Debian Bug report logs - #687386
0ad: Uninstallable in unstable

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: 0ad: Uninstallable in unstable

Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:47:50 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: 0ad
Version: 0~r11863-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

0ad-data has been updated to alpha 11, rendering 0ad
uninstallable. Please fix this.

(and the SVN for 0ad-data has not been updated either,
 that should probably be fixed as well)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages 0ad depends on:
pn  0ad-data                   <none>
pn  gamin                      <none>
pn  libboost-filesystem1.42.0  <none>
pn  libboost-signals1.42.0     <none>
pn  libboost-system1.42.0      <none>
ii  libc6                      2.13-35
ii  libcurl3                   7.27.0-1
pn  libdevil1c2                <none>
pn  libenet0debian1            <none>
ii  libfam0                    2.7.0-17
ii  libgcc1                    1:4.7.1-7
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]   8.0.4-2
pn  libilmbase6                <none>
pn  libjpeg62                  <none>
ii  libopenal1                 1:1.14-4
pn  libopenexr6                <none>
ii  libpng12-0                 1.2.49-3
ii  libsdl1.2debian            1.2.15-5
ii  libstdc++6                 4.7.1-7
ii  libtiff4                   3.9.6-7
ii  libvorbisfile3             1.3.2-1.3
ii  libwxbase2.8-0             2.8.12.1-11
ii  libwxgtk2.8-0              2.8.12.1-11
ii  libx11-6                   2:1.5.0-1
ii  libxml2                    2.8.0+dfsg1-5
ii  zlib1g                     1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

0ad recommends no packages.

0ad suggests no packages.

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #10 received at 687386@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

To: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>

Cc: 687386@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: 0ad: Uninstallable in unstable

Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:01:36 +0200

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:47:50PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: 0ad
> Version: 0~r11863-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
> 
> 0ad-data has been updated to alpha 11, rendering 0ad
> uninstallable. Please fix this.
> 
> (and the SVN for 0ad-data has not been updated either,
>  that should probably be fixed as well)

Should 0ad really be included in Wheezy? At this point it's very much work
in progress. People should rather install a backport of the 1.0 release
later than some outdated development snapshot.

Cheers,
        Moritz

Message #15 received at 687386-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Vincent Cheng <vincentc1208@gmail.com>

To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

Cc: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>, 687386-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#687386: 0ad: Uninstallable in unstable

Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:23:07 -0700

Version: 0.0.11-1

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:47:50PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> Package: 0ad
>> Version: 0~r11863-2
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: sid
>>
>> 0ad-data has been updated to alpha 11, rendering 0ad
>> uninstallable. Please fix this.
>>
>> (and the SVN for 0ad-data has not been updated either,
>>  that should probably be fixed as well)
>
> Should 0ad really be included in Wheezy? At this point it's very much work
> in progress. People should rather install a backport of the 1.0 release
> later than some outdated development snapshot.

FWIW, my opinion as 0ad's maintainer is that it's already reached a
state where it is stable enough and has developed a large enough
feature set for it to be included in Wheezy.

(Anyways, alpha 11 is now in sid and is installable, so I'm closing
this bug. Sorry for the delay!)

Regards,
Vincent

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.