Debian Bug report logs - #238301
please use DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN when installing sarge, etch, or sid, as is done for hoary and warty

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:20:53 +0000

Package: debian-installer
Version: As of 20040412
Severity: normal

During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
This means that when the packages get upgraded they prompt for
configuration.

While this is probably mostly OK for a stable release since upgrades are
infrequent I can see this creating problems with security updates and
point releases as well which is probably undesirable.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8

Message #10 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

To: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>, 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:14:19 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Mark Brown wrote:
> During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
> to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
> This means that when the packages get upgraded they prompt for
> configuration.

Incorrect, they are installed in the normal way but with the
noninteractive debconf frontend. The config scripts run. Any package
that behaves as you describe when installed this way is broken; this is
doubly true for packages in the base system which have all been
installed in this way since before the release of woody.

Please clone and/or reassign this bug to the broken packages.

-- 
see shy jo

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>

To: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:38:26 +0000

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:14:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> > During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
> > to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
> > This means that when the packages get upgraded they prompt for
> > configuration.

> Incorrect, they are installed in the normal way but with the
> noninteractive debconf frontend. The config scripts run. Any package
> that behaves as you describe when installed this way is broken; this is

It seems to be happening an awful lot - I'd suggest including some kind
of automated reinstall of all the packages in the testing of the
installer (next time I do an install I'll probably give this a whirl).

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Message #20 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>

To: 238301@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:40:14 +0000

clone 238301 -1
reassign -1 setserial
thanks

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:14:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
> > to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
> > This means that when the packages get upgraded they prompt for
> > configuration.

> Incorrect, they are installed in the normal way but with the
> noninteractive debconf frontend. The config scripts run. Any package
> that behaves as you describe when installed this way is broken; this is

setserial is one of the packages I remember doing this to me on upgrade
- it prompted me for autosave-types.

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Message #27 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

To: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>, 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:56:22 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:14:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
> > > to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
> > > This means that when the packages get upgraded they prompt for
> > > configuration.
> 
> > Incorrect, they are installed in the normal way but with the
> > noninteractive debconf frontend. The config scripts run. Any package
> > that behaves as you describe when installed this way is broken; this is
> 
> It seems to be happening an awful lot - I'd suggest including some kind
> of automated reinstall of all the packages in the testing of the
> installer (next time I do an install I'll probably give this a whirl).

I can't imagine how it could happen at all without some great care being
taken to make debconf behave in a way it truely does not want to, or a
debconf behavior I am not anticipating. Can you provide an example of a
debconf database before the upgrade, plus the upgrade with
DEBCONF_DEBUG='.*' ?

-- 
see shy jo

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #32 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>

To: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:30:32 +0000

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:56:22PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:

> I can't imagine how it could happen at all without some great care being
> taken to make debconf behave in a way it truely does not want to, or a
> debconf behavior I am not anticipating. Can you provide an example of a
> debconf database before the upgrade, plus the upgrade with
> DEBCONF_DEBUG='.*' ?

I'll try to find another machine to do an install on but I don't know
when that'll be.

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Message #39 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>

To: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

Cc: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:55:03 +0100

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:56:22PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> > It seems to be happening an awful lot - I'd suggest including some kind
> > of automated reinstall of all the packages in the testing of the
> > installer (next time I do an install I'll probably give this a whirl).

> I can't imagine how it could happen at all without some great care being
> taken to make debconf behave in a way it truely does not want to, or a
> debconf behavior I am not anticipating. Can you provide an example of a
> debconf database before the upgrade, plus the upgrade with
> DEBCONF_DEBUG='.*' ?

I've found some more instances of this problem.  I managed to catch a
diff of the config files before and after the upgrade, though I didn't
remember to rerun the upgrade or cache the entire database:

--- config.dat-old	2004-07-23 20:09:40.000000000 +0100
+++ config.dat	2004-07-25 21:43:15.207208392 +0100
@@ -3,6 +3,12 @@
 Value: true
 Owners: adduser
 
+Name: alsa-base/alsactl_store_on_shutdown
+Template: alsa-base/alsactl_store_on_shutdown
+Value: autosave always
+Owners: alsa-base
+Flags: seen
+
 Name: anacron/jobs_in_crontab
 Template: anacron/jobs_in_crontab
 Owners: anacron
@@ -1060,11 +1066,13 @@
 Template: debconf/frontend
 Value: Dialog
 Owners: debconf
+Flags: seen
 
 Name: debconf/priority
 Template: debconf/priority
-Value: medium
+Value: low
 Owners: d-i, debconf
+Flags: seen
 
