Debian Bug report logs -
#292663
mutt blocks at recv after gnutls handshake
Reported by: Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters <miciah@myrealbox.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:33:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Found in versions 1.5.6-20040907+1, 1.5.6-20040907+2
Done: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters <miciah@myrealbox.com>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.6-20040907+1
I use Mutt with the IMAPS server at mail.myrealbox.com. Twice today,
Mutt has frozen. Both times, it had been idle, presumably polling
the mail server. The second time, I tried attaching to it with GDB:
% gdb -p 22641
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for
details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux".
Attaching to process 22641
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/mutt...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libncursesw.so.5...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libncursesw.so.5
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libidn.so.11...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libidn.so.11
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libdb-4.2.so...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libdb-4.2.so
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libdl.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libdl.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgpg-error.so.0...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgpg-error.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libz.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libz.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libnsl.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libnsl.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libnss_compat.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libnss_compat.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libnss_nis.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libnss_nis.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libnss_files.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libnss_files.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libnss_dns.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libnss_dns.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/sasl2/libsasldb.so.2...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/sasl2/libsasldb.so.2
0x402c7bfc in recv () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x402c7bfc in recv () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x40094795 in _gnutls_handshake_buffer_clear () from
/usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11
#2 0x400933c5 in _gnutls_io_read_buffered () from
/usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11
#3 0x40090e96 in _gnutls_recv_int () from /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11
#4 0x4009199f in gnutls_record_recv () from /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11
#5 0x080b063e in ?? ()
#6 0x08241a90 in ?? ()
#7 0x0822041c in ?? ()
#8 0x00000400 in ?? ()
I tried continuing and ctrl-c'ing a couple of times. The first time
(I believe) I got a 'Mailbox unchanged' message to appear in Mutt's
status bar. Eventually, after I had left it continuing
for a few minutes, it '[c]aught signal 15' and exited.
Should it happen again, what might I do to gain some more useful
information?
Much love!
--
Miciah Masters <miciah@myrealbox.com> / <mdm0304@mail.ecu.edu>
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@stud.uni-erlangen.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #10 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hello,
I just received a bugreport from another user which has the exactly same
symptoms with a Lotus Notes IMAP Server. It seems to be hcache related.
Could you please try to build 1.5.6-20040907+1 yourself once using
hcache and once without and try to access the IMAP server?
I am waiting for the moment for information from another user to track
this issue down. I will forward his eMails, if he allows me to.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=282451
Honestly,
Thomas
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #15 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
* Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters [Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:14:05 +0000]:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.6-20040907+1
> I use Mutt with the IMAPS server at mail.myrealbox.com. Twice today,
> Mutt has frozen. Both times, it had been idle, presumably polling
> the mail server. The second time, I tried attaching to it with GDB:
if this is still happening with -2, please tell and I'll provide you a
package with version #25 of the hcache patch to see if that fixes your
problem.
thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Miguel Bosé - 03 Miguel Bosé - Si tú no vuelves
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher
esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.
-- F. Nietzsche
Tags added: moreinfo
Request was from Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to mac@dgp.toronto.edu:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #22 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.6-20040907+2
Followup-For: Bug #282451
I am experiencing the same bug, but for me it is very persistent. Basically
every time I try to connect to imaps:// mailbox, mutt hangs right after I've
entered my remote username and password for TLS. gdb has shown the same stack
as reported earlier in this bug report. I'm trying to connect to a Debian
system running an imap server with "uw-imapd-ssl" (stable distro). I'm
willing to test out any patches you may have, or try other workarounds, to
further diagnose this problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages mutt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-9 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13 GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii libidn11 0.5.2-3 GNU libidn library, implementation
ii libncursesw5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.5 Authentication abstraction library
ii postfix [mail-transport-age 2.0.7-3 A high-performance mail transport
-- no debconf information
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to 282451@bugs.debian.org, Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #27 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
* Maciej Kalisiak [Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:14:57 -0500]:
> willing to test out any patches you may have, or try other workarounds, to
> further diagnose this problem.
Uhm, I read in the bug log that the first proposed fix was version #25
of the header cache patch. Please compile this package:
http://the-swirl.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005/01/15/mutt
If that doesn't solve, please report and we'll investigate. If you
can't compile, just say so and I'll provide a compiled package
tomorrow.
Thanks.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
He has never been known to use a word that might send a reader to the
dictionary.
-- William Faulkner (about Ernest Hemingway)
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to mac@dgp.toronto.edu:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #32 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 02:38:43AM +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> Uhm, I read in the bug log that the first proposed fix was version #25
> of the header cache patch. Please compile this package:
>
> http://the-swirl.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005/01/15/mutt
>
> If that doesn't solve, please report and we'll investigate. If you
> can't compile, just say so and I'll provide a compiled package
> tomorrow.
