Debian Bug report logs - #238686
mldonkey-server: core dump of mldonkey-users command at startup

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastien Bernard <sbernard@nerim.net>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: mldonkey-server: core dump of mldonkey-users command at startup

Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:21:18 +0100

Package: mldonkey-server
Version: 2.5.16-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: user security hole

The package is unable to install itself on a sparc64 system because the posinit script fails with a bus error.
The command provoking the bus error is the mldonkey-users.
This happens only if you setup a password for the admin user in the debconf selection screen.
This leads to either leave the package unconfigured (unusable) if one does set a password,
either do not specify a password for admin user and leaving the mldonkey-server process configurable to anyone.

I was unable to get a backtrace of the stack with gdb (this is supposely because of the OCAML language used).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages mldonkey-server depends on:
ii  adduser                     3.51         Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]       1.4.16       Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  mime-support                3.26-1       MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-5    compression library - runtime

-- debconf information excluded

Message #10 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>

To: Sebastien Bernard <sbernard@nerim.net>, 238686@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238686: mldonkey-server: core dump of mldonkey-users command at startup

Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:12:59 +0100

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Sebastien Bernard wrote:
> Package: mldonkey-server
> Version: 2.5.16-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
> Justification: user security hole
> 
> The package is unable to install itself on a sparc64 system because the posinit script fails with a bus error.
> The command provoking the bus error is the mldonkey-users.
> This happens only if you setup a password for the admin user in the debconf selection screen.
> This leads to either leave the package unconfigured (unusable) if one does set a password,
> either do not specify a password for admin user and leaving the mldonkey-server process configurable to anyone.
> 
> I was unable to get a backtrace of the stack with gdb (this is supposely because of the OCAML language used).
> 
Hello,

Well your problem is not really coming from mldonkey itself but from
ocaml compiled binary on sparc64. It won't be a "grave" bug since, if
you cannot run ocaml application, you cannot run mldonkey ( ie no
security hole in the program because there is no program ).

I will forward your bug to the debian-ocaml-maint ML since there are
better than me to solve this issue. I also think this bug should be
downgraded to important. 

Thanks for the report
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall

Message #15 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>

To: Sébastien Bernard <sbernard@nerim.net>, 238686@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238686: mldonkey-server: core dump of mldonkey-users command at startup

Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:46:04 +0100

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 11:03:48PM +0100, Sébastien Bernard wrote:
> >
> > Well your problem is not really coming from mldonkey itself but from
> > ocaml compiled binary on sparc64. It won't be a "grave" bug since, if
> > you cannot run ocaml application, you cannot run mldonkey ( ie no
> > security hole in the program because there is no program ).
> >
> > I will forward your bug to the debian-ocaml-maint ML since there are
> > better than me to solve this issue. I also think this bug should be
> > downgraded to important.
> >
> > Thanks for the report
> > Kind regard
> > Sylvain Le Gall
> >
> Well, it is indeed unusable (the mldonkey-server start briefly but end
> with a signal 10 - I don't know absolutely what's going on.
> 
> Maybe this bug could go to the ocaml compiler (sparc architecture
> broken...) ? I mean move the bug to the ocaml compiler.
> Is the sparc version working at all ? For now this package is completely
> broken for me.
> 
> 

Yep, i think so.

In fact there is two part on the problem :
- ocaml in itself ( the bug you are describing is not the first one i
  have seen about ocaml apps on sparc )
- C code embeded in ocaml which can have incorrect alignement ( in
  particular C functions used to compute hash, the one used in
  mldonkey_users ).

The problem is complex, but i don't think it is worth a grave bug ( i
prefer to have one architecture semi broken than a totally outdated
package in Sarge -- it is really personnal since technically i should
shipped mldonkey-server for all arch ). So i think i will downgrade to
important ( for the delay ), and try to see if i can solve the problem.

But i think there is no real solution. ( if it is ocaml compiler, it
should be a big problem for all ocaml package -- which will lead us to
tags all ocaml package to !sparc ( if i remember well ))

Things you can do for me, is try other ocaml software in order to see if
the other runs ( i don't have a list at hand, but you can try hevea,
hlins... ). If the other are running, it is a mldonkey problem.

