source: amule
Binary: amule amule-common amule-utils amule-utils-gui amule-daemon amule-gnome-support
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.2.6+debian0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian aMule Team <pkg-amule-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org>
Description: 
 amule      - client for the eD2k and Kad networks, like eMule
 amule-common - common files for the rest of aMule packages
 amule-daemon - non-graphic version of aMule, a client for the eD2k and Kad netwo
 amule-gnome-support - ed2k links handling support for GNOME web browsers
 amule-utils - utilities for aMule (command-line version)
 amule-utils-gui - graphic utilities for aMule
Closes: 313579
Changes: 
 amule (2.2.6+debian0-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * [3e1a262] Merge from Ubuntu: New amule-gnome-support package.
     (Closes: #313579)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 66e04a951f3e7984dc49632c03ee99005892e4bf 1560 amule_2.2.6+debian0-7.dsc
 e73b154475c4add93e9c0b1250d43066333d9aa5 24621 amule_2.2.6+debian0-7.diff.gz
 9171446e3639d12725b72e1632f1fcf64e32d648 1862544 amule_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 18174552061307e8861172857c5ff215d3075e58 463184 amule-utils_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 d5200a2aaa15412352a8bdd969a417d6ed165725 1302376 amule-utils-gui_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 5b2a8bc590502b1eae36205ddfb654d432005d62 1201994 amule-daemon_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 31bfe4e3f8357694d9330179e83469e77be37490 2429946 amule-common_2.2.6+debian0-7_all.deb
 3d25b413136c4f3b8436c31ef4981f501673cc93 123236 amule-gnome-support_2.2.6+debian0-7_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 77567279a38881ce31ec9cc7ff9ad5c7336d0fd1fd3622f311a77b80732fd701 1560 amule_2.2.6+debian0-7.dsc
 1136112fb2fa9ef505c20c5c4cebeebe37d993c47bfeb70383658ac9c5ecaefa 24621 amule_2.2.6+debian0-7.diff.gz
 fe630def9ea03954c293809246700b799100eb00adacfd1e8bad87f52ce43324 1862544 amule_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 0b8a1c772bfdfe6fefc783fede992df5fb84c1f59cd7ff724d30483cd89df8d4 463184 amule-utils_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 e4cb69c1898f52ff71e822ddfb53be3d7f021d876f7f93ab7c6da852dad71c39 1302376 amule-utils-gui_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 a764abdbafa534c1fc5b5be8cc66439adb138ae23f31a7e09e3d0a4ccf854810 1201994 amule-daemon_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 bc443fadc77d149a390dd94e0652a8dd6659d8bd8710bfda7e745f62eca522bf 2429946 amule-common_2.2.6+debian0-7_all.deb
 d2b5d63ac163a58ccdfe500842fad88edcd0cee63aca2b37ad7e032540cc3f8f 123236 amule-gnome-support_2.2.6+debian0-7_all.deb
Files: 
 25517192e1669dc998dbb6a460dded09 1560 net optional amule_2.2.6+debian0-7.dsc
 ad1a7c672eb61898074b733b29ef96ab 24621 net optional amule_2.2.6+debian0-7.diff.gz
 00b9dd67a19e0e813d21b81493590277 1862544 net optional amule_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 5244aa32ae79342b61fad80c4e1a4775 463184 net optional amule-utils_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 cef42f1c39a2201764f4977b9c9a894d 1302376 net optional amule-utils-gui_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 54f33c07d50135ad05114980705d22c5 1201994 net optional amule-daemon_2.2.6+debian0-7_i386.deb
 0e892678c41fee6d0733c004d3e72306 2429946 net optional amule-common_2.2.6+debian0-7_all.deb
 f422ca042b1dd74c2c58a79d0663f238 123236 net optional amule-gnome-support_2.2.6+debian0-7_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktZ46QACgkQNxpp46476arAOgCeOIa97job01eZo19fMOe1ldBr
uzAAn3JH8pcDobGjFGH6/qyUJQ7dJ27t
=iDOA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.