I will try it out, but I don't know where to get said patch... is there
some repository for them, or is it already there if I do "apt-get source
mutt"? There is a header-cache.diff patch in there, but I am not sure how to
assess its version #.
Is the diff tarball at the above URL any different from what I would get if I
just do "apt-get source mutt; debian/rules unpack"? Which one should I use
(the one at the URL has "+1~pre1" suffix instead of "+2")
--
I plan on living forever. So far, so good.
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to 282451@bugs.debian.org, Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #37 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
* Maciej Kalisiak [Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:57:02 -0500]:
> I will try it out, but I don't know where to get said patch... is there
> some repository for them, or is it already there if I do "apt-get source
> mutt"? There is a header-cache.diff patch in there, but I am not sure how to
> assess its version #.
The source package in the url above included it.
> Is the diff tarball at the above URL any different from what I would get if I
> just do "apt-get source mutt; debian/rules unpack"? Which one should I use
> (the one at the URL has "+1~pre1" suffix instead of "+2")
It is an in-progress version of the next upload to Debian, so yes,
it's different and _newer_ to what apt-get source mutt would give you.
Anyway, I've compiled the package and put it there, you can use that
and check.
Thanks.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
A hacker does for love what other would not do for money.
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to mac@dgp.toronto.edu:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #42 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:04:39AM +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> Anyway, I've compiled the package and put it there, you can use that
> and check.
OK, thanks.
I installed the new .deb and tried connecting to the imaps:// server.
Unfortunately I must report that the problem persists. Attaching to the
process with gdb and displaying the stack shows the same situation, with mutt
stuck on the recv() call.
--
"The release of atomic energy has not created a new problem. It has merely
made more urgent the necessity of solving an existing one." -- Albert
Einstein
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@stud.uni-erlangen.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #47 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hello,
could you please send me an useful backtrace?
apt-get install libc6-dbg
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug mutt
gdb /usr/bin/mutt
attach pid
reproduce the problem and type backtrace. :-)
Hopefully we get the name of the calling function.
Does this happen also with an empty mailbox?
Thomas
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to mac@dgp.toronto.edu:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #52 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:23:05AM +0100, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> could you please send me an useful backtrace?
>
> apt-get install libc6-dbg
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug mutt
>
> gdb /usr/bin/mutt
> attach pid
>
> reproduce the problem and type backtrace. :-)
Here is what I get:
(gdb) backtrace
#0 0x402cc276 in recv () from /usr/lib/debug/libc.so.6
#1 0x4009c7d5 in _gnutls_handshake_buffer_clear ()
from /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11
#2 0x4009b405 in _gnutls_io_read_buffered () from /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11
#3 0x40098ed6 in _gnutls_recv_int () from /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11
#4 0x400999df in gnutls_record_recv () from /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11
#5 0x080b085e in free ()
#6 0x080c25f4 in free ()
#7 0x080c26f2 in free ()
#8 0x080c7a28 in free ()
#9 0x080c8d78 in free ()
#10 0x080c9058 in free ()
#11 0x080c9544 in free ()
#12 0x08085989 in free ()
#13 0x0806428f in free ()
#14 0x0807c160 in free ()
#15 0x40209dc6 in __libc_start_main (main=0x807b600 <free+193832>, argc=1,
ubp_av=0x8154f30, init=0x80cf820 <free+538440>,
fini=0x80cf880 <free+538536>, rtld_fini=0x1ff, stack_end=0x400eb820)
at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:242
> Does this happen also with an empty mailbox?
Yes.
--
"A man who dares to waste one hour of time has not discovered the value of
life." -- Charles Robert Darwin
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to 282451@bugs.debian.org, Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #57 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
* Maciej Kalisiak [Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:14:24 -0500]:
> I installed the new .deb and tried connecting to the imaps:// server.
> Unfortunately I must report that the problem persists. Attaching to the
> process with gdb and displaying the stack shows the same situation, with mutt
> stuck on the recv() call.
OK. Then, let's try another thing. The original report seemed to have
something to do with the header cache. Could you try this package?
http://the-swirl.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005/01/21/mutt-nohcache
Thanks.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Miguel Bosé - Sevilla
One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to mac@dgp.toronto.edu:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #62 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:18:48PM +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> OK. Then, let's try another thing. The original report seemed to have
> something to do with the header cache. Could you try this package?
