Debian Bug report logs - #105587
ITP: pcp -- Performance Co-Pilot

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Colin Walters <walters@cis.ohio-state.edu>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RFP: pcp

Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 01:35:09 -0400

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

<URL:http://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/>

From the above URL:

 Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) is a framework and services to support
 system-level performance monitoring and performance management.

 The services offered by PCP are especially attractive for those
 tackling harder system-level performance problems. For example this
 may involve a transient performance degradation, or correlating
 end-user quality of service with platform activity, or diagnosing
 some complex interaction between resource demands on a single system,
 or management of performance on large systems with lots of "moving
 parts".

The news page mentioned that someone had made Debian packages, but the
URL to them was broken.  It might be worth looking into trying to find
the packager and/or his/her packages.

I haven't actually tried this software, but it looks cool, and the
stuff from SGI is generally high-quality.

There is also a neato looking GTK+ frontend at

<URL:http://k332.feld.cvut.cz/~lemming/projects/pcpmon.html>

that looks like it would also be worth packaging.

Message #10 received at 105587@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Michael Janssen (CS/MATH stud.) <janssen@chaos.cns.uni.edu>

To: Colin Walters <walters@cis.ohio-state.edu>, 105587@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#105587: RFP: pcp

Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:11:03 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

retitle 105587 ITP: pcp -- Performance Co-Pilot
thanks

In Colin Walters's email, 17-07-2001:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> <URL:http://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/>
> 
> From the above URL:
> 
>  Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) is a framework and services to support
>  system-level performance monitoring and performance management.
> 
>  The services offered by PCP are especially attractive for those
>  tackling harder system-level performance problems. For example this
>  may involve a transient performance degradation, or correlating
>  end-user quality of service with platform activity, or diagnosing
>  some complex interaction between resource demands on a single system,
>  or management of performance on large systems with lots of "moving
>  parts".
> 
> The news page mentioned that someone had made Debian packages, but the
> URL to them was broken.  It might be worth looking into trying to find
> the packager and/or his/her packages.
> 
> I haven't actually tried this software, but it looks cool, and the
> stuff from SGI is generally high-quality.
> 
> There is also a neato looking GTK+ frontend at
> 
> <URL:http://k332.feld.cvut.cz/~lemming/projects/pcpmon.html>
> 
> that looks like it would also be worth packaging.

Ok -- I'll bite.  This is just so cool it's not even funny. 

I'm a fairly new dveloper so give me a week or so to get a prelim
package..   

I'll put in a separate ITP for pcpmon. 

Looks like pcp wil need to be a bunch of packages - at least: 
pcp
libpcp
libpcp-dev

Ahh.. I'll contact upstream and ask them too, of course. 

-- 
Michael Janssen - Jamuraa - janssen@cns.uni.edu - jamuraa@base0.net
GPG Fingerprint: 87F1 92C4 44AA 4105 B1C4  EDEC D995 9620 C00E 9159

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #17 received at 105587-maintonly@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>

To: 105587-maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Your ITP of pcp (#105587)

Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 22:00:28 +0100

Hi!

This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of pcp.
Do you still intend to package this program?
If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP?

If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you
are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or
rename this ITP.

Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading 
this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP.  
Therefore, please do not reply to me personally.  An message in the 
BTS (sent to 105587-quiet@bugs.debian.org) will suffice.

Kind regards,
Bas Zoetekouw.

Message #20 received at 105587-submitter@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>

To: 105587-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Your ITP of pcp (#105587)

Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 22:22:27 +0100

Hi!

This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of pcp.
Do you still intend to package this program?
If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP?

If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you
are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or
rename this ITP.

Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading 
this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP.  
Therefore, please do not reply to me personally.  An message in the 
BTS (sent to 105587-quiet@bugs.debian.org) will suffice.

Kind regards,
Bas Zoetekouw.

Message #31 received at 105587-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>

To: 105587-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Renaming ITP of pcp (#105587)

Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:24:25 -0600

Hi!

This is a semi-automated message concerning the ITP of pcp.

The person who originately filed this ITP, doesn't seem to have
any interest in it anymore.  Therefore, I'm retitling it to an
RFP.  If anyone is interested in packaging this software, feel
free to take it.

Kind regards,
Bas Zoetekouw.

Message #40 received at 105587-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)

To: 105587-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: WNPP bug closed

Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:02 -0500 (CDT)

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500

Message #59 received at 105587-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>

To: 105587-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#105587: fixed in pcp 2.7.4-20080306

Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:26:51 +0000

Source: pcp
Source-Version: 2.7.4-20080306

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pcp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libpcp-pmda3-dev_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcp/libpcp-pmda3-dev_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
libpcp-pmda3_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcp/libpcp-pmda3_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
libpcp-trace2-dev_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcp/libpcp-trace2-dev_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
libpcp-trace2_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcp/libpcp-trace2_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
libpcp3-dev_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcp/libpcp3-dev_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
libpcp3_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcp/libpcp3_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
pcp_2.7.4-20080306.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pcp/pcp_2.7.4-20080306.dsc
pcp_2.7.4-20080306.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pcp/pcp_2.7.4-20080306.tar.gz
pcp_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcp/pcp_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 105587@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org> (supplier of updated pcp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:55:42 +1100
Source: pcp
Binary: pcp libpcp3-dev libpcp3 libpcp-pmda3-dev libpcp-pmda3 libpcp-trace2-dev libpcp-trace2
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.7.4-20080306
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
Changed-By: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
Description: 
 libpcp-pmda3 - Performance Co-Pilot Domain Agent library
 libpcp-pmda3-dev - Performance Co-Pilot Domain Agent library and headers
 libpcp-trace2 - Performance Co-Pilot application tracing library
 libpcp-trace2-dev - Performance Co-Pilot application tracing library and headers
 libpcp3    - Performance Co-Pilot library
 libpcp3-dev - Performance Co-Pilot library and headers
 pcp        - System level performance monitoring and performance management
Closes: 105587
Changes: 
 pcp (2.7.4-20080306) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial version of Debian packaging of PCP (closes: #105587)
Files: 
 eb5f752c5f1bf8160695442ffbbae400 666 utils optional pcp_2.7.4-20080306.dsc
 0fb756a5ff78185809d110a6bcf0e1b4 7008763 utils optional pcp_2.7.4-20080306.tar.gz
 3755176512b5263470b793dcc36450dc 1165606 utils optional pcp_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
 e46ccdf94e8053af637665cc08c42d08 296760 libdevel extra libpcp3-dev_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
 5c228d07a68cbe3bc1389cf4885c1ec7 116710 libs required libpcp3_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
 ced0bd58f5c868aa5c6eb8b230a860f5 57760 libdevel extra libpcp-pmda3-dev_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
 485c1aa0177e14c82533b01f0df81749 20010 libs required libpcp-pmda3_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
 e65307cdbb8151a736f240ff6530f71b 21674 libdevel extra libpcp-trace2-dev_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb
 ec15579034585a27a784a4516c6b0dcd 15614 libs required libpcp-trace2_2.7.4-20080306_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHz8cWm8fl3HSIa2MRAg2SAJ4mgeFiUh9V/kyCc4i4Xwz8xDPL5ACgnGz3
KJMRzhXXcein8FBTca7ifOg=
=5b64
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.