 Name: debian-installer/country
 Template: debian-installer/country
@@ -1085,6 +1093,7 @@
 Template: debsums/apt-autogen
 Value: true
 Owners: debsums
+Flags: seen
 
 Name: dictionaries-common/default-ispell
 Template: dictionaries-common/default-ispell
@@ -1423,6 +1432,7 @@
 Template: mozilla/locale_auto
 Value: true
 Owners: mozilla-browser
+Flags: seen
 
 Name: mozilla/prefs_note
 Template: mozilla/prefs_note

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Message #44 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

To: Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>

Cc: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:32:58 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Mark Brown wrote:
> I've found some more instances of this problem.  I managed to catch a
> diff of the config files before and after the upgrade, though I didn't
> remember to rerun the upgrade or cache the entire database:

Now I understand. This is because debootstrap installs packages using
the noninteractive frontend which does not set questions to seen as the
user has indeed not seen them. It's true that this could lead to some
questions that have already set and presumably working values being asked
on upgrade. 

I don't know of a good way to avoid this at this time; debconf's
handling of the seen flag for the noninteractive frontend is basically
correct; debootstrap's use of the noninteractive frontend is correct,
and there's no way d-i can go back after the fact and mark questions as
seen.

-- 
see shy jo

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #49 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>

To: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

Cc: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:37:00 +0100

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 02:32:58PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:

> I don't know of a good way to avoid this at this time; debconf's
> handling of the seen flag for the noninteractive frontend is basically
> correct; debootstrap's use of the noninteractive frontend is correct,
> and there's no way d-i can go back after the fact and mark questions as
> seen.

Perhaps it would help if when changing an option that would change what
you see Debconf should offer to rerun config scripts so that being
prompted for unseen options happens then (when you know why) rather than
randomly later?  It's pretty gross but it's fairly non-invasive and I
guess some people might find it useful.

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Message #58 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

To: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:33:45 +0100

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 02:32:58PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > I've found some more instances of this problem.  I managed to catch a
> > diff of the config files before and after the upgrade, though I didn't
> > remember to rerun the upgrade or cache the entire database:
> 
> Now I understand. This is because debootstrap installs packages using
> the noninteractive frontend which does not set questions to seen as the
> user has indeed not seen them. It's true that this could lead to some
> questions that have already set and presumably working values being asked
> on upgrade. 
> 
> I don't know of a good way to avoid this at this time; debconf's
> handling of the seen flag for the noninteractive frontend is basically
> correct; debootstrap's use of the noninteractive frontend is correct,
> and there's no way d-i can go back after the fact and mark questions as
> seen.

This patch implements a DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN environment variable
that debootstrap can set to make the noninteractive frontend behave a
little differently, without risking breaking other uses of the
noninteractive frontend. What do you think?

  http://patches.ubuntulinux.org/patches/debconf.238301.diff

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@debian.org]

Message #63 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

To: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>, 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:25:06 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Colin Watson wrote:
> This patch implements a DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN environment variable
> that debootstrap can set to make the noninteractive frontend behave a
> little differently, without risking breaking other uses of the
> noninteractive frontend. What do you think?

This looks reasonable, I think you could have avoided the duplication of
near-identical new classes.

I guess you've tested it and verified it has no other effects to a
debcootrstrapped system?

-- 
see shy jo

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #68 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

To: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

Cc: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:02:35 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:25:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > This patch implements a DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN environment variable
> > that debootstrap can set to make the noninteractive frontend behave a
> > little differently, without risking breaking other uses of the
> > noninteractive frontend. What do you think?
> 
> This looks reasonable, I think you could have avoided the duplication of
> near-identical new classes.

That's possible ... suggestions for naming of the common class? I'd been
thinking the new classes were small enough not to matter too much.

Maybe some magic could go into Debconf::Element::Noninteractive.

> I guess you've tested it and verified it has no other effects to a
> debcootrstrapped system?

/var/cache/debconf/config.dat diff attached (for Ubuntu rather than
Debian, but hey); /etc is identical except for a popularity-contest
configuration file that has the output of uuidgen in it.

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@debian.org]

[config.dat.diff (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #73 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

To: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

Cc: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:13:56 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Colin Watson wrote:
> That's possible ... suggestions for naming of the common class? I'd been
> thinking the new classes were small enough not to matter too much.
> 
> Maybe some magic could go into Debconf::Element::Noninteractive.

Yes, it seems to me most noninteractive elemenets could just derive from
that class though making it work may be too much work/code.

> /var/cache/debconf/config.dat diff attached (for Ubuntu rather than
> Debian, but hey); /etc is identical except for a popularity-contest
> configuration file that has the output of uuidgen in it.

I guess the couple of Value sets are harmless, since it's just taking
the default value from the templates.