>
> http://the-swirl.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005/01/21/mutt-nohcache
No change. The backtrace is the same. I did some more poking around. Giving
the wrong password works as it should, with mutt saying the password was
incorrect, and resuming normal menu operation.
I also did a "strace -f -F -ff -o strace_out mutt" and here's the sequence of
events on the main mutt thread, starting with me finishing to enter password:
read(0, "*", 1) = 1
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x80a5bd0, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40147678},
NULL, 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x80a5bd0, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x40147678}, NULL, 8) = 0
read(0, "*", 1) = 1
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x80a5bd0, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40147678},
NULL, 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x80a5bd0, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x40147678}, NULL, 8) = 0
read(0, "*", 1) = 1
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x80a5bd0, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40147678},
NULL, 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x80a5bd0, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x40147678}, NULL, 8) = 0
read(0, "\r", 1) = 1
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x80a5bd0, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40147678},
NULL, 8) = 0
write(1, "\r\33[37m\33[40mLogging in...\33[K\33[m\17\33"..., 49) = 49
gettimeofday({1106417266, 484524}, NULL) = 0
getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, {ru_utime={0, 70000}, ru_stime={0, 10000}, ...}) = 0
time(NULL) = 1106417266
times({tms_utime=7, tms_stime=1, tms_cutime=1, tms_cstime=0}) = 9006147
gettimeofday({1106417266, 484764}, NULL) = 0
getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, {ru_utime={0, 70000}, ru_stime={0, 10000}, ...}) = 0
time(NULL) = 1106417266
times({tms_utime=7, tms_stime=1, tms_cutime=1, tms_cstime=0}) = 9006147
send(4, "\27\3\1\0\330\220VUN\2653\2416!\247I\225\311\16r\316G\370"..., 221, 0) = 221
recv(4, "\27\3\1\0\270", 5, 0) = 5
recv(4, "\251\3153\363T\247t\256\235\3252\2Xb\207\252\37\273\221"..., 183, 0) = 183
recv(4, "\226", 1, MSG_PEEK) = 1
gettimeofday({1106417266, 578025}, NULL) = 0
getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, {ru_utime={0, 70000}, ru_stime={0, 10000}, ...}) = 0
time(NULL) = 1106417266
times({tms_utime=7, tms_stime=1, tms_cutime=1, tms_cstime=0}) = 9006156
gettimeofday({1106417266, 578375}, NULL) = 0
getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, {ru_utime={0, 80000}, ru_stime={0, 10000}, ...}) = 0
time(NULL) = 1106417266
times({tms_utime=8, tms_stime=1, tms_cutime=1, tms_cstime=0}) = 9006157
recv(4, "\226", 1, 0) = 1
time(NULL) = 1106417266
gettimeofday({1106417266, 578597}, NULL) = 0
getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, {ru_utime={0, 80000}, ru_stime={0, 10000}, ...}) = 0
time(NULL) = 1106417266
times({tms_utime=8, tms_stime=1, tms_cutime=1, tms_cstime=0}) = 9006157
gettimeofday({1106417266, 578718}, NULL) = 0
getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, {ru_utime={0, 80000}, ru_stime={0, 10000}, ...}) = 0
time(NULL) = 1106417266
times({tms_utime=8, tms_stime=1, tms_cutime=1, tms_cstime=0}) = 9006157
send(4, "\27\3\1\0`\'\240`cH\3108\20\35\301\367\351\344\274\335"..., 101, 0) = 101
recv(4,
and this is where it hangs. I've indented the non-interesting calls. Seems
mutt sends the encrypted password, receives a response over a number of
recv()s, and then gets no response to its very next send()... not as helpful
as it could be, but perhaps it will be of use.
--
"If it weren't for lack of context, there would be no news." --Scott Adams
Maciej Kalisiak mac "at" dgp.toronto.edu www.dgp.toronto.edu/~mac
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>:
Bug#282451; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #67 received at 282451@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
clone 282451 -1
retitle -1 mutt blocks at recv after gnutls handshake
tag 282451 pending
thanks bot
There are two separate in #282451. The first one, reported by Miciah
Dashiel, is hcache related and will be solved in the next upload.
The second one, reported by Maciej Kalisiak, is a different problem.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
You've come to the right place. At debian-devel we are always willing
to argue over the meanings of words.
-- seen on debian-devel@l.d.o
Changed Bug title.
Request was from Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>:
Bug#292663; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to 292663@bugs.debian.org, Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #76 received at 292663@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
tag 292663 moreinfo
thanks
* Maciej Kalisiak [Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:22:02 -0500]:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:18:48PM +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> > OK. Then, let's try another thing. The original report seemed to have
> > something to do with the header cache. Could you try this package?
