Debian Bug report logs - #269961
FTBFS: build-dep: doc++ does not exist(hppa/unstable)

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Martin Zobel-Helas <mhelas@helas.net>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: FTBFS: build-dep: doc++ does not exist(hppa/unstable)

Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 17:43:27 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: openh323
Severity: serious

from my build-log:

root@kara:/usr/src# apt-get build-dep openh323
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Build-Depends dependency for openh323 cannot be satisfied because the package
doc++ cannot be found
root@kara:/usr/src# cat /etc/apt/sources.list 
deb ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/debian sid main 
deb-src ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/debian sid main





-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15
-- 
  Martin Zobel-Helas     mhelas@helas.net   or   helas@gmx.net
  http://www.helas.net      or      http://mhelas.blogspot.com
  GPGKey-Fingerprint: 14744CACEF5CECFAE29E2CB17929AB90F7AC3AF0
  .
  Please don't CC me, I am reading the lists I am posting to.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #10 received at 269961@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kilian Krause <kk@verfaction.de>

To: Martin Zobel-Helas <mhelas@helas.net>, 269961@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#269961: FTBFS: build-dep: doc++ does not exist(hppa/unstable)

Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 18:04:17 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Martin,

we're trying to find a solution for that. Can you for the time being
please use the package from 

deb http://snapshot.debian.net/archive pool doc++

so that we can at least address the hppa FTBFS bug for gnomemeeting?
(And maybe fix this FTBFS in the same upload of openh323)

Thanks!

-- 
Best regards,
 Kilian

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 269961@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Martin Zobel-Helas <mhelas@helas.net>

To: Kilian Krause <kk@verfaction.de>

Cc: 269961@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#269961: FTBFS: build-dep: doc++ does not exist(hppa/unstable)

Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 18:42:08 +0200

Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> we're trying to find a solution for that. Can you for the time being
> please use the package from 
> 
> deb http://snapshot.debian.net/archive pool doc++
> 
> so that we can at least address the hppa FTBFS bug for gnomemeeting?
> (And maybe fix this FTBFS in the same upload of openh323)

I will do that.

Greetings
Martin
-- 
  Martin Zobel-Helas     mhelas@helas.net   or   helas@gmx.net
  http://www.helas.net      or      http://mhelas.blogspot.com
  GPGKey-Fingerprint: 14744CACEF5CECFAE29E2CB17929AB90F7AC3AF0
  .
  Please don't CC me, I am reading the lists I am posting to.

Message #20 received at 269961@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org

Cc: 269961@bugs.debian.org, 265273@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Reintroduce doc++ to sarge, Build-Depends for other packages

Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 08:20:56 +1000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Debian-release,

It would appear that doc++ was incorrectly removed from both testing and 
unstable as it was thought that it was obsoleted by a Java documentation 
package, however doc++ was also an important Build-Depends for a number of 
packages in sarge (See #265273 for history):

  dancer-xml
  dlisp
  dmachinemon
  fwbuilder
  libdshconfig
  libfwbuilder
  openh323
  pwlib

I have prepared a NMU of doc++ (from snapshot.debian.net), loaded into 
incoming and would request that it be processed though the queue quickly and 
be replaced back into sarge.

Thanks,
Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBPOLLoCzanz0IthIRAv3sAJ9OaDoIQ9ketTiuUTty6pdS1r3ldACfWFvV
v1tCP2qehFiAU3h0O3yFcAc=
=pBfU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #25 received at 269961@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

To: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>

Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, 269961@bugs.debian.org, 265273@bugs.debian.org, ftpmaster@debian.org

Subject: Re: Reintroduce doc++ to sarge, Build-Depends for other packages

Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 20:27:25 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:20:56AM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> It would appear that doc++ was incorrectly removed from both testing and 
> unstable as it was thought that it was obsoleted by a Java documentation 
> package, however doc++ was also an important Build-Depends for a number of 
> packages in sarge (See #265273 for history):

>   dancer-xml
>   dlisp
>   dmachinemon
>   fwbuilder
>   libdshconfig
>   libfwbuilder
>   openh323
>   pwlib

> I have prepared a NMU of doc++ (from snapshot.debian.net), loaded into 
> incoming and would request that it be processed though the queue quickly and 
> be replaced back into sarge.

Actually, someone else already beat you to NMUing, but it is sitting in
the NEW queue nevertheless.