Do you agree with my solution or do you prefer to let this bug as grave ?

( ie i won't downgrade if you don't agree )

Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall

Message #20 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Sylvain LE GALL" <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>

To: 238686@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Downgrade ?

Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:19:11 +0200

Hello,

Well, i have no answer from your part, wether or not you perform to run
ocaml application without problem...

I would like to downgrade the bug to important + upstream. Do you
authorize me to do so ?

If you have any further information on this kind of bug, feel free to
send it to me, in order to know if i can do anything.

Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall

Message #23 received at 238686-submitter@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Sylvain LE GALL" <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>

To: 238686-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: [: Downgrade ?]

Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:09:37 +0200

Hello,

I permit myself to reforward you this message, since some one tell me
that i have send the initial message to the bad bug recipient...

Sorry if you receive it twice.

Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
----- Forwarded message from  -----

Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:19:11 +0200
To: 238686@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Downgrade ?
Message-ID: <20040329201911.GA4709@grand>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Status: RO

Hello,

Well, i have no answer from your part, wether or not you perform to run
ocaml application without problem...

I would like to downgrade the bug to important + upstream. Do you
authorize me to do so ?

If you have any further information on this kind of bug, feel free to
send it to me, in order to know if i can do anything.

Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall

----- End forwarded message -----

Message #28 received at 238686-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sébastien Bernard <sbernard@nerim.net>

To: "Sylvain LE GALL" <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>, 238686-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238686: [: Downgrade ?]

Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 12:28:16 +0200 (CEST)

Sorry, I did not receive the first mail.
I tried heveas, and it starts correctly.
I do not know how to use this software but the core is starting correctly
and waits for some kind of input. So it workS.
I am not convinced that ocaml is the culprit....
Would you like to access my machine for testing. I can give you a shell
account to check (U1 143Mhz 96Mo, not a top speed machine).

What we can do is either :
  1- Requalify this bug to an ocaml bug (I think the grave status is
appropriate since it is a miscompilation)
  2- Create another bug related to ocaml and link this bug to the ocaml one
     and downgrade this one.

But before, I would make myself sure that ocaml is really the culprit.

> Hello,
>
> I permit myself to reforward you this message, since some one tell me
> that i have send the initial message to the bad bug recipient...
>
> Sorry if you receive it twice.
>
> Kind regard
> Sylvain Le Gall
> ----- Forwarded message from  -----
>
> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:19:11 +0200
> To: 238686@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Downgrade ?
> Message-ID: <20040329201911.GA4709@grand>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
> Status: RO
>
> Hello,
>
> Well, i have no answer from your part, wether or not you perform to run
> ocaml application without problem...
>
> I would like to downgrade the bug to important + upstream. Do you
> authorize me to do so ?
>
> If you have any further information on this kind of bug, feel free to
> send it to me, in order to know if i can do anything.
>
> Kind regard
> Sylvain Le Gall
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
>

Message #33 received at 238686-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Sylvain LE GALL" <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>

To: Sébastien Bernard <sbernard@nerim.net>, 238686-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238686: [: Downgrade ?]

Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 23:13:24 +0200

Hello,

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:28:16PM +0200, Sébastien Bernard wrote:
> Sorry, I did not receive the first mail.

Normal... I did not send it to the good adress ;-)

> I tried heveas, and it starts correctly.
> I do not know how to use this software but the core is starting correctly
> and waits for some kind of input. So it workS.
> I am not convinced that ocaml is the culprit....

And indeed you are right. I have submitted a bug in the mldonkey BTS in
order to see this... I think it comes from a C code embeded in mldonkey
( hash function ).

> Would you like to access my machine for testing. I can give you a shell
> account to check (U1 143Mhz 96Mo, not a top speed machine).
> 

Well, i think it would be the best idea -- BUT this bugs is not trivial
at all and require a heavy knowledge on arch things. I could try to
solve it, but i am not sure i will perfom to do it :
- i could inject bad regression ( in the hashing function )
- i could create border effect 
- i am not a crypto expert

> What we can do is either :
>   1- Requalify this bug to an ocaml bug (I think the grave status is
> appropriate since it is a miscompilation)
>   2- Create another bug related to ocaml and link this bug to the ocaml one
>      and downgrade this one.
> 
> But before, I would make myself sure that ocaml is really the culprit.
> 

I agree with : you ocaml is not the culprit, i think it comes from the C
code.