> > http://the-swirl.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005/01/21/mutt-nohcache
> No change. The backtrace is the same. I did some more poking around. Giving
> the wrong password works as it should, with mutt saying the password was
> incorrect, and resuming normal menu operation.
Hi,
does this still happen with recent versions of mutt? Can you try with
this one?:
http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005-09-19/mutt-1.5.11-pre/mutt_1.5.11-1~pre1_i386.deb
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
A lie can go round the world before the truth has got its boots on.
-- Terry Pratchett
Tags added: moreinfo
Request was from Adeodato Simó <asp16@alu.ua.es>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>:
Bug#292663; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #81 received at 292663@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Maciej,
sorry for the late followup - can you still reproduce the behavior
reported in #292663?
Re: Maciej Kalisiak 2005-01-22 <20050122182202.GA17511@khazad-dum>
> > OK. Then, let's try another thing. The original report seemed to have
> > something to do with the header cache. Could you try this package?
> >
> > http://the-swirl.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005/01/21/mutt-nohcache
>
> No change. The backtrace is the same. I did some more poking around. Giving
> the wrong password works as it should, with mutt saying the password was
> incorrect, and resuming normal menu operation.
>
> I also did a "strace -f -F -ff -o strace_out mutt" and here's the sequence of
> events on the main mutt thread, starting with me finishing to enter password:
[...]
> and this is where it hangs. I've indented the non-interesting calls. Seems
> mutt sends the encrypted password, receives a response over a number of
> recv()s, and then gets no response to its very next send()... not as helpful
> as it could be, but perhaps it will be of use.
Christoph
--
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>:
Bug#292663; Package mutt.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to "Maciej Kalisiak" <mac@dgp.toronto.edu>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #86 received at 292663@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
It's been ages since I've encountered that issue... even if it still
existed I doubt I'd be able to reproduce it now... :)
On 2/13/07, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
>
> sorry for the late followup - can you still reproduce the behavior
> reported in #292663?
>
> Re: Maciej Kalisiak 2005-01-22 <20050122182202.GA17511@khazad-dum>
> > > OK. Then, let's try another thing. The original report seemed to have
> > > something to do with the header cache. Could you try this package?
> > >
> > > http://the-swirl.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005/01/21/mutt-nohcache
> >
> > No change. The backtrace is the same. I did some more poking around. Giving
> > the wrong password works as it should, with mutt saying the password was
> > incorrect, and resuming normal menu operation.
> >
> > I also did a "strace -f -F -ff -o strace_out mutt" and here's the sequence of
> > events on the main mutt thread, starting with me finishing to enter password:
> [...]
> > and this is where it hangs. I've indented the non-interesting calls. Seems
> > mutt sends the encrypted password, receives a response over a number of
> > recv()s, and then gets no response to its very next send()... not as helpful
> > as it could be, but perhaps it will be of use.
>
> Christoph
> --
> cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFF0fJ9xa93SlhRC1oRApaiAJ4tR3SgxxZVf5Sf5XqG6mDf+AT5iACgstPU
> orymrniDJmQPTYKhgA4D/7E=
> =geIj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
Maciej Kalisiak
mac [at] dgp.toronto.edu
http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/~mac
Reply sent to Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility.
(full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent to Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters <miciah@myrealbox.com>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #91 received at 292663-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Re: Maciej Kalisiak 2007-02-13 <78e6ba310702130928n7a09d0b3h2812ef9c306b3f62@mail.gmail.com>
> It's been ages since I've encountered that issue... even if it still
> existed I doubt I'd be able to reproduce it now... :)
Hi,
thanks for the reply. Let's close the bug for now and hope it doesn't
pop up again...
Christoph
--
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Message #92 received at 292663-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
agreed.
On 2/14/07, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
> Re: Maciej Kalisiak 2007-02-13 <78e6ba310702130928n7a09d0b3h2812ef9c306b3f62@mail.gmail.com>
> > It's been ages since I've encountered that issue... even if it still
> > existed I doubt I'd be able to reproduce it now... :)
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the reply. Let's close the bug for now and hope it doesn't
> pop up again...
>
> Christoph
> --
> cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFF0vtVxa93SlhRC1oRAtlVAKDREZCtgLyoilE8z1Iohao5uqrJSwCgiXyM
> gq56wWJGWyXx6vmeoyGPyvU=
> =e0QG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
Maciej Kalisiak
mac [at] dgp.toronto.edu
http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/~mac
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org.
(Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:26:46 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Sat Jan 13 16:45:14 2018;
Machine Name:
buxtehude
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.