It just needs to have an ftpmaster approve it.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #30 received at 269961@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>

To: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>

Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, 269961@bugs.debian.org, 265273@bugs.debian.org, ftpmaster@debian.org

Subject: Re: Reintroduce doc++ to sarge, Build-Depends for other packages

Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 19:19:07 +0100

Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:20:56AM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
>> It would appear that doc++ was incorrectly removed from both testing and 
>> unstable as it was thought that it was obsoleted by a Java documentation 
>> package, however doc++ was also an important Build-Depends for a number of 
>> packages in sarge (See #265273 for history):
>
>>   dancer-xml
>>   dlisp
>>   dmachinemon
>>   fwbuilder
>>   libdshconfig
>>   libfwbuilder
>>   openh323
>>   pwlib
>
>> I have prepared a NMU of doc++ (from snapshot.debian.net), loaded into 
>> incoming and would request that it be processed though the queue quickly and 
>> be replaced back into sarge.
>
> Actually, someone else already beat you to NMUing, but it is sitting in
> the NEW queue nevertheless.
>
> It just needs to have an ftpmaster approve it.

Guys you can't NMU a removed package back into the archive - someone
needs to take it over.

Don't re-upload it with the old Maintainer field.  The previous
maintainer explicitly requested it be removed, clearly doesn't want
responsibility for it and that can't be forced on them.

-- 
James

Message #35 received at 269961@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Stefan Gybas <sgybas@debian.org>

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org

Cc: 269961@bugs.debian.org, 265273@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Reintroduce doc++ to sarge, Build-Depends for other packages

Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:33:17 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Mark Purcell wrote:

> It would appear that doc++ was incorrectly removed from both testing and 
> unstable as it was thought that it was obsoleted by a Java documentation 
> package, however doc++ was also an important Build-Depends for a number of 
> packages in sarge (See #265273 for history):

Sorry, this was my fault! I thought that only Java packages were using 
doc++ as a replacement for javadoc. The pkg-java team switched most of 
the Java packages to gjdoc and when I requested the removal of 
mozilla-ldapsdk (the last Java package that was using doc++) I thought 
doc++ could also be removed.

Of course, I should have checked the build dependencies first (I only 
checked package dependencies). Sorry again for the trouble that I've 
caused and for my late reply. I've been away a couple of days since last 
Friday.

If someone wants to take over doc++ you are more than welcome! You 
should probably re-open the closed doc++ bugs and fix them if possible. 
But upstream delevopment seems to have stopped (the last update was in 
December 2002) so doxygen might be a better solution for the packages 
that currently use doc++.

Stefan

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #40 received at 269961-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>

To: 269961-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#269961: fixed in doc++ 3.4.10-3

Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 20:04:28 -0400

Source: doc++
Source-Version: 3.4.10-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
doc++, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

doc++_3.4.10-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/doc++/doc++_3.4.10-3.diff.gz
doc++_3.4.10-3.dsc
  to pool/main/d/doc++/doc++_3.4.10-3.dsc
doc++_3.4.10-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/doc++/doc++_3.4.10-3_i386.deb
doc++_3.4.10.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/doc++/doc++_3.4.10.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 269961@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org> (supplier of updated doc++ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  6 Sep 2004 20:53:51 +0200
Source: doc++
Binary: doc++
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.4.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
Description: 
 doc++      - A documentation system for C/C++, IDL and Java
Closes: 269961 269962 269998 269999 270000 270002 270004
Changes: 
 doc++ (3.4.10-3) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Reintroducing this package in the archive.
   It was requested to be removed by the maintainer in #265273, but
   it is needed by other packages.
   (Closes: #269962, #269961, #269998, #269999, #270000, #270002, #270004)
 .
   * Urgency high, as this package is also needed in testing.
   * Forced to get this package by ftpmasters
Files: 
 63112fde109b8e78c848ed4b5333c3a6 610 devel optional doc++_3.4.10-3.dsc
 095c7a3a822f00a33033b8bb40147445 408887 devel optional doc++_3.4.10.orig.tar.gz
 7313805ec6969ddb3643b550b7bf4dde 9627 devel optional doc++_3.4.10-3.diff.gz
 aabcd86960927bb812426dc2187eb26b 399100 devel optional doc++_3.4.10-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBPgpES+BYJZB4jhERAnygAKChkJP551coEyr+r6CHYuOPGvGquwCgjWNW
9oqNRU9XSHEPPsMEC/kcUI4=
=5wCD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.