What i can propose to you, is to try working a little on this bug... if
the solution is almost trivial, submit a patch to upstream and applied
it to 2.5.16-3 ?

However, i could not fix all bugs regarding your arch ( sparc64 is not
the most installed linux platform ). 

If you feel that this bug is important enough, i could try to take a
look at the code.

I will send you a login/password in a "not forwarded to BTS" mail. 

Could you install gdb, and all mldonkey dependency on the machine. I
should have at least the possibility to build mldonkey on your machine.

If i don't perform the bugs correction, i think we have two solution :
- restrict mldonkey ( !sparc64 )
- downgrade the bug ( it is more an important bugs, since it is not a
  really security hole, since nothing works ).

Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall

Message #38 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Sylvain LE GALL" <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>

To: 238686@bugs.debian.org, 238686-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org

Subject: Bug #238686, please help me ( mldonkey related )

Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:36:49 +0200

Hello,

I permit to send this mail to debian-ocaml-maint ( official place where
debian ocaml maintainer can talk ).

Well, following a strange bus error, Mr Bernard let me log into his
system to try compiling mldonkey...

It seems to be worse than what i think... It doesn't even compile. I get
this error :

/usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -linkall -o ocamlpp.byte       -custom unix.cma
str.cma -cclib -lz    -I build         tools/ocamlpp.cmo  
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07/libstr.a when
searching for -lstr
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstr
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

But it also raises a similar error for unix et al... Just like all the
ocaml library has problem !

The system is :
Linux calypso 2.6.2 #1 Mon Feb 16 01:12:55 CET 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux

Maybe it comes from the sparc64 arch ?

Is anyone has ever got the same error ?

I am really lost ( i have already compiled ocaml on sparc architecture,
but don't encounter the same error ).

Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall

Message #43 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

To: 238686@bugs.debian.org, 238686-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug #238686, please help me ( mldonkey related )

Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:55:17 +0200

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 05:36:49PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I permit to send this mail to debian-ocaml-maint ( official place where
> debian ocaml maintainer can talk ).
> 
> Well, following a strange bus error, Mr Bernard let me log into his
> system to try compiling mldonkey...
> 
> It seems to be worse than what i think... It doesn't even compile. I get
> this error :
> 
> /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -linkall -o ocamlpp.byte       -custom unix.cma
> str.cma -cclib -lz    -I build         tools/ocamlpp.cmo  
> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07/libstr.a when
> searching for -lstr
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstr
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> But it also raises a similar error for unix et al... Just like all the
> ocaml library has problem !
> 
> The system is :
> Linux calypso 2.6.2 #1 Mon Feb 16 01:12:55 CET 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux
> 
> Maybe it comes from the sparc64 arch ?

Yep, see Bug#241024 for a similar issue. This is solved by :

  Telling ld that I have a sparc32 solves it.

Friendly,

Sven Luther

Message #54 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sébastien Bernard <sbernard@nerim.net>

To: "Sven Luther" <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>, 238686-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 238686@bugs.debian.org, 238686-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238686: Bug #238686, please help me ( mldonkey related )

Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 00:10:30 +0200 (CEST)

>> /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -linkall -o ocamlpp.byte       -custom unix.cma
>> str.cma -cclib -lz    -I build         tools/ocamlpp.cmo
>> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07/libstr.a when
>> searching for -lstr
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstr
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Normal, it is looking for the 64bit str librarie which does not exists.
The incompatible qualifier means mismatch between 64 and 32 bit.

>>
>> But it also raises a similar error for unix et al... Just like all the
>> ocaml library has problem !
>>
>> The system is :
>> Linux calypso 2.6.2 #1 Mon Feb 16 01:12:55 CET 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> Maybe it comes from the sparc64 arch ?
>
> Yep, see Bug#241024 for a similar issue. This is solved by :
>
>   Telling ld that I have a sparc32 solves it.
The solution is to prefix the debuild with the sparc32 command which put
the correct environnement variable to generate for 32bits.
So, try to rather do :
sparc32 debuild
instead of
debuild
I forgot to tell you that I was bitten by this bug a few months ago (when
sparc64 maintainers decided that gcc will generate 64bits by default).