-- 
see shy jo

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #78 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

To: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:10:03 +0100

On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:13:56PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > That's possible ... suggestions for naming of the common class? I'd been
> > thinking the new classes were small enough not to matter too much.
> > 
> > Maybe some magic could go into Debconf::Element::Noninteractive.
> 
> Yes, it seems to me most noninteractive elemenets could just derive from
> that class though making it work may be too much work/code.

OK, let's try this, moving the common show() code into
Debconf::Element::Noninteractive:

  http://patches.ubuntulinux.org/patches/debconf.238301.v2.diff

Tested with debootstrap, same changes. I'll probably put this version
into Ubuntu for now at least.

> > /var/cache/debconf/config.dat diff attached (for Ubuntu rather than
> > Debian, but hey); /etc is identical except for a popularity-contest
> > configuration file that has the output of uuidgen in it.
> 
> I guess the couple of Value sets are harmless, since it's just taking
> the default value from the templates.

Right, I think so too.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@debian.org]

Message #83 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

To: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>, 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:30:45 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Colin Watson wrote:
> OK, let's try this, moving the common show() code into
> Debconf::Element::Noninteractive:
> 
>   http://patches.ubuntulinux.org/patches/debconf.238301.v2.diff
> 
> Tested with debootstrap, same changes. I'll probably put this version
> into Ubuntu for now at least.

Feel free to merge that into debconf svn. As to whether it should go to
the sarge branch.. well, I suppose you could ask Steve. :-)

-- 
see shy jo

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #96 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

To: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: needs fixed in debootstrap now

Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:04:42 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

This bug has been addressed in debconf, is fixed in debootstrap for
ubuntu, but still needs to be fixed in the sid and etch scripts.

-- 
see shy jo

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #103 received at 238301@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>

To: 238301@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: please use DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN when installing sarge, etch, or sid, as is done for hoary and warty

Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:19:45 +0200

tags 238301 + patch
thanks

This patch solves this issue for sarge, etch and sid.  I suggest this
changelog entry:

  * [sarge,etch,sid] Set DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN=true during
    build, to avoid questions during upgrade. (Closes: #238301)

diff -ur debootstrap-0.3.1.7/etch debootstrap-0.3.1.8/etch
--- debootstrap-0.3.1.7/etch    Thu Sep 15 16:48:46 2005
+++ debootstrap-0.3.1.8/etch    Tue Oct 18 17:57:49 2005
@@ -130,7 +131,8 @@
     fi

     DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
-    export DEBIAN_FRONTEND
+    DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN=true
+    export DEBIAN_FRONTEND DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN

     baseprog=0
     bases=40
diff -ur debootstrap-0.3.1.7/sarge debootstrap-0.3.1.8/sarge
--- debootstrap-0.3.1.7/sarge   Thu Jun 16 10:48:23 2005
+++ debootstrap-0.3.1.8/sarge   Tue Oct 18 18:14:43 2005
@@ -143,7 +141,8 @@
     in_target /sbin/ldconfig

     DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
-    export DEBIAN_FRONTEND
+    DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN=true
+    export DEBIAN_FRONTEND DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN

     baseprog=0
     bases=40
diff -ur debootstrap-0.3.1.7/sid debootstrap-0.3.1.8/sid
--- debootstrap-0.3.1.7/sid     Thu Sep 15 16:48:46 2005
+++ debootstrap-0.3.1.8/sid     Tue Oct 18 17:57:34 2005
@@ -85,7 +85,8 @@
     fi

     DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
-    export DEBIAN_FRONTEND
+    DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN=true
+    export DEBIAN_FRONTEND DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN

     baseprog=0
     bases=7

Message #114 received at 238301-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

To: 238301-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#238301: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2

Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700

Source: debootstrap
Source-Version: 0.3.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb
debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc
debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz
debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 238301@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> (supplier of updated debootstrap package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:49:08 +1000
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap-udeb debootstrap
Architecture: source all powerpc
Version: 0.3.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Towns <ajt@debian.org>
Changed-By: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Description: 
 debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian system
 debootstrap-udeb - Bootstrap the Debian system (udeb)
Closes: 109176 152845 238301 239390 248578 280210 283234 289105 289635 308169 308361 313292 313353 314157 314160 314340 314373 314378 314547 314810 314858 314863 315225 315862 315875 315940 316884 317072 317447 318254 318281 319777 323362 323661 326831 328161 328369 329394 329468 334506 334521 334683
Changes: 
 debootstrap (0.3.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Revert fakechroot NMUs (0.3.1.1, 0.3.1.3, 0.3.1.7) due to incompatible
     license requirements (GPL) (Reopens: Bug#204652)
 .
   * Changes from 0.3.1.2 NMU, thanks to Joey Hess: (Closes: Bug#314810)
     + Fix incorrect use of "$@" in local. Closes: #314157, #314547
     + Fix fd redirection in download progress code. See #314373
     + Remove md5sums file from udeb. Closes: #314378
     + Fix debian-installer mode warning code. Closes: #314340
 .
   * Changes from 0.3.1.4 NMU, thanks to Joey Hess:
     + Wrap eval statement in exit_function in parens, working around
       bug #315444 in busybox sh. Closes: #314373
 .
   * Changes from 0.3.1.5 NMU, thanks to Anibal Monsalve Salazar:
     + Fixed "--variant=buildd option does not work" for pbuilder,
       closes: #314858. Patch by Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>.
 .
   * Changes from 0.3.1.6 NMU, thanks to Joey Hess:
     + Patch from Colin to redirect status messages to stderr when running
       --print-debs. Closes: #315875
     + Restore logging to stderr in debian-installer mode. Closes: #314160
 .
   * Changes from 0.3.1.8 NMU, thanks to Petter Reinholdtsen:
     + [functions] Mount /sys if it exist and is supported by the kernel.
       Patch from Cajus Pollmeier, Colin Watson and Ubuntu. (Closes: #289105)
     + [debootstrap] Document --resolve-deps in usage info. (Closes: #328161)
     + [etch] Replace libsigc++-1.2-5c102 with libsigc++-1.2-5c2. (Closes: #334506)
     + [etch] Remove pppoe from base, and only install
       ipchains on m68k.  Patch from Sven Luther. (Closes: #239390)
     + [sarge] Remove duplicate entries for m68k and amd64.  Patch from
       Frans Pop. (Workaround for bug #319777)
     + [etch] Add support for ppc64.  The patch for 'sid' did no longer
       apply.  Patch from Andreas Jochens. (Closes: #313353)
     + [sarge,etch,sid] Set DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN=true during build, to
       avoid questions during upgrade. (Closes: #238301)
     + Add script for breezy.  Patch from Colin Watson. (Closes: #315940)
 .
   * Changes from 0.3.1.9 NMU, thanks to Joey Hess:
     + Replace the etch script with a copy of the sid script, which pulls in
       gnupg, so the installed etch system has a usable apt. Closes: #334521
 .
   * Create /dev/ptmx in minimal devices tarball. (Closes: Bug#317072)
 .
   * Don't create empty available files, since old dpkg and new kernels can't
     deal with them. (Closes: Bug#308169, Bug#329468)
 .
   * Bump Standards-Version. Bump debhelper compatability level to 4.
   * Cleanup debian/rules, thanks to Joey Hess. (Closes: Bug#314863)
 .
   * Emit error message if no pkgdetails is available. (Closes: Bug#326831)
 .
   * Turn on --resolve-deps by default. Add --no-resolve-deps as an option.
     Combined with the previous changes to make the etch script dynamically
     determine base, this should resolve all the "can't install <foo>"
     bugs. (Closes: Bug#280210, Bug#308361, Bug#318281, Bug#323362,
     Bug#318254, Bug#313292, Bug#334683, Bug#248578, Bug#289635)
 .
   * md5sum doesn't exist when coreutils is unpacked but not configured;
     cp it across so it's available for --second-stage. (Closes: Bug#329394)
 .
   * Catch failures in "dpkg --status-fd" (Closes: Bug#317447, Bug#323661)
 .
   * Make "without" work right for duplicates (Closes: Bug#316884,
     Bug#319777)
 .
   * Simplify and correct file descriptor handling and debootstrap.log
     behaviour.
 .
   * Delete $TARGET with --print-debs and --make-tarball. (Closes: Bug#328369)
 .
   * Add a --make-tarball option. (Closes: Bug#152845)
 .
   * Create a default sources.list for apt. (Closes: Bug#283234, Bug#315225)
 .
   * Update manpage to talk about woody instead of sarge. (Closes: Bug#315862)
 .
   * Use partial/ directory when downloading. (Closes: Bug#109176)
Files: 
 876447d008c1c6643a5fc955c5a51c07 557 admin - debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc
 44d30b6c00ffb7fe19543bc1705be129 199174 admin - debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz
 f354db7c5fbf86601a5e1b78af74a97e 42636 admin extra debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb
 b93e027cfe4bbd8224ba45aefb6311a0 34996 debian-installer required debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb
Package-Type: udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFDW74COxe8dCpOPqoRAkadAJ9CC3Q38nOGJLwVAbBU2dqAqTKctwCgne3n
zE8Fx1NGVJxGTOdWAmXjhSE=
=YEym
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.