Debian Bug report logs -
#194460
update-cluster-hosts: Admin /etc/hosts.equiv too (and maybe one or two others?) if requested
Reported by: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 15:48:04 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Fixed in version 0.41.5-5+rm
Done: Marco Rodrigues <gothicx@sapo.pt>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>, update-cluster@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#194460; Package update-cluster-hosts.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>, update-cluster@packages.qa.debian.org.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Package: update-cluster-hosts
Severity: wishlist
Greetings,
In order to make rsh work more automatically, it would be nice if
"update-cluster-regenerate hosts" could admin /etc/hosts.equiv as well
as /etc/hosts if requested/configured to do so. I think this would be
useful and would fall within the scope of this package, and a couple of
other files might fall in this scope too (hosts.deny?).
Thanks,
--
-Adam P.
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!
<http://lyre.mit.edu/%7Epowell/The_Best_Stuff_In_The_World_Today_Cafe.ogg>
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>:
Bug#194460; Package update-cluster-hosts.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #10 received at 194460@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hi.
> In order to make rsh work more automatically, it would be nice if
> "update-cluster-regenerate hosts" could admin /etc/hosts.equiv as well
> as /etc/hosts if requested/configured to do so. I think this would be
> useful and would fall within the scope of this package, and a couple of
> other files might fall in this scope too (hosts.deny?).
I've been sitting on this bug report, but here is what I think about this.
/etc/hosts is used more broadly than hosts.equiv, and I think use of
hosts.equiv should be something optional.
Also I think hosts.equiv should better be handled by 'rsh-server' package,
not by something extra like update-cluster-hosts.
update-cluster-hosts exists because it is not clear who owns /etc/hosts.
regards,
junichi
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>:
Bug#194460; Package update-cluster-hosts.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #15 received at 194460@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hello Junichi,
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 20:48, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
>
> > In order to make rsh work more automatically, it would be nice if
> > "update-cluster-regenerate hosts" could admin /etc/hosts.equiv as well
> > as /etc/hosts if requested/configured to do so. I think this would be
> > useful and would fall within the scope of this package, and a couple of
> > other files might fall in this scope too (hosts.deny?).
>
> I've been sitting on this bug report, but here is what I think about this.
>
>
> /etc/hosts is used more broadly than hosts.equiv, and I think use of
> hosts.equiv should be something optional.
>
> Also I think hosts.equiv should better be handled by 'rsh-server' package,
> not by something extra like update-cluster-hosts.
> update-cluster-hosts exists because it is not clear who owns /etc/hosts.
That's a good point. There are several rsh server implementations, is
rsh-server the only one which uses /etc/hosts.equiv? If so, it might
make sense to reassign this to that package.
Thank you for the thoughtful reply,
--
-Adam P.
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!
http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/The_Best_Stuff_In_The_World_Today_Cafe.ogg
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>:
Bug#194460; Package update-cluster-hosts.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #20 received at 194460@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
> > Also I think hosts.equiv should better be handled by 'rsh-server' package,
> > not by something extra like update-cluster-hosts.
> > update-cluster-hosts exists because it is not clear who owns /etc/hosts.
>
> That's a good point. There are several rsh server implementations, is
> rsh-server the only one which uses /etc/hosts.equiv? If so, it might
> make sense to reassign this to that package.
I thought ssh used a different file than hosts.equiv.
We actually have several implementation of rsh, so they might share
the same file.
regards,
junichi
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>:
Bug#194460; Package update-cluster-hosts.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #25 received at 194460@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Greetings,
The update-cluster package provides an efficient way to manage multiple
configuration files from a single master list of machines. It is used,
for example, by mpich, jmon, dsh and update-cluster-hosts to generate
and maintain config files involving lists of machines.
I'm wondering whether this approach can be used efficiently to configure
rsh and ssh host lists, such as /etc/hosts.equiv and, with a bit more
difficulty, /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts2 (this would involve polling all of
the relevant machines for their public keys, or harvesting them from
some user's ~/.ssh/known_hosts2 file). hosts.equiv is easy to do, but
hard to assign in terms of ownership: does rsh-server own it, or is it
more generic to all rsh server implementations?
After two idle years in the BTS, I'd like to move forward on this, and
would be happy to generate patches as appropriate. So, any thoughts on
where this should go: update-cluster-hosts, rsh-server, etc? And
Matthew or Colin, would you accept into ssh an update-cluster script to
auto-generate /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts2?
Thanks,
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!
http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html
Reply sent
to Marco Rodrigues <gothicx@sapo.pt>:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:39:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent
to Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:39:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #30 received at 194460-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Version: 0.41.5-5+rm
The update-cluster package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/435897 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org.
(Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:42:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Tue Nov 28 23:07:26 2023;
Machine Name:
bembo
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.