Message #67 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sébastien Bernard <sbernard@nerim.net>

To: 238686@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Found a patch to prevent the bus error

Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:25:56 +0200 (CEST)

I wandered on the mldonkey-bugs and found those references :
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/mldonkey-bugs/2004-03/msg00005.html and
the reply :
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/mldonkey-bugs/2004-03/msg00006.html This
talks about Solaris 9 but it is really a sparc problem.
I applied the same patch as proposed and rebuild the whole things and now
it works. Here is the output of mldonkey_users:
> seb@calypso:~/mldonkey-2.5.16$ ./debian/utils/mldonkey_users
> TigerTree: Exception File "src/utils/lib/md4.ml", line 0, characters
502-10: Assertion failed
> Unable to compute correct Tiger trees.
> Send a bug report with your configuration
> and how you obtained this executable.
> Running with Tiger tree corruption detection disabled.
> (used only if you run the Gnutella plugin)
> Fatal error: exception Mldonkey_users.No_downloads_ini
Now the next thing to do is :
Can we fix this tiger'thing and make it work ? For so far I remember, I
always got this error when starting the mldonkey server.
Is this helpful (some kind of autocorrection code I think) or can we
disable it for the sparc architecture ?

Message #72 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Sylvain LE GALL" <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>

To: Sébastien Bernard <sbernard@nerim.net>, 238686@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238686: Found a patch to prevent the bus error

Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 22:34:41 +0200

Hello,

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:25:56AM +0200, Sébastien Bernard wrote:
> I wandered on the mldonkey-bugs and found those references :
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/mldonkey-bugs/2004-03/msg00005.html and
> the reply :
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/mldonkey-bugs/2004-03/msg00006.html This
> talks about Solaris 9 but it is really a sparc problem.
> I applied the same patch as proposed and rebuild the whole things and now
> it works. Here is the output of mldonkey_users:
> > seb@calypso:~/mldonkey-2.5.16$ ./debian/utils/mldonkey_users
> > TigerTree: Exception File "src/utils/lib/md4.ml", line 0, characters
> 502-10: Assertion failed
> > Unable to compute correct Tiger trees.
> > Send a bug report with your configuration
> > and how you obtained this executable.
> > Running with Tiger tree corruption detection disabled.
> > (used only if you run the Gnutella plugin)
> > Fatal error: exception Mldonkey_users.No_downloads_ini

God bless the active bug submitter ;-)

> Now the next thing to do is :
> Can we fix this tiger'thing and make it work ? For so far I remember, I
> always got this error when starting the mldonkey server.
> Is this helpful (some kind of autocorrection code I think) or can we
> disable it for the sparc architecture ?
> 

Well, i think it should be hard to correct the tiger tree computation...
I am not a crypto expert, i am not sure you are... We can try to do it,
but we will never be sure, if it's work for all arch...

What i can propose to you : i will patch mldonkey for your arch only ( i
remember that dpatch support arch specific patch ), and we will append
the patch to the upstream bug...

After this, i will downgrade the bug from RC to important ( because we
only find a work around, but the bug is still there ).

I agree that the best should be to correct it for all arch, but i am a
little afraid by crypto complexity... If you feel you are able to take
this bug, i think upstream will really be happy.

Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall

ps : i am preparing 2.5.17 release.

Message #77 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Sylvain LE GALL" <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>

To: Sébastien Bernard <sbernard@nerim.net>, 238686@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238686: Found a patch to prevent the bus error

Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 23:25:06 +0200

Hello again,

There is a lot of patch proposed... 

Can you give me the patch you have applied ( or produce it with a diff
).

It will save me time ( anyway, i will try to rebuild on your sparc, but
don't want to take too much time on your machine ).

Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:25:56AM +0200, Sébastien Bernard wrote:
> I wandered on the mldonkey-bugs and found those references :
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/mldonkey-bugs/2004-03/msg00005.html and
> the reply :
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/mldonkey-bugs/2004-03/msg00006.html This
> talks about Solaris 9 but it is really a sparc problem.
> I applied the same patch as proposed and rebuild the whole things and now
> it works. Here is the output of mldonkey_users:
> > seb@calypso:~/mldonkey-2.5.16$ ./debian/utils/mldonkey_users
> > TigerTree: Exception File "src/utils/lib/md4.ml", line 0, characters
> 502-10: Assertion failed
> > Unable to compute correct Tiger trees.
> > Send a bug report with your configuration
> > and how you obtained this executable.
> > Running with Tiger tree corruption detection disabled.
> > (used only if you run the Gnutella plugin)
> > Fatal error: exception Mldonkey_users.No_downloads_ini
> Now the next thing to do is :
> Can we fix this tiger'thing and make it work ? For so far I remember, I
> always got this error when starting the mldonkey server.
> Is this helpful (some kind of autocorrection code I think) or can we
> disable it for the sparc architecture ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Message #92 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "spiralvoice" <noreply@savannah.nongnu.org>

To: 238686@bugs.debian.org

Subject: [bugs #8395] MD4 Hashing seems to segfault

Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:08:36 -0700

This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: mldonkey, a multi-networks file-sharing client.

/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #8395] Latest Modifications:

Changes by: 
		spiralvoice <spiralvoice@hotmail.com>
'Date: 
		Fri 07/23/04 at 00:07 (Europe/Berlin)

------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
As this bug seems to be Sparc specific and Ocaml also involved can I close this bug here?






/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #8395] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=8395>
Project: mldonkey, a multi-networks file-sharing client
Submitted by: Sylvain LE GALL
On: Wed 03/31/04 at 20:25

Category:  Core
Severity:  5 - Average
Item Group:  Segmentation Fault
Resolution:  None
Assigned to:  None
Status:  Open
Release:  2-5-16
Release:  
Platform Version:  Linux
Binaries Origin:  Debian package
CPU type:  Sparc


Summary:  MD4 Hashing seems to segfault

Original Submission:  Hello,

I am the debian maintainer of mldonkey. 

A user submit me a bug about a debian specific program ( 
mldonkey_user ) that seems to segfault. This program only
use the MD4 hashing of mldonkey ( in order to compute 
user password ). 

This program and mldonkey seems to segfault... I think it
comes from the .c files which are required to do hashing.

You can find further information on :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=238686

If you think this only the original program fault ( 
mldonkey_user ) just let me know, i will try to find a 
workaround ( but the program is 100 lines long, and seems
to work fine everywhere else ).

Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall

Follow-up Comments
------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri 07/23/04 at 00:07         By: spiralvoice
As this bug seems to be Sparc specific and Ocaml also involved can I close this bug here?




CC List
-------

CC Address                          | Comment
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
238686 --AT-- bugs --DOT-- debian --DOT-- org | 









For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=8395>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/

Message #97 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Amorphous <savannah-bounces@gnu.org>

To: 238686@bugs.debian.org, Sylvain LE GALL <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>, spiralvoice <spiralvoice@hotmail.com>, mldonkey-bugs@nongnu.org

Subject: [bugs #8395] MD4 Hashing seems to segfault on sparc64

Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:11:01 +0000

Update of bugs #8395 (project mldonkey):

                 Summary: MD4 Hashing seems to segfault => MD4 Hashing seems
to segfault on sparc64


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=8395>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/

Message #102 received at 238686@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: spiralvoice <savannah-bounces@gnu.org>

To: 238686@bugs.debian.org, Sylvain LE GALL <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>, spiralvoice <spiralvoice@compuserve.de>, mldonkey-bugs@nongnu.org

Subject: [bug #8395] MD4 Hashing seems to segfault on sparc64

Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:13:52 +0000

Update of bug #8395 (project mldonkey):

                  Status:                    None => Wont Fix               
             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed                 

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #3:

This patch report is old. If the bug still exists in current
versions please post a new bug report - spiralvoice

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=8395>

_______________________________________________
  Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.