Debian Bug report logs - #218960
muttprofile does not sort reproducible

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: muttprofile does not sort reproducible

Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:52:43 +0100

Package: muttprofile
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

I noticed that muttprofile's list of available profiles did not obey
a sorting pattern I could grok.  Looking at the code I discovered that
it didn't sort at all.  Well, it would be nice if profiles would be
sorted alphabetically so one can grep through a longer list easier.

The following patch fixes this.

--- /usr/bin/muttprofile	2003-09-29 22:13:35.000000000 +0200
+++ /tmp/work/muttprofile	2003-11-03 16:50:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@
 
 print STDOUT "Available profiles ($i):\n";
 
-foreach $k (keys %profiles) {
+foreach $k (sort keys %profiles) {
     $mark = "";
     $name = "";
     $desc = "";

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
It's time to close the windows.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.

Message #10 received at 218960-forwarded@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>

To: Martti Rahkila <martti.rahkila@hut.fi>

Cc: 218960-forwarded@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Fwd: Bug#218960: muttprofile does not sort reproducible

Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:31:27 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tags 218960 +fixed
thanks

----- Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org> -----

Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:52:43 +0100
From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#218960: muttprofile does not sort reproducible
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

Package: muttprofile
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

I noticed that muttprofile's list of available profiles did not obey
a sorting pattern I could grok.  Looking at the code I discovered that
it didn't sort at all.  Well, it would be nice if profiles would be
sorted alphabetically so one can grep through a longer list easier.

The following patch fixes this.

--- /usr/bin/muttprofile	2003-09-29 22:13:35.000000000 +0200
+++ /tmp/work/muttprofile	2003-11-03 16:50:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@
 
 print STDOUT "Available profiles ($i):\n";
 
-foreach $k (keys %profiles) {
+foreach $k (sort keys %profiles) {
     $mark = "";
     $name = "";
     $desc = "";

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
It's time to close the windows.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 218960-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>

To: 218960-done@bugs.debian.org, 218957-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: fixed

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:23:54 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

This was fixed long ago.

-